“No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans (Follow-Up #2)

One example of the children "RAISED BY THE ENTIRE VILLAGE!"

This is a follow-up post to “No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans, and “No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans (Follow-Up)

Please read, at the least, “No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans (Follow-Up) before you read this final post. That way, this post will make more sense to you! I hope?

6) “IT TAKES A MATURE, RESPONSIBLE AND LOVING [CHRIST-LIKE] FATHER AND MOTHER TO RAISE A CHILD, NOT THE ENTIRE SCREWED-UP VILLAGE!”

“IT TAKES THE ENTIRE VILLAGE TO RAISE A CHILD” This is what the postmodern/politically-correct/atheists, today, pander as the way to properly raise a child. They, however, have an ulterior motive, in my opinion, and that motive is, if “the entire village raises the child,” then the “entire village” can tell each and every American parent how to raise their child: “the village” can invade not only the school-systems, which it already owns and operates, but the parent’s homes as well, and indoctrinate them and their children in a postmodern-atheistic way of life. A postmodern/feminist/sodomite/atheist way of life, a despotic political agenda, that is set on drawing all parents, and their children, away from the truth and life of our Creator, Lord and Savior.

{One of my reasons for writing these posts has been to make parents more skeptical of what school and government officials put out there as cutesy, little slogans, which have the sole purpose of making parents believe, in a perennial sophomoric way, that these school and government officials have nothing other than their children’s best interests at heart. They do NOT have your children’s best interests at heart! These vermin are looking out only for their own ungodly and doomed-to-make-things-worse, political-ideological desires and agendas. Parents, you and your children are nothing more than pawns that these manipulative and despotic vermin seek to move around a world-sized chess-board. Wake up, sleepers, and smell the coffee!}

If you have ever watched the evening news and witnessed what happens in African villages, then you should know “the entire village” can’t protect itself, or “the child,” from starvation, rape, mass murder and genocide. So, then, how can any “American village,” modeling itself after this African version, “raise the child” properly? In particular, how can the American, inner-city ghetto, which suffers almost the same ills as its African counterpart, truly raise its children properly?

{For those of you who play manipulative games with words, if you don’t know what I mean by PROPERLY, then look up the definition in Webster’s. I’m sick to death of wasting time on semantics!}

The Lord gave a child to its mother and father only! He did not give the child to be a cog in the political/social machinery of this or any other man-conceived society and government.

If we want to get back to a sane time, some fifty years ago, when children were raised by their parents, and they didn’t take automatic weapons to school to murder their peers and teachers, then we must get “the village” (the local, state and federal governments and morally-bankrupt school-systems) out of our homes and away from our children. It is “the entire village” that is truly, and without hesitation, molesting our children, educationally, philosophically, physically/morally (as in endorsed sexual misconduct: “sex-ed”). In this case, and many more, the Parts (children) are, by far, greater (of more importance) than the Whole (society and government).

If parents want to put an end to the negative effects being perpetrated on their children by this despotic, Godless society/government, then they will need to do everything they can to keep their children from being indoctrinated by its eduction-system, entertainment-industry (MTV, music, movies, sitcoms, etc), and nightly-news propaganda-machine.

Parents must Know what is going on in their children’s lives. And the best way for them to know is by taking control of their children’s education. In other words, parents, take responsibility for your children and home-school them.

As I stated in the slogan: “IT TAKES A MATURE, RESPONSIBLE AND LOVING [CHRIST-LIKE] FATHER AND MOTHER TO RAISE A CHILD…” A life centered in Christ, and His way and truth, is the sole responsibility of the parent and child, not “the entire village”.

I have written on this subject before:

“It Takes An Entire Village to Raise A Child?” In the Good Old Hedonistic & “I-Did-It-My-Way” U. S. of A.? « An Outsider’s Sojourn.

****************************************************************************************

9/29/11

The following is yet another example of why we shouldn’t allow “the entire village” to be involved in the raising of our children!

VACAVILLE, CA – When Taylor McGinley sneezed in her health class at Will C. Wood High School a few weeks ago a student replied with “God, bless you,” but it’s what teacher Steven Cuckovich said after the sneeze that now has students questioning the teacher’s agenda.

“(Cuckovich) said, ‘Do you think that girl is evil, do you think the evil spirits are coming out of her?’ And the guy that said “bless you” was like ‘No, I was just doing what I was supposed to do when somebody sneezes, not trying to be rude,’” Taylor said, referring to the incident.

McGinley said Cuckovich never mentioned or referred to the expression again, but in Erica Fagan’s class Cuckovich is deducting points from students’ grades if someone said “bless you.”

“The first time (the student) did it (Cuckovich) took 25 points off of everybody in the class’s grade for one person saying it and then somebody did it the next day and he did it again,” Fagan said.

According to Fagan, Cuckovich told the students sneezing and saying “bless you” is a distraction and takes time out of learning.

via Vacaville student docked 25 points on test for saying ‘God bless you’ | news10.net.

****************************************************************************************

7) “‘JOHNNY HAS TWO MOMMIES,’ THEN JOHNNY WILL HAVE MENTAL, EMOTIONAL AND PHYSICAL (SEXUAL) PROBLEMS!”

Like it or not, perversion is perversion, and mental and emotional/spiritual illness is mental and emotional/spiritual illness. Homosexuality is a disease of the mind, body and heart (the soul), and, as with any other disease, homosexuality must be treated so those infected with it may be healed. Homosexuals, like anyone else who is sick, must make the decision, for themselves (it is their responsibility), to seek a treatment and cure. And the physician the homosexual should seek out is the only Physician Who can truly help them be healed: their Creator, Lord and Savior, Jesus the Christ.

People were not made by the Lord to become what He detests! The Lord is not a mentally and emotionally ill pervert, and all of us, every last one, were made in His and His Father’s image. We were not created to be perverse!

Perversion will beget perversion (in any form, not just homosexuality), just as violence will beget violence. If Johnny has sodomites for “parents”, then he will pay the price for that sometime, and in some way, sooner or later in life.

Enough said.

8) “DO NOT VALUE ANYTHING SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS DIVERSE (DIFFERENT), INSTEAD, LEARN TO DISCERN WHAT IS WORTHY OF BEING VALUED, WHETHER IT BE DIVERSE OR NOT!”

“RESPECT IS NOT A RIGHT!”

The postmodern-atheist calls on everyone to have an “open-mind,” “be tolerant,” and “value diversity”. The postmodern-atheist, however, doesn’t always practice what he or she preaches. For instance, when it comes to Christians, apostate or sons of God, the postmodern-atheist is anything but open-minded, tolerant, and a valuer of diversity, and, therefore, the postmodern-atheist is a hypocrite. But I digress.

I will not value anything merely on the basis of its diversity: the difference between something and everything else around it. This is one of the major problems I see with this country: the almost total blindness needed to be “tolerant” and “politically-correct” (a willful lacking-in-discernment) is what has led to the majority of young Americans, in almost every aspect of life, being such obnoxious panderers of mediocrity.

Respect is not a right, it is earned. And if a foreign culture is not deemed worthy of my respect, then that culture, no matter how politically-correct (politically-IN) it may be, will never get it! And if a human being is not deemed worthy of my respect (beyond respect for a human life), then that human being, no matter how politically-correct (politically-IN) he or she may be, will never get it! I decide who and what receives my respect, not this lame society’s middle-school-peer-pressure tactics: “tolerance,” political-correctness,” and “valuing diversity.”

For more on my stand on these two issues, I refer you to slogan numbers 4 and 5 in the last post.

A True Hero!

9) “HERO IS AN OVERUSED WORD TODAY!”

The word hero has lost its meaning and impact. Today, everyone is a hero: paid soldiers are heroes, cops on the beat are heroes, people who give blood are heroes.

Not in my opinion! I saw heroes on September 11, 2001. I saw New York City firemen climbing the stairs of the World Trade Center towers for the sole purpose of saving lives, and you could see in the expression on their faces, they knew they were going to die. These men were true HEROES! An overweight cop eating a donut and drinking coffee, or a soldier killing people in the name of democracy and freedom, these are not heroes. True heroes put their lives at risk to save lives, not brutally take them.

10) “I PLEDGE MY ALLEGIANCE TO MY LORD AND SAVIOR!”

“‘TO LIVE IS CHRIST,’ NOT DEMOCRACY/CAPITALISM!”

“CHRIST IS NOT AN AMERICAN!”

I make no oath or pledge to anyone or anything other than my Lord and Savior, and, by His command, I don’t even make an oath to Him.

33“Again, you have heard that the ancients were told, ‘YOU SHALL NOT MAKE FALSE VOWS, BUT SHALL FULFILL YOUR VOWS TO THE LORD.’ 34“But I say to you, MAKE NO OATH (NO PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE) AT ALL, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, 35OR BY EARTH, for it is the footstool of His feet, or by Jerusalem, for it is THE CITY OF THE GREAT KING. 36“Nor shall you make an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. 37“But let your statement be, ‘Yes, yes’ or ‘No, no’; anything beyond these is of EVIL. (Matthew 5)

My reason for going on living in this rotten world is due solely to Christ being my life. I have no other reason to live, but Christ:

21For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain. (Philippians 1)

Listen up! Christ is not an American, nor has He ordained this country to be the Christian savior of the world.

11) “…GOVERNMENT OF THE WEALTHY AND POWERFUL FEW, BY THE WEALTHY AND POWERFUL FEW, FOR THE WEALTHY AND POWERFUL FEW…”

This slogan speaks for itself!

“No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans (Follow-Up)

This is a follow up post to “No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans.

In the original post, I made up some slogans that convey my thoughts and opinions on politics and life in America today. And, since some are pretty controversial, I thought I would go through them and explain where I’m coming from.

1) “AMERICANS WHO PROFIT THE MOST SHOULD PAY THE MOST TAXES!”

“ASK NOT WHAT WE CAN DO FOR CORPORATE AMERICA, ASK WHAT CORPORATE AMERICA CAN DO FOR US!”

This is pretty cut and dry. America is like a huge country-club, and everyone in this country-club [supposedly] pays dues (taxes) to belong. There are different levels of membership in the American country-club: some pay more dues in the club (or should anyway), because they get the extreme perks, the top benefits, the club offers, and some can only afford to pay a small amount of dues, so they get less.

Those who benefit most from this corporate-capitalist country-club should be FORCED to pay the most dues (taxes), since they enjoy the greatest benefits this country-club has to offer. And, on the other side, those who benefit less from this country-club should pay the least in dues (taxes). This, however, is not the case! The wealthy-elite pay hardly anything, when they are basically getting all the perks the club has to offer. Meanwhile, the folks who truly can’t afford the smallest amount of dues are picking up the tab for the wealthy-elite. This would be fine if this were a monarchy, since, then, it would be known up front that the wealthy and powerful would maintain and grow, while the peasants struggled in the dirt and “ate cake.” But this is the land of the so-called “American Dream,” and thus this kind of membership program is nothing but a manipulative, hypocritical lie, a complete fraud!

There was a time, some fifty years ago, when the wealthy-elite paid taxes at a rate of 90%. I am not for that, by the way. But I do believe a 60% tax-rate, WITHOUT ANY LOOPHOLES OF ANY KIND, for the wealthy-elite would be more than fair. The American middle-class made these people rich and powerful. And how do the wealthy-elite repay the middle class for all of their hard work and sacrifices over the years? They repay them with work outsourced to other countries, bald-faced lies, and corporate/bank corruption that has basically destroyed the world economy.

Here is an example of the out-of-balance tax-system I’m referring to:

CEOs who make more than their companies pay in taxes

Twenty-five of the 100 highest paid U.S. CEOs (including some with Chicago ties) earned more last year than their companies paid in federal income tax, a pay study by a Washington think tank said on Wednesday. See who some of them are, in order of their compensation. To see the entire survey, click here.

via CEOs who make more than their companies pay in taxes – chicagotribune.com.

2)”AMERICA: ONE NATION [NOT] UNDER GOD!”

“IN CORRUPT POWER AND GREED WE TRUST!”

This nation is as ungodly as the most perverse and corrupt nation that ever existed on the face of the earth, including communist countries. In fact, communist countries are honest about their atheistic political and economic ideologies: unlike the hypocrites in this country, the communists don’t use our Lord and Savior as a political device or magic genie. The communists are upfront about their atheism, and, therefore, although I despise atheism, I can respect them more than the disgusting hypocritical nature of most Americans.

I have written on this subject more than once:

Deism, “Reason” + the “Founding Fathers” = “The Separation of Church and State” « An Outsider’s Sojourn.

America: “A Christian Nation?” Think Again! (Reprise) « An Outsider’s Sojourn.

3) “‘FREEDOM AIN’T FREE,’ THEN THE COST IS TOO HIGH!”

“Freedom ain’t free” is just another low-life, idiotic/patriotic excuse for going to war and murdering tens of thousands of innocent men, women and children: it’s nothing more than a capitalist-propaganda slogan to get ignorant/patriotic Americans in a flag-waving, shouting, “U S A-U S A,” frenzy, so the wealthy-elite can wage war and get wealthier and more powerful. The US of A, today, makes the Japan of one-hundred years ago look like Gandhi, when it comes to waging war-for-profit on the poor and weak, the disenfranchised in this world!

If the sacrificing of human life at the alter of freedom (democracy) and capitalism is the cost to be paid, then the cost is not only too high, it’s despotic and inhumane, it is evil!

4) “DON’T TOLERATE THE ‘PLAYER,’ AND INTENSELY HATE THE ‘GAME!’”

“ALL RAP IS (C)RAP, BAD ROCK IS A (C)ROCK!”

“AMERICA: THE LAND OF ARTISTIC MEDIOCRITY, AND THE HOME OF THE CULTURALLY DEAD!”

Except for a few true artists (Aaron Copeland, Robert Rauschenberg, George Gershwin, Alvin Ailey, Twyla Tharp), over the last two-hundred and thirty-five years, the US of A has always been mediocre at best, when it comes to art/culture. This artistic/cultural mediocrity, however, is now due to America’s incessant need to kowtow to the low-life, criminal nature of “the player,” the three-chord-wonder rocker, and the Hollywood starlet. These so-called “artists” (vermin) are controlled and promoted by the greed-driven corporate-sows (the Hollywood and record-industry executives) who live for one purpose only, to make more and more money.

The downfall of American art/culture began with Blues and Jazz, in the early part of the twentieth century, and has come to fruition, today, in the (artistically speaking) bastard offspring of these two forms of folk-music: “rock and roll,” “rap” and “hip-hop.”

{Jazz and Blues, in their original form, have an artistic quality, but as folk music only. Art is, and should always remain, elitist, and by elitist I mean, not everyone who can write a simple song or poem, or dance a jig, should be considered an artist. Elitism is at the heart of the arts, whether it be politically-correct or not. True art, in my opinion (and I’m speaking from a secular point of view here), should raise man up above the animal kingdom, and above the base, mundane and mediocre aspects of his daily life. Man is mediocre in so many ways, but art, up until recently, has always been the one area man held up to a higher standard. Art was something, wrong or right, that man wouldn’t sell out, until now, that is. Thanks to the postmodern mental-illness, which causes its victims to be rendered incapable of distinguishing between beautiful and ugly, worthy and unworthy, and GOOD and EVIL, everything, in an artistic/craft/cultural sense, is now considered to be on the same mediocre, low-life level: an African wood-carving is now equal with the Mona Lisa, and a native folk-song is now equal with The Planets Suite, by Gustav Holst. The postmodern/Darwinian/atheist has simply taken a world filled with color and made it black and white: one size fits all, and the only flavor is vanilla!}

Instead of progressing in the arts, the US of A has gone all the way back to the “multicultural” jungle. What took hundreds of years, in Western European culture, to raise man up from his baser instincts has now been almost completely destroyed in less than one century!

The Playa yells, “Don’t hate the playa, hate the game.” What a joke! The playa helped invent the game, but he doesn’t want us to know that. The playa knows who he is! The term playa does not refer to all African Americans (although many African Americans defend the playa, instead of standing up to him), no more than the drugged out rocker and Hollywood star represent all Caucasians, Latinos, and Asians.

I will never TOLERATE the playa, or anything like him, and I DO INTENSELY HATE THE GAME the playa helped to create. The game the playa, despite his protestations otherwise, loves and benefits from greatly!

5) “NEVER TOLERATE THE INTOLERABLE!”

Many Caucasian Americans, out of some kind of white-guilt syndrome, have learned to not only TOLERATE but embrace what should be considered, by most civilized peoples (black, white, blue, indigo or violet), completely INTOLERABLE music, theater (movies) and dance. A white-guilt manifested in “multiculturalism (‘valuing diversity’),” “political-correctness,” and “tolerance,” which most Americans, over the past twenty years, have been indoctrinated in while attending public schools. And this white-guilt has set American art/culture, as weak as it may have always been, back hundreds of years.

Music, dance, and movies (theater), that would have been considered obnoxious and perverse trash forty years ago, now get heralded as art; and to the extent that the “Grammy Awards” and “Oscars,” instead of being earmarked solely for the true artist, are now handed out to drug-addicted/drunken, racist/sexist, and perverse, panderers of mediocrity in all things. These developmentally-arrested and stoned-out-of-their-mind hoodlums (black and white), masquerading as musicians, dancers and actors, have done nothing (beyond accruing a “rap-sheet” a mile long) to receive anything but another jail sentence. And yet, instead of another night in handcuffs, they are given awards that once, many years ago, were reserved only for those who had truly earned them: the gifted individual (black, white, Hispanic, or Asian) who was willing to work at, and sacrifice for, his or her art.

Thirty-plus-years ago, I had been on enough album sides to be an active member (voting member) of N.A.R.A.S. (National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences). And for two years, 1978-79, I voted on the Grammy Awards. In each of those years, I voted for Earth, Wind and Fire in their category, because I loved their music. EWF were guys, like me, who had gone to college in music and had come together to write and perform the music they loved: GOOD MUSIC, GOOD COMMERCIAL ART! And, in both of those years, EWF never won. Then, almost a decade later, I saw “rapper” after “rapper” going up to get their Grammy Awards. I was literally nauseated by the spectacle of these low-life x-cons, who “rap” to sexist and racist bad-poetry, set to ripped-off music, getting Grammy Awards. And yet EWF hadn’t even gotten the second look a decade earlier.

It’s time to call out the mediocre, American “artist” (slob) for what he or she is! It’s time for someone to tell the truth: the “player” (“Playa”) king ain’t got no clothes on! He’s naked as a jaybird, perverse, mediocre, and corrupt as hell; as are his (or her) low-life, Caucasian counterparts (subjects of the “playa kingdom,”) on the “rock and roll” and Hollywood side of the plug-nickel (as in, “It ain’t worth a plug-nickel”).

But these folks are merely the pawns of the Caucasian corporate-criminals who own and operate them. You see, the real “playa” king is some white “dude,” in a $5000.00 suit, riding around in a Rolls, who hates anyone below his “station in life.”

The postmodern/Darwinian/feminist/sodomite/atheist tail that wags the American dog has, through the indoctrination of “multiculturalism” in our public education-system, and the intimidation of “political-correctness,” “tolerance,” and even despotic legislation like “hate-speech” laws, coerced the largest portion of Americans into remaining silent, when it comes to what were once considered (and still are by most) to be intolerable actions and lifestyles. The few, through political treachery, have forced their perverse, postmodern/feminist/sodomite/atheistic views on the rest of this society. And this society has responded by sitting idly by while all of this has taken place, over the last half-century.

I will not TOLERATE the INTOLERABLE! I could care less what the politically-correct/tolerant, feces-encrusted tail thinks of me! And now it knows what I think of it!

I will finish slogans 6 through 11 in Follow-Up #2.

“No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans

As the country sinks by the bow, economically, it appears that Washington is about to, once again, come up with another “new” plan to resuscitate its all-but-dead, because-it’s-Godless, education-system. Of course, Washington’s main concern, as always, will be coming up with some new Madison Ave-Jr high-moronic slogan (propaganda), so all the Pavlovian political-pundits/news-media types can state this new slogan over and over again. This constant repetition, by the elite-owned-and-operated media, will, then, successfully indoctrinate most of the easily-manipulated, fast-asleep-in-a-patriotic-stupor middle-class and poor Americans. This is part of the not-so-subtle political-propaganda machinery the wealthy elite use to manipulate and coerce their way into gaining more wealth and power.

{“Because-it’s-Godless,” by the way, does not mean I’m a supporter of any religious theology being perpetrated on public-school students. Let me state firmly, I am against any religion’s teachings/doctrines being a part of the public education curriculum. Religion is for the parents and families to teach, not the government or its education-system, as the constitution implies! Besides, I don’t want my Lord and Savior bandied about like some pagan idol (Buddha, Muhammad, etc)! Beyond the historical perspective of how religion has played a part in human history, there should be no mention of individual religions in the public (not private) classroom. Having said that, I inserted “Because-it’s-Godless” simply because religion is being pandered to our children in public schools. Our public-school students are being bombarded with the Darwinian/postmodern/atheist religion, which indoctrinates them with religious teachings such as “natural selection,” tolerance/political-correctness, or moral-relativism, feminism, and materialist “science,” which perpetrates religious doctrines like “homosexuality is natural,” and “man-made global warming is a reality.” Since there is no SUBSTANTIATED EVIDENCE for any of these doctrines of the Darwinian/postmodern/atheist religion, then all must be considered faith-based beliefs, and, thus, religious (metaphysical) in nature! All of these Darwinian/postmodern/atheist, faith-based religious-beliefs, in the guise of “science” and “cultural” curriculum, go against the separation of church and state clause in the constitution, just as Christian or Jewish doctrine would also. All religion, not just Christianity, should be kept out of public school curriculum, or all should be taught. It is only equitable!}

The lacking in persuasiveness of the Jr-high-level-intellect, and immature, devoid-of-integrity, American-politician, today, evidently creates the need for manipulative slogans, which are intended to garner public support for the multitude of inept and asinine, or completely destructive and horrific, laws, and politically-driven actions, America perpetrates on the peoples of this world, including its own middle-class and poor: “Operation Desert Storm,” “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” “No child left behind,” “We are a nation of laws,” “The child at risk,” and my favorite moron-Jr high-slogan, “Just say, ‘No,’ to drugs!”

{With this inconceivably-asinine “Just say, ‘No,’ to drugs” slogan, I always imagined hardcore drug-dealers, just after hearing totally-out-of-touch-and-senile Nancy Regan proclaiming this moronic slogan, rolling around on the floor, laughing their butts off. I still wonder if Mrs. Regan was so Hollywood-unaware and ignorant as to have believed that the temptation of drug usage could be averted simply by saying, “No?” If life had always been this simple, Eve, after being tempted, would have simply told the serpent, “No!” The lunatics have been running this American asylum for a long while now, and this slogan, among many others, is the proof!}

And the blind, ignorant masses will, without fail, repeat these ridiculous slogans as if they mean something, or actually have some power to effect change for the good. But, of course, they never do. These manipulative, and totally meaningless, proclamations only make the problem worse, since they make it seem as though something substantial is being done to correct the problem, when, of course, in reality, nothing substantial is being done to correct the problem. So is the case with Georgie W. Bush’s education slogan, “No child left behind.” Georgie W’s slogan should read, “No child left unscathed,” or even better, “No child left to successfully compute, create (Arts Education), read and comprehend, write, and problem solve.”

I attended public schools in the 1950s and ’60s, and I received a good education; an education, that I consider to be, far superior to the one perpetrated on our children today. The ungodly left, and corporate right, started changing the public education-system just as I was graduating from high school in the late ’60s.

Because there were “children at risk” in New York City, the South, and a few other places, these Godless make-it-up-as-they-go schemers decided to seize the opportunity and overhaul the whole education-system. Their reasons for the complete overhaul of the education-system had nothing, whatsoever, to do with repairing something that, for all intents and purposes, still worked properly. Not in the least. What these feminist/sodomite/Darwinian/atheists had in mind was a propaganda machine, in the guise of public education, that would ultimately raise up a nation filled with sodomites, feminists and atheists who would have enough power and wealth to topple the values and will of the American majority: they simply wanted to overthrow, what they called, “outdated middle-class morality.” They wanted a Postmodern Utopia devoid of God and His absolute truth. They wanted a modern-day version of Sodom and Gomorrah, and they have gotten what they set out to get.

The Lord has allowed these postmodern idiots to chase after, and catch, what they wanted, and now they, as well as the rest of us, are going to pay dearly for it. The religious-hypocrites on the conservative-right, who, through their blind patriotism (idolatry), allowed this to happen, can complain all they want, but they also are getting what they deserve! Beyond being fat, lazy, and blindly patriotic, they remained silent for four decades, while these lunatics, the tails that wagged the dog, changed everything. Now, when everything is in shambles, the “silent majority,” the “tea-partyers,” are, in their warped, willfully-ignorant minds, going to attempt to drag the whole country back to the 1940s and ’50s. It ain’t going to happen. It is too late!

All those of us have to do, who are old enough to remember when public education worked, is open our eyes to the product being produced by the current education-system, and we will see that the ungodly plan of these vermin, first initiated a half-century ago, is quickly coming to fruition. It is unfolding before our very eyes. Just look at the quality of student (human-being) this country is producing, overall, and then tell me that my sense about all of this is wrong.

I have two old human-adages that, I believe, are filled with wisdom:

1) “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!”

2) “Measure twice, cut once!”

The public education-system, fifty-plus years ago, was not broken, it didn’t need to be fixed by completely overhauling the entire system! It just needed to be repaired by people who knew, by experience and wisdom, they must measure twice and cut once before repairing anything.

It is the blind fool who fixes what is not broken. The education-system, in the 1950s and ’60s, was in need of repair in certain areas of the country: the effects of racist segregation on schools in the South needed to be repaired in a major way, and many of America’s largest cities, like New York, for instance, were also in need of major repair. But there was no need to fix, overall, what was not broken, educationally, in America. All of this “We need a major change in our education-system, because children are AT RISK,” was nothing but politically motivated cow-manure!

The education slogans (as well as many others), over the last fifty years, have been nothing more than indoctrinating-propaganda perpetrated by the politically-powerful and wealthy few who rule this country, the politically-powerful and wealthy tail that still wags the American dog.

Here are some slogans I wouldn’t mind hearing again and again:

“NO MORE INDOCTRINATING/PROPAGANDIZING SLOGANS!”

“AMERICANS WHO PROFIT THE MOST SHOULD PAY THE MOST TAXES!”

“ASK NOT WHAT WE CAN DO FOR CORPORATE AMERICA, ASK WHAT CORPORATE AMERICA CAN DO FOR US!”

“AMERICA: ONE NATION [NOT] UNDER GOD!”

“IN CORRUPT POWER AND GREED WE TRUST!”

“‘FREEDOM AIN’T FREE,’ THEN THE COST IS TOO HIGH!”

“DON’T TOLERATE THE ‘PLAYER,’ AND INTENSELY HATE THE ‘GAME!’”

“NEVER TOLERATE THE INTOLERABLE!”

“IT TAKES A MATURE, RESPONSIBLE AND LOVING [CHRIST-LIKE] FATHER AND MOTHER TO RAISE A CHILD, NOT THE ENTIRE SCREWED-UP VILLAGE!”

“‘JOHNNY HAS TWO MOMMIES,’ THEN JOHNNY WILL HAVE MENTAL, EMOTIONAL AND PHYSICAL (SEXUAL) PROBLEMS!”

“DO NOT VALUE ANYTHING SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS DIVERSE (DIFFERENT), INSTEAD, LEARN TO DISCERN WHAT IS WORTHY OF BEING VALUED, WHETHER IT BE DIVERSE OR NOT!”

“HERO IS AN OVERUSED WORD TODAY!”

“RESPECT IS NOT A RIGHT!”

“ALL RAP IS (C)RAP, BAD ROCK IS A (C)ROCK!”

“AMERICA: THE LAND OF ARTISTIC MEDIOCRITY, AND THE HOME OF THE CULTURALLY DEAD!”

“I PLEDGE MY ALLEGIANCE TO MY LORD AND SAVIOR!”

“‘TO LIVE IS CHRIST,’ NOT DEMOCRACY/CAPITALISM!”

“CHRIST IS NOT AN AMERICAN!”

And lastly,

“JUST FOR ONCE, ALL YOU ELITE OINK-OINKS, DO SOMETHING THAT WORKS FOR THE GOOD OF SOMEONE OTHER THAN YOURSELVES!”

“…GOVERNMENT OF THE WEALTHY AND POWERFUL FEW, BY THE WEALTHY AND POWERFUL FEW, FOR THE WEALTHY AND POWERFUL FEW…”

“CORPORATE CAPITALISTS, THE LORD HATES GREED AND CORRUPT POWER!”

1Come now, you rich, weep and howl for your miseries which are coming upon you. 2Your riches have rotted and your garments have become moth-eaten. 3Your gold and your silver have rusted; and their rust will be a witness against you and will consume your flesh like fire. It is in the last days that you have stored up your treasure! 4Behold, the pay of the laborers who mowed your fields, and which has been withheld by you, cries out against you; and the outcry of those who did the harvesting has reached the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth. 5You have lived luxuriously on the earth and led a life of wanton pleasure; you have fattened your hearts in a day of slaughter. 6You have condemned and put to death the righteous man; he does not resist you. (James 5)

The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)! (Follow-Up #2)

Planned Parenthood's Heritage

This is a follow-up post to The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)! and The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)! (Follow-Up)

The following quote is from a book entitled, War Against the Weak, by Edwin Black:

In the first three decades of the 20th Century, American corporate philanthropy combined with prestigious academic fraud to create the pseudoscience eugenics that institutionalized race politics as national policy. The goal: create a superior, white, Nordic race and obliterate the viability of everyone else. How? By identifying so-called “defective” family trees and subjecting them to legislated segregation and sterilization programs. The victims: poor people, brown-haired white people, African Americans, immigrants, Indians, Eastern European Jews, the infirm and really anyone classified outside the superior genetic lines drawn up by American raceologists. The main culprits were the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune, in league with America’s most respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as Harvard, Yale and Princeton, operating out of a complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island. The eugenic network worked in tandem with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the State Department and numerous state governmental bodies and legislatures throughout the country, and even the U.S. Supreme Court. They were all bent on breeding a eugenically superior race, just as agronomists would breed better strains of corn. The plan was to wipe away the reproductive capability of the weak and inferior. Ultimately, 60,000 Americans were coercively sterilized — legally and extra-legally. Many never discovered the truth until decades later. Those who actively supported eugenics include America’s most progressive figures: Woodrow Wilson, MARGARET SANGER, and Oliver Wendell Holmes who ruled on the infamous Carrie Buck trial and declared “three generations of imbeciles is enough.”

[MARGARET SANGER: one of the founders of Planned Parenthood]

American eugenic crusades proliferated into a worldwide campaign, and in the 1920s came to the attention of Adolf Hitler. Under the Nazis, American eugenic principles were applied without restraint, careening out of control into the Reich’s infamous genocide. During the pre-War years, American eugenicists OPENLY SUPPORTED Germany’s program. The Rockefeller Foundation financed the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute and the work of its central racial scientists. Once WWII began, Nazi eugenics turned from mass sterilization and euthanasia to genocidal murder. One of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute doctors in the program financed by the Rockefeller Foundation was Josef Mengele who continued his research in Auschwitz, making daily eugenic reports on twins. After the world recoiled from Nazi atrocities, the American eugenics movement — its institutions and leading scientists — renamed and regrouped under the banner of an enlightened science called HUMAN GENETICS. (emphasis mine)

via War Against The Weak – Home Page.

The Nordic/Aryan Ideal: "The Fit for Life"

If you think eugenics is dead and gone, then think again! Remember, over the past few years, hearing about “designer babies” on the news? “Designer babies:” where parents can select the human traits they want in their child before conception? This is just another example of an ungodly, perverse product of eugenics (genetic research). Here is a recent news article that reveals the long-term, deleterious effects of eugenics, physically, mentally, and emotionally, on the human beings who have been ravaged by it:

North Carolina hearing explores history of forced sterilization – CNN.com

(CNN) — Deborah Chesson spoke through tears Wednesday as she addressed a North Carolina task force on behalf of her mother.

“I’m writing you with hopes that you will understand the pain, hurt and emptiness I still feel inside,” she read.

“A social worker convinced my mom to sign for me to undergo an operation that would prevent me from getting pregnant, not knowing all the while that I was being set up to be sterilized like I was some kind of animal.”

Dozens of North Carolina citizens spoke at the public hearing against the state’s five-decade forced sterilization program. The listening session, held by the governor’s task force, gave victims the opportunity to share their experiences with a state task force charged with recommending compensation for victims and their families.

Eugenics is the process of selectively breeding humans and animals to rid the population of “unfit” characteristics. In 1933, North Carolina passed a revised eugenics law. The law established the North Carolina Eugenics Board, which largely targeted low-income females for sterilization procedures. (emphasis mine)

via North Carolina hearing explores history of forced sterilization – CNN.com.

And here is yet another example of this Darwinian/atheistic plague, but this time it’s Al Gore and his buddies at the United Nations planning an Aryan/Nordic Utopia:

This population control agenda is also reflected in official UN documents.

The following is language from a UN resolution that was adopted by the UN General Assembly that was designed to further the implementation of Agenda 21….

“….population growth rates have been declining globally, largely as a result of expanded basic education and health care. That trend is projected to lead to a stable world population in the middle of the twenty-first century… The current decline in population growth rates must be further promoted through national and international policies that promote economic development, social development, environmental protection, and poverty eradication, particularly the further expansion of basic education, with full and equal access for girls and women, and health care, including reproductive health care, including both family planning and sexual health, consistent with the report of the International Conference on Population and Development.”

Most Americans don’t grasp it yet, but the truth is that the global elite are absolutely obsessed with population control. In fact, there is a growing consensus among the global elite that they need to get rid of 80 to 90 percent of us. (emphasis mine)

via Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control.

We must face the fact that eugenics is still alive and well. The Nordic/Aryan ideology that gave license to the forced sterilization, torture (“medical experimentation”), and murder, of 18 million people in Europe, during W.W.II, is still thriving in the world today. We could, if we tried real hard, delude ourselves into believing excrement smells like a rose, but sooner or later, when we leaned down to smell it, we would know it is nothing more than excrement. In much the same way, then, we can delude ourselves into believing Planned Parenthood (abortion central) and genetic research have nothing to do with ungodly and perverse eugenics, but, when we get close enough to really look at and smell Planned Parenthood and genetic research, we should be capable of discerning that it is nothing more than ungodly and perverse eugenics in disguise!

God is not mocked. There is a day of reckoning coming, where all will be held accountable for what they have done in this life, good and bad:

Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap. (Galatians 6: 7)

For more on the subject of eugenics and Planned Parenthood, you can read here:

tolbert_plannedparenthood_targets.pdf (application/pdf Object).

The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)!

I happened across one of the pop “science” channels and there sat this evolutionary psychologist proclaiming, in an obnoxiously atheistic and authoritative tone, that “the human animal” was never intended to be monogamous. According to this Darwinian “intellect”, an “evolving human animal seeks to be joined” (to mate) and yet the “human animal” is “an adulterer at heart”. Why are human beings “adulterers at heart”? According to this over-educated purveyor of postmodern (unsubstantiated) propaganda, human beings are nothing more than advanced primates who have little or no control of themselves or their actions. Human beings (“the human animal”), according to this Spiritually dead hack and quack, have no basis for civilized behavior, beyond, of course, that which “natural-selection” has, through mutation and chance (evolution), alloted them.

{In a little over one hundred and fifty years, these Darwinian lab-coated and pocket-protecting atheists have taken the sanctity and beauty of human life, a life created by God, and transformed it into a seething cesspool existence (“Darwin’s primordial soup”) where everything is “relative” and there is no absolute truth.}

This kind of atheistic/”scientific” propaganda has a desensitizing effect: if totally held as a belief, this “theory” will dehumanize other human beings in the minds and hearts of those believing the lie. When a person with no real substantiated evidence becomes convinced that he or she is little more than a mutated-by-chance chimpanzee, then along with their own life other people’s lives become devalued in their hearts and minds. This devaluing of human life, then, can open the door to all kinds of evil in the name of “science” and “humanity”: a “science” under the guise of “progress” (myths) that in the end harms more than benefits humanity.

Introduction

Voices haunt the pages of every book. This particular book, however, speaks for the never-born, for those whose questions have never been heard for those who never existed.

Throughout the first six decades of the twentieth century, hundreds of thousands of Americans and untold numbers of others were not permitted to continue their families by reproducing. Selected because of their ancestry, national origin, race or religion, they were forcibly sterilized, wrongly committed to mental institutions where they died in great numbers, prohibited from marrying, and sometimes even unmarried by state bureaucrats. In America, this battle to wipe out whole ethnic groups was fought not by armies with guns nor by hate sects at the margins. Rather, this pernicious white-gloved war was prosecuted by esteemed professors, elite universities, wealthy industrialists and government officials colluding in a racist, pseudoscientific movement called EUGENICS. The purpose: create a superior Nordic race.

To perpetuate the campaign, widespread academic fraud combined with almost unlimited corporate philanthropy to establish the biological rationales for persecution. Employing a hazy amalgam of guesswork, gossip, falsified information and polysyllabic academic arrogance, the eugenics movement slowly constructed a national bureaucratic and juridical infrastructure to cleanse America of its unfit. Specious intelligence tests, colloquially known as IQ tests, were invented to justify incarceration of a group labeled feebleminded. Often the so-called feebleminded were just shy, too good-natured to be taken seriously, or simply spoke the wrong language or were the wrong color. Mandatory sterilization laws were enacted in some twenty-seven states to prevent targeted individuals from reproducing more of their kind. Marriage prohibition laws proliferated throughout the country to stop race mixing. Collusive litigation was taken to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sanctified eugenics and its tactics.

The goal was to immediately sterilize fourteen million people in the United States and millions more worldwide the lower tenth and then continuously eradicate the remaining lowest tenth until only a pure Nordic super race remained. Ultimately, some 60,000 Americans were coercively sterilized and the total is probably much higher. No one knows how many marriages were thwarted by state felony statutes. Although much of the persecution was simply racism, ethnic hatred and academic elitism, EUGENICS wore the mantle of respectable science to mask its true character. (emphasis added)

via War Against the Weak – Introduction.

Eugenics, a pseudo-scientific/ideological aberration of Darwin’s half-cousin, Francis Galton, was the bastard child of Darwin’s racist tendencies and unsubstantiated hypothesis (“natural selection”). Eugenics is the “common ancestor”, the “founding father”, of today’s modern genetics (stem cell “research”, and a popular form of “selective breeding”, “designer babies”): a morally questionable at best “science” that thrives in this hedonistic country, as well as the rest of the world. Through this manipulative renaming, eugenics has merely been dressed up in a more “politically-correct”, “tolerant” and less objectionable garb (genetics); a garb that seeks to cover up the ungodly elitist hatred and bigotry, the dirty underwear, that is at the heart and soul of eugenics.

One can sprinkle flowers and perfume on cow manure in order to make it look and smell better, but if he or she gets real close and digs real deep he or she will find that it still looks and smells like bovine excrement. In the same sense, a pile of unsubstantiated hypothetical excrement by any other name still smells like “bad science”!

This kind of desensitizing and life-devaluing propaganda (evolution/eugenics/genetics) has been perpetrated on every child attending American public schools for the last three-quarters of a century or more. Is it any wonder, with this in mind then, that American public school students, over the past twenty years, have made the evening news for mass murdering felllow students and teachers in their high schools. Is it any wonder, then, that prior to the nineteenth century (before Darwin) there were no records of “serial killers” to be found anywhere in the world? Is it any wonder, then, that in America alone Darwinian-indoctrinated doctors, over the past thirty-plus-years, have “legally” (Roe v. Wade) murdered hundreds of millions of unborn babies (“abortion”)?

{Unborn children, alive in their mother’s wombs, torn apart by chemicals and surgical instruments (“aborted”), and for the sole purpose of granting an immature and promiscuous woman’s “right of choice”. A “woman’s right of choice” to escape the ultimate penalty for responding to her sexual desire like a female animal “in heat”: an “unwanted pregnancy”, a truly inconvenient truth. Why wouldn’t a “liberated” woman respond this way? After all, the feminist/lesbian/atheists, like the psychologist above, have pounded into women’s minds, during the last forty-plus years, that their bodies belong to them, and therefore, they have the “right” to do with them as they see fit, no matter how heinous the outcome. “Liberated” women have become desensitized and dehumanized to the point that their unborn children have become nothing more to them than unwanted inanimate objects: unwanted inanimate objects euphemistically referred to as “embryos” and “fetuses”. The maternal qualities that God built into women are all but gone now, and like men, women, today, are truly less than the human beings their Creator created them to be.}

Is it any wonder, then, that Hitler, seven decades ago, was able to find a “scientific rationalization” through evolution and eugenics for the mass murder of millions of people (literally) branded as “inferior races”? Is it any wonder, then, that other nations in Europe since Hitler have followed his example by seeking to “ethnically cleanse”, through mass murder, their countries of the inconvenience of “the unfit for life”?

…one of Hitler’s favorite sayings was, “POLITICS IS APPLIED BIOLOGY“. Hitler’s ideas of racial purity led to unprecedented atrocities in Europe. Since then, ethnic cleansing has occurred in Cambodia, the Balkans, Sudan, and Rwanda. In one sense, ethnic cleansing is another name for the tribal warfare and mass murder that has afflicted human society for ages, but these crimes seem to gain intensity when believed to be SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED. (emphasis added)

via Social interpretations of race – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

“POLITICS IS APPLIED BIOLOGY.” In other words, since the “human animal” has evolved and is, therefore, nothing more than a mutated-by-chance ancestor of a chimp, then it is, in a political sense, expendable: “Since there is no sacredness or eternal value to life, the disposal of certain breeds of ‘the human animal’ (ethnicities, races) can be politically and socially expedient!” Note also that, according to this author, these kinds of “crimes intensify when believed to be SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED”. Has there ever been a more SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED (and unsubstantiated) hypothesis as “natural selection”?

When we become desensitized to the sanctity of life, then we open the door for the devaluing of our own lives and those around us; we begin the long disastrous journey toward the dehumanization of ourselves and everyone else. This perverse kind of postmodern/atheistic coercion can be rather subtle at first: the introduction of “scientific” theories, as unsubstantiated as they may be, and the use of terms and phrases (euphemisms) such as “common ancestor,” “natural selection,” “survival of the fittest,” “the human animal,” “embryos,” “zygotes,” “fetuses,” the “feeble-minded,” and the “UNFIT FOR LIFE,” can lull us into a Godless stupor where life of any kind is no longer reverenced.

Bald-faced liars didn’t start out that way: they started out with little fibs that got more and more involved, which then lead to more elaborate lies until one day they couldn’t tell the difference between the lies and reality. The loss of integrity can happen in much the same manner: a person starts with one little lie to the boss, or the pilfering of money from the safe, but after a while the lies become bolder and the theft increases until that initial small crack in integrity has turned into a Grand Canyon of lies and thievery. A “scientific theory” can begin with a flawed hypothesis and, unless corrected or thrown out, can then grow into a bald-faced lie put forth as truth; and in the end, this unsubstantiated “theory” (bald-faced lie) can end up doing more harm than it ever did good; such is the case with evolution and eugenics/genetics, whether we are willing to face the facts or not!

If we’re not careful, then, we can become like frogs in a frying pan: a frog placed in a frying pan filled with water and set at a low temperature, which is then slowly increased, will sit there totally unaware and seemingly unaffected until he is completely cooked through. In a similar manner, most people will sit quietly by while listening to and believing every unsubstantiated “scientific theory” put forth by lab-coated “geniuses” until these so-called “theories” have totally obliterated their ability to reason.

Hitler didn’t start out in the early 1930′s by suggesting the mass-murder of millions of Jews, gypsies and homosexuals. No, he started out with subtle and subliminal language (“theories” and ideologies) that would slowly but surely indoctrinate and blind the German people to the truth of what he was about to do.

In conclusion, do we really know and understand what lies at the heart and agenda of eugenics/genetic research today? Do we really know and understand why an unsubstantiated hypothesis (“natural selection”), by an emotionally and religiously confused man (Darwin), is being thrust on our children: in the public schools, by the government, and on every television channel and news program? If the “theory of evolution” is as airtight as the Darwinian lab-coats claim, then why are they so fearful of an alternative to their religious dogma: why are they so against the teaching of “intelligent design” and creationism in the public schools? Why do these Darwinian lab-coats fight so vehemently against a simple parenthetical clause in science textbooks that states, “Evolution is merely a hypothesis that many scientists disagree with.” If they’re so sure of themselves and what they believe to be true, then why are they so afraid?

{A liar doesn’t want others delving deep into his lies, nor does he want the truth exposing his lies!}

Are these politically powerful, Darwinian lab-coats so afraid of their weak hypothesis that they don’t want it scrutinized in any way? I thought good scientific practice amounted to treating any hypothesis as being false until all information contained in the hypothesis could be thoroughly substantiated through scientific scrutiny? I guess this kind of science (science seeking the truth) has either become rare or non-existent in the world today?

Those of us with children, who also have faith in the Lord, should keep them from being indoctrinated in this bald-faced and bad-science fabrication: science and knowledge are not evil, but educational indoctrination and bad science are! From the beginning of life, the education of children is not the responsibility of the ungodly state, it’s the responsibility of the parents! Education is a responsibility that, since the inception of public education, has been shirked by almost all parents, except, of course, those who have chosen to embrace their parental responsibilities by homeschooling their children.

Do we want our children to grow up believing that their ancestors were puke-eating chimpanzees? Do we want our children to value the sanctity and preciousness of created life, whether it be a kitten, robin or another child? Then we best be speaking to our children, while we still have the authority and opportunity, about the lies being perpetrated by the atheistic powers that rule this world system!

It’s A Postmodern “Make-It-Up-As-We-Go” World: Two Blaring Examples

According to the (Atheist) "Experts in Education", this is an Absolute No No!

Here are a couple of well known and wise adages:

“If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!”

“Measure twice, cut once!”

These are pretty straightforward: if something is working well, then leave it alone, but if something is broken, then be very careful (“measure twice”) not to rush into making changes (“cut”) that, in the long term, might make things worse.

But here, unfortunately, is how postmodern atheists interpret these adages:

“If it ain’t broke, then there must be something really wrong with it! De-construct! De-construct!”

“Don’t bother to measure, that’s an old-fashioned waste of time, let’s just go ahead and cut and see what happens!”

And here is the postmodern atheist adage:

“Don’t worry if we screw everything up, or take something that worked well and ruin it, the government will still kowtow to our every whim!”

These “self-actualized” and “enlightened” folks must destroy anything that is working properly, and then remake it in such a way as to guarantee its never working properly again. They just can’t help themselves: it’s a postmodern-feminist-lesbian-homosexual-atheist thing, a “make-it-up-as-we-go” thing, that is just so backward and upside down that they truly have no choice but to make things worse. If it weren’t for the fact that these folks so continually mess almost everything up for the rest of us, they would almost be deserving of our concern and pity.

With this in mind, then, it seems that a few of these “self-actualized” and “enlightened” folks (“education experts”) have decided that elementary aged children shouldn’t have best friends:

…from Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn to Harry Potter and Ron Weasley, the childhood “best friend” has long been romanticized in literature and pop culture — not to mention in the sentimental memories of countless adults.

But increasingly, some educators and other professionals who work with children are asking a question that might surprise their parents: Should a child really have a best friend?

Most children naturally seek close friends. In a survey of nearly 3,000 Americans ages 8 to 24 conducted last year by Harris Interactive, 94 percent said they had at least one close friend. But the classic best-friend bond — the two special pals who share secrets and exploits, who gravitate to each other on the playground and who head out the door together every day after school — signals potential trouble for school officials intent on discouraging anything that hints of exclusivity, in part because of concerns about cliques and bullying.

“I think it is kids’ preference to pair up and have that one best friend. As adults — teachers and counselors — we try to encourage them not to do that,” said Christine Laycob, director of counseling at Mary Institute and St. Louis Country Day School in St. Louis. “We try to talk to kids and work with them to get them to have big groups of friends and not be so possessive about friends.”

“Parents sometimes say Johnny needs that one special friend,” she continued. “We say he doesn’t need a best friend.” (emphasis added)

via The End of the Best Friend – NYTimes.com.

Yes sir, let’s do away with best friends: I mean who needs best friends, in particular, children? These over-educated busy-bodies have decided that having a best friend is an act of “exclusion”. In other words, children who are sullen and self-contained, and will probably remain that way for the rest of their lives, are being, in the minds of these blind-guides, excluded by the children that need and can make friends: and, “Darwin knows”, the postmodern atheist can’t have one group of children doing better than the others around them, because that’s not equitable. This is how they approach competition of any kind, in particular, sports. To these “effete impudent snobs”, sports are fine as long as they’re not competitive: no keeping of scores or stats, no winners or losers. This is why we have a large number of children who can’t compete in life; and some of these children, over the past fifteen years, have carried automatic rifles to school and murdered their competitive and life-loving peers.

“Parents sometimes say Johnny needs that one special friend,” she continued. “WE SAY he doesn’t need a best friend.” This is a revealing statement! It seems that parents’ opinions mean little to these postmodern “experts”, as is the case in this next disgusting news item:

The Excuse!

First grade thru six graders can ask for condoms.

Provincetown, MA – Elementary school children, as young at six years old, could ask for condoms in one Massachusetts school district.

First thru six graders can receive the contraceptives if they ask in the Provincetown School District, which is right outside of Boston.

All 66 high schoolers and the 89 students in the lower grades can start asking for these latest school supplies in September.

There will be no papertrail and the school isn’t’ taking names AND WILL NOT REPORT BACK TO PARENTS. (emphasis added)

via First grade thru six graders can ask for condoms.

In a society where there is so much paranoia about pedophilia and “lost innocence”, it seems very strange, and even more hypocritical, that postmodern atheists (religionists) would be so keen on supplying sexual aids to extremely young children. I guess, in the dark recesses of the postmodern atheistic mind, it’s alright for elementary aged children to have sex, as long as it is with children of their own age. What’s the difference, then, in reality, between a pedophile seeking to introduce a child to sexual activities (“corruption of a minor”) and an “education expert” providing children with the means to have sex without the threat of pregnancy or disease? It seems to me that both have a rather perverse interest in the sexual behavior of young children, if there is such a thing as sexual behavior in young children. The difference between the two, of course, is the postmodern atheist (“education expert”) will get away with his or her perversion (under the guise of “science”), while the pedophile won’t (no PhD)!

Note, once again, that the parents are not to be contacted. The reason for this is obvious: most parents, with any sense of decency, would immediately withdraw their children from the school system where these so-called “experts” (perverts) have any control or influence.

Yes sir, it’s just another day in this postmodern-atheistic “make-it-up-as-we-go” world!

Freedom of Expression vs Postmodern Despotism (Part II)

This is Part II of Freedom of Expression vs Postmodern Despotism. Please read Part I first.

Postmodern religionists (“devolving” humanists) have evidently decided that creating their idea of an earthly Utopia will require them to radically alter the political and social structure of the nations. These postmodern religious zealots desire a “one-world order”: one government, one economy, and one man-made ideology/philosophy (a postmodern religion). But most of all, they desire a world where there is no Creator God and, thus, no believers in Him. A world where mankind is god. In essence, postmodern religionists simply want (without knowledge, of course) what the serpent, their true lord and savior, had promised Eve in the garden; what mankind has been tempted by ever since:

The serpent said to the woman, “You surely will not die! 5“For God knows that in the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and YOU WILL BE LIKE GOD, KNOWING GOOD AND EVIL (“enlightened”).” (Genesis 3)

As I have stated before, I don’t believe we (believers) have any political rights, and my belief is based on the earthly life our Lord and Savior exhibited. So I’m not posting on this issue to stir up a political hornet’s nest. I’m writing these two posts simply because I find most postmodern religionists to be hypocritical, especially when it comes to the subject of freedom of speech and thought (expression). Like this poster states, “No Opinions TOLERATED, But Ours!”

According to most postmodern religionists, only those who think, believe, and act as they do, are permitted to openly express their views. Anyone having an opinion, which falls outside of the narrow-minded postmodern-Utopian ideology, will immediately be silenced by the speech and thought police (gestapo): this silencing is accomplished by shouting down the offending party or by labeling them “politically incorrect”, “intolerant”, and/or purveyors of “hate speech”. In this way, then, the postmodern religious tail can wag the dog (the American majority) until it has been coerced into total silence. This is how most despots initially start their regimes; and then comes the intimidations (in public venues and college campuses), violent demonstrations, burning of books, mandatory oaths to the state, arrests, beatings, torture, and lastly, a hangman’s noose.

As an example of this far-left despotism, a few years ago a sports commentator made the mistake of claiming that many people of African descent have a distinct advantage over other races, physically and, therefore, athletically. He simply stated, and without malice, that this advantage was due to the physical nature of most Africans. This man wasn’t claiming that all Africans were athletically gifted or that athleticism was all Africans have to offer the world, he was just making the same observation that many of us, including many African Americans themselves, have made over the years. After all, most African American athletes, college and pro, are not at all shy, when it comes to bragging about their physical and athletic prowess.

The postmodern political machine (the race card pundits), of course, immediately moved into action and jumped all over this man: he was labeled a “racist” and a “bigot”. The news channels, over the next few days, ran his comments and ultimately, through their politically-correct witch-hunt, ruined this man’s career. And all this commentator had done, in reality, was dare to express his opinion.

"White Men Can't Jump!"

All anyone has to do is take a long-hard look at college and professional sports, and they’ll observe, if they have eyes to see and a mind to reason, that many, or even most, African American athletes have a distinct advantage, physically and, therefore, athletically, over other races they compete against; in particular, Caucasians. This conclusion has nothing to do with bigotry, or “hate speech” (or even jealousy), this conclusion simply is the result of observation and experience. Over the last forty-five years, I have watched thousands of sports events and have come to the same conclusion as this commentator. My conclusion is not a racist one, nor, in my opinion, was this commentator’s. I’m simply sharing my conclusion, which is based on forty-five years of watching African American athletes excel over other races.

{Remember the movie, “White Men Can’t Jump”? Where was the postmodern furor over this statement, this movie? It seems that “White men” do not fall under the same “politically-correct” and “tolerant” cover that African American men do. Can anyone say, “Double Standard” or, “Discrimination” or, “Racism”? There wasn’t any “double standard”, “discrimination”, or “racism”, involved in this movie: in comparison to most Black athletes, Caucasians (White men) can’t jump. This isn’t “intolerance”, “racism”, or “bigotry”, this is just the plain and simple TRUTH!}

In my opinion, this commentator’s only real mistake was being born a Caucasian male, first of all, and then, secondly, talking about the physical attributes of another race, especially people of African descent. We Caucasian males must remember to bear our “White guilt”, according to the postmodern lunatic fringe (the minority tail). I’m sure this commentator was totally unaware of the “politically-correct” machinery that was waiting (as it always is) to seek out and destroy anyone it judged to be “politically-incorrect” and/or “intolerant”. This Caucasian male commentator was stripped of his “right” to express himself (the “right” of any American citizen), simply because he chose to share his thoughts (to express his opinion) on the physical and athletic supremacy of most African Americans.

“Political-correctness”, “tolerance” and “hate speech” have become the weapons of choice for enforcing postmodern religious censorship: the despotic silencing of expression and, in many cases, the TRUTH. “Big Brother” is alive and well and, at the moment, probably taking part in a “gay pride” parade or “a woman’s right to murder” rally. As this quote from the article states,

“Respect is being redefined as agreement, and censorship disguised as a virtuous defence of diversity…”

It is no longer enough to “live and let live” and simply say, “To each his own,” which most of us are willing to do. In the postmodern Utopian world, those, who are of a different mind-set and, therefore, opinion, are not only to “tolerate” what they sense to be ABNORMAL and DOWNRIGHT WRONG, they are also expected to respect and embrace it. According to this postmodern despotic-dogma, I not only have to “TOLERATE” the fact that homosexuals have the “right” to marry, and women have the “right” to murder their unborn (and ALIVE) children, I also have to respect and embrace these ABNORMALITIES and ATROCITIES as if they were a normal function of life. It seems to me that our “political rights”, these days, have much more to do with being WRONG than ever being RIGHT.

{TOLERATE: 3. To PUT UP WITH; ENDURE.}

With all of this said, then, has anyone else noticed how truth, whether it be simple or absolute, seems to be disappearing from the face of the earth. Truth is not very popular these days, especially when it forces certain people, whether they be African American, Caucasian, Asian, or whatever, to take a good look at themselves in the mirror. By certain people, I mean those who were brought up in a society where the messing-up of one’s own life, as well as everyone else’s, was still worthy of a pat on the back. These particular self-absorbed and self-assured folks were raised-up in a postmodern/feminist/lesbian dominated society; where competition had become a dirty word, and not competing was worthy of reward; where men were weak-willed and effeminate, and women were more masculine than feminine; where a person’s “self-esteem” and “self-actualization” (self-everything) were more important than his or hers’ tested and proven character. These folks were raised-up in the U.S. of A., over the past forty years, and they are now running the show for the rest of us.

In a nutshell, the U.S. has become a narcissistic and hedonistic nation, where beauty, health, sexual appeal, and wealth and power, are prized above all else; where the Lord’s Truth is now considered to be “old fashioned” or “out of date”. “America is a nation of laws”, but it’s also a nation of poor excuses: poor excuses for being morally and ethically bankrupt, cruel, corrupt, perverse, slipshod, and downright mediocre at best.

In the battle between freedom of expression and postmodern despotism, the postmodern religionists have won. But they haven’t won the war, nor will they. The war will be won when the Lord comes, in great power and glory, to establish His reign on earth. So, as much as I’m troubled by all of this, and I truly am, I must wait on the Lord’s righteousness to be manifested in its fullness.

Freedom of Expression vs. Postmodern Despotism

Below is a quote from a Pew Forum article that caught my attention.

“We are in danger of losing the battle for freedom of speech,” Mr. Rushdie said. It is being recast as a Western imposition, not a universal human right. Respect is being redefined as agreement, and censorship disguised as a virtuous defence of diversity…

Freedom of expression and imagination “is now very much back in question, and is strongly under attack by religious authorities and religious armies of different sorts, and not only Islam,” Mr. Rushdie said. (emphasis added)

via “We are in danger of losing the battle for freedom of speech”: Salman Rushdie.

I would imagine that many will come to the conclusion that Mr. Rushdie is speaking exclusively of the Islamic religion. But I believe Mr. Rushdie is also speaking of a worldwide political ideology that is actively seeking to silence all dissenting voices:

“Freedom of expression and imagination ‘is now very much back in question, and is strongly under attack by religious authorities and religious armies OF DIFFERENT SORTS, and not only Islam.’”

A worldwide political ideology that is, in reality, nothing more than a new form of religion: a despotic postmodern religion seeking to establish its version of a Utopian world.

Humanists, over the past forty or fifty years, have been absorbed into this new despotic religion. The humanists’ openness, intellectually and culturally, has all but disappeared and been replaced with the closed-off, arrogant, and aggressive, pseudo-intellectualism of postmodern religionists.

By pseudo-intellectualism, I mean older humanists, for the most part, were highly educated, intellectually gifted men and women who were open to differing opinions and ideologies. These men and women also loved and supported the Arts: painting, sculpting, theater, dance and music. Whereas today’s postmodern religionists refuse to listen to any differing opinion, whatsoever, have just enough education to be dangerous, and are, for the most part, lacking in knowledge of, or appreciation for, the (true) Arts. Postmodern religionists have also been “educated” in a more narrow-minded system (public and higher) than older humanists: an education system which, as opposed to teaching, indoctrinates students with its “politically-correct” and “tolerant” curriculum: “Women’s Studies”, “Multicultural Studies” and “The Impact of ‘Rap music’ on American Culture”. While claiming to “value diversity” and “open-mindedness”, this narrow-minded “education” system hypocritically seeks to silence all diverse opinions and ideologies; which are, in its opinion, “politically-incorrect” and/or “intolerant”. According, then, to these religious zealots, freedom of expression is only for those who have sworn their oath of loyalty to the postmodern religious dogma; all others are to either conform or be coerced into remaining silent.

The sad results of this narrow-minded and despotic education-system can be observed all around us. Today, there are far too many Master and PhD degrees in history, philosophy and biology, etc, who are almost dead, culturally/artistically: they adore Lady GaGa and Britney Spears, but have never listened to Beethoven’s nine symphonies or a Chopin Nocturne; they obsess on television sitcoms, comic books and X Box games, but wouldn’t know Rembrandt’s paintings from Pablo Piccaso’s, or Christine Aguilera’s on-stage gyrations from Twyla Tharp’s legitimate choreography. Many of these supposedly highly educated men and women (“our brightest minds”) cannot even take part in a controversial conversation without resorting to child-like shouting and name calling, nor can many of them even identify their own state on a map.

Thus many of these self-proclaimed geniuses are at a complete loss, when it comes to discerning what is true or false, politically, ideologically, morally or ethically, and what is true Art, as opposed to merely someone’s hobby, religious idol or garbage. The only political/ideological/moral discernment most of these folks possess comes from what they have heard from others or made-up in their own minds. And the only Art they are familiar with is the street-born, low-life variety (“crafts”): “rap” and “alternative Rock” (Music), “Saturday Night Live” and “The Kardashians” (Theater), a crucifix in a jar of urine and cartoons (Visual Art), and primitive bumping and grinding in an overtly sexual, vulgar manner (Dance).

Western European culture has been rejected by most postmodern religionists today. Postmodern religionists have real issues with those who set a high standard of excellence in their work and have a real sense of personal responsibility: if everyone took personal responsibility for their actions and sought to achieve excellence in their work and life, then the lazy, unproductive and low-life leaches in society would feel left out; and, “Darwin knows”, postmodern religionists can’t “tolerate” that. The postmodern must bring everyone down to the level of the lowest achiever. This is the reason why many bright and eager-to-learn students, in this country’s public “education” system, find it hard to excel: these students are literally held back, so the lazy, arrogant, and almost always absent, problem student (the “player”) doesn’t have his or her precious “self-esteem” affected in a negative way. Instead of seeking to raise these problem students up to the educational level of their peers, who attend school to learn (as opposed to goofing-off or selling drugs), the complete opposite is accomplished: “The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America”. The other reason for the postmodern rejection of Western European culture is, in my opinion, due primarily to its Caucasian-male roots: Caucasian/heterosexual/Christian men are despised by most postmodern feminists, lesbians and homosexuals.

There is nothing in the postmodern reality that will ever be considered good or bad, right or wrong, since everything, in their warped reality, is “relative”: everything is “equal”, unless, of course, something is deemed “politically-incorrect” and/or “intolerant”. The postmodern Utopian world is a sad place, where mediocrity thrives and excellence dies a slow and tedious death.

Is it any wonder, then, that the largest portion of public-school-indoctrinated students (Generations “X” and “Y”), over the past forty years, have been horribly lacking in basic reading and apprehension skills, basic writing and communication skills, and simple problem-solving. And, of course, these developmentally arrested lost sheep are totally incapable of discerning true Art forms from corporate-commercial excrement?

{I left out science and computation skills, because the Darwinian/atheist nature of this country’s public-school systems stresses “science” and math skills. After all, the postmodern/Darwinian/atheists need to keep their little student-robots prepared to carry on the war against God; so “materialistic science”, as opposed to legitimate science, and math skills are stressed, highly, in their tax-payer-funded indoctrination-camps (schools). For anyone who has ever watched Jay Leno do his street interviews (where he asks folks easy questions and the majority are totally clueless), what I’m writing, here, should not be that surprising or objectionable. Jay’s interviewees are the results of a public-education system run by postmodern religionists: a self-replicating education-system, where postmodern robots raise up more postmodern robots. A self-replicating education-system whose long-term (behavioral) goal is to raise up an entire world of mindless, “politically-correct” and “tolerant” ancestors of puke-eating chimps.}

Art!

In the postmodern religionists’ retro-grade-inverted sense of reality, a make-it-up-as-they-go reality, a carved out piece of wood from Africa (a fertility god, for instance) is as much a work of Art as Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa or Michelangelo’s David. The word “craft” has evidently been removed from the language, since everything in a creative sense is now considered to be Art, no matter how primitive and poorly made (“crafted”). It seems that our wonderful gifts from the Lord, creativity, the ability to learn and discern, which once set us apart from the rest of creation, are now being attacked and destroyed. It seems that the postmodern elite desire for man to become more animal-like (instinctual) and, thus, ungodly.

Craft!

According to postmodern religionists, everything is now to be done by instinct (“lifestyle”, “sexual orientation”, etc.): “What does your instinct tell you to do?” In a world of no absolute truths, where everything is totally up for grabs, instinct is all one really has to make any kind of decision or judgment: “free moral agency”. Evolved human instinct, in the mind of the postmodern, has replaced the leading of the Lord’s Spirit and Word.

{“Free moral agency”, in my estimation, wreaks of an individualism that stands in the way of true moral and ethical judgment, since every “free moral agent” has his or her own sense of what is moral and ethical behavior. How, then, can a nation of “free moral agents” come to a consensus on what is moral and ethical behavior? After all, if we’re all “free moral agents”, then how can we impose our will, when it comes to morality and ethics, or anything else for that matter, on other “free moral agents”? Isn’t every “free moral agent” FREE to decide what is moral and ethical and what isn’t, according to his or her own INSTINCTS: INSTINCTS, according to the postmodern religion, passed down from his or her ancestor (a puke-eating chimpanzee)?}

With this is mind, then, is it any wonder that what was once considered to be moral and ethical behavior is now considered “outdated” and “old fashioned”? And is it, then, any wonder that many people are becoming, everyday, more animal-like in their behavior?

Moral relativism, which is devoid of the Lord’s Truth and discernment, is, I believe, at the heart of our societal ills. Most of this postmodern INSTINCTUAL wandering (“free moral agency”) can, of course, be traced back to “the enlightenment” and one unsubstantiated and dehumanizing hypothesis: Darwin’s fairy-tale, “natural selection”/evolution.

I will finish this in Part II.

A New-Atheist Teaching in a Catholic School: For What Purpose?

This despicable poster, which so wrongly, and disgustingly, portrays our Lord and His sacrifice, sums up the arrogant, perverse nature and outrageous ignorance of the unregenerate mind (the “new”-atheist’s mind). Because of their total inability to sense the Spiritual realm that surrounds and confounds them, new-atheists are condemned to be the slaves of their own five senses and basic instincts: they are, in reality, little more than the animals they profess (without substantial evidence) to be their distant ancestors. This, perhaps, explains why new-atheists are such a tiny minority: 2.5% worldwide and 3-9% in the USA.

As anyone who reads this blog should know by now, I am not a fan of the Catholic church or its school system. But the following Pew Forum article forces me to side with the Catholics this time.

May 28, 2010

Iowa Catholic school fires teacher after Facebook survey indicates she doesn’t believe in God

by Clark Kauffman

The Des Moines Register

A Catholic teacher from Fort Dodge has been fired because of a Facebook survey in which she said she did not believe in God.

Abby Nurre, 27, was hired last summer as an eighth- grade math teacher at St. Edmond Catholic School. In August, she responded to a Facebook members’ poll in which she was asked whether she believed in God, miracles or heaven.

In response, Nurre answered, “No.” Her answers then became part of her Facebook autobiography page, which was accessible only to her designated “friends.”

In November, Nurre posted a comment to an online discussion forum, Atheist Nexus. In her post, she provided a link to a New York Times article that, as she described it, indicated the government had spent $2.3 million on prayer research in the past 10 years.

Five weeks later, she was called to the office of Monsignor Kevin McCoy and handed a letter informing her that she was suspended for making “atheist statements in a public forum.”

McCoy barred Nurre from school grounds. A few days later, without discussing the matter with Nurre, the school’s board of directors fired her for violating a policy that prohibits employees from advocating “principles contrary to the dogmatic and moral teaching of the church.” (emphasis added)

via Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.

In my opinion, this woman is merely attempting to create a story-line in which she ultimately becomes the “innocent victim of religious injustice”.

Why would any person, openly denying the existence of God, want to teach in a Catholic school system, where a religion about God is at the heart of the entire curriculum? Why wouldn’t a new-atheist, instead, want to teach in the public schools, where they already rule the entire system and more positions are available?

I can venture a pretty good guess, perhaps this woman wanted to teach at a religious school solely for political purposes: to indoctrinate her students in new-atheism and/or get fired for her ungodly beliefs and make a political stink? I believe it was for the latter reason that this new-atheist sought a teaching position in a religious school. In my estimation, and I could be wrong, this woman has simply gotten what she wanted: a chance to bring new-atheism to the forefront, and to show how she and her brothers and sisters are (in her opinion) being “discriminated against” in this society. This woman is most likely nothing more than a new-atheist “undercover-operative” seeking to stir up another “separation of church and state”/anti-religious frenzy.

{A new-atheist’s claim of there being no God is as much a statement of faith as the Christian’s belief of there being One. The new-atheists will rail on, vehemently, when faced with this more than obvious truth, but the fact remains that new-atheism is nothing more than another religion: a religion that believes and hopes in the non-existence of God and with a more than radical and fanatical faith. New-atheists have no substantial evidence to support their belief in no-god, whereas Christians have creation itself to explain and justify their belief and faith in God: the universe exists and so do we. The universe is more substantial as evidence for there being a Supernatural Creator than claiming, with the use of fairy-tales (unsubstantiated hypotheses), that the universe and human beings came about through mere chance and mutation (“The Big Bang”, “Natural Selection”): this “reasonable” and “enlightened” (faith-based) version of creation, in my estimation, verges on mental and emotional illness. As any honest scientist will verify, if any still exist, there has never been anything proven to be created out of nothing.}

The new-atheists, agnostics and pagans cry out for separation of church and state, and yet they don’t mind seeking to have the judicial system and government systematically, and covertly, remove the rights of those who believe in the Christ. The new-atheist will claim they despise all religious faiths, but, when it gets down to it, they almost always direct their attacks at the sons and daughters of the One True God.

{Warning, the following may be considered “intolerant”! The reason new-atheists attack Christianity more often than other religions is simple: the Truth of our Lord sticks in the crawl of their god, Satan, and, thus, Satan urges them to attack the sons and daughters of the Living God. Satan knows that all other religions are false, since he helped, with the aid of fallen human beings, to bring them into existence. The new-atheist, needless to say, is totally oblivious to this reality!}

The majority of people can REASON well enough to sense there is a realm beyond the physical or material, a realm where the supernatural exists and rules (evil and good). The REASON man has believed in a supernatural being and Spiritual realm, from the beginning, is due to the fact that the existence of God is evident in the creation. But evidently a small percentage of human beings are so learning disabled, so blind and deaf, they cannot truly sense what surrounds them:

For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. 20For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are WITHOUT EXCUSE. (Romans 1)

…in whose case the god of this world has BLINDED THE MINDS of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. (2 Corinthians 4: 4)

I may be wrong about this woman’s motives, but if I am, she must be either extremely naive, confused or not too bright. Why would any new-atheist, in their right mind (if that’s a possibility), believe they could teach in a religious school system without, sooner or later, being exposed, confronted and held accountable? Perhaps this woman is at a Spiritual crossroad in her life and uncertain of what she believes? If this is the case, then let me say that I am truly sorry for jumping to a false conclusion! You know, a “false conclusion” like, “I can’t see, hear, smell or touch Him, so, therefore, there is no God.”

The fact is, this woman agreed to the terms of a contract to teach in a Catholic school, and, therefore, she is bound by that contract. She must have known that she would be held accountable for her actions outside of the classroom, just as any other contracted teacher, whether in a public, private or parochial school, knows their actions outside of the classroom can adversely affect their career longevity. This is why I believe this woman knew exactly what she was doing.

The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)! (Follow-Up)

J. Craig Venter (Darwinian Megalomaniac) Proclaims, "It's Alive! My 'Synthetic Bacterium' is Alive! There is no God! I'm God"

This is a follow-up post to The Desensitizing & Dehumanizing Affect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics!.

As a former composer, I understand that taking a small segment of existing music (melody, chord progression) and using that small segment to create a new piece of music is not composition (the creation of new music), it is, instead, the “arranging” of music that already exists:

The American Federation of Musicians defines arranging as “the art of preparing and adapting an already written composition for presentation in other than its original form

via Arrangement – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Arranging, then, is different from the creation of new music (composition): musical composing is the act of creating new music. So a composer, in one sense, is a creator, whereas an “arranger” is a person who uses an existing composition to produce a “musical arrangement”.

In much the same way, then, a group of “young Frankensteins” (“genetic scientists”) can take previously created (God breathed) DNA and, with the help of a computer program, ARRANGE it in such a way as to produce, or MAKE (not create), a “synthetic” cell. This arranging of life is not creation, nor does it solve any mystery about life, since the DNA (or DNA model) used for replication, by this computer software, had already been created by the Lord, in the beginning.

On May 20th, 2010, it was announced that a bacterial cell had been “synthetically created”:

May 20, 2010

Researchers say they created a ‘synthetic cell’

by Nicholas Wade

The New York Times

The genome pioneer J. Craig Venter has taken another step in his quest to create synthetic life, by synthesizing an entire bacterial genome and using it to take over a cell.

Dr. Venter calls the result a “synthetic cell” and is presenting the research as a landmark achievement that will open the way to creating useful microbes from scratch to make products like vaccines and biofuels. At a press conference Thursday, Dr. Venter described the converted cell as “the first self-replicating species we’ve had on the planet whose parent is a computer.”

“This is a philosophical advance as much as a technical advance,” he said, suggesting that the “synthetic cell” raised new questions about the nature of life

Other scientists agree that he has achieved a technical feat in synthesizing the largest piece of DNA so far… (emphasis added)

via Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.

Let’s look at the word “synthetic”:

1) Relating to, involving, or of the nature of synthesis.
2) Chemistry. Produced by synthesis, especially not of natural origin.

a) Not natural or genuine; artificial or contrived: “counterfeit rhetoric that flourishes when passions are synthetic” (George F. Will).
b) Prepared or made artificially…

Seems to me this “materialistic scientific” zealot is jumping, as is the case with most Darwinian atheists, to a totally unsubstantiated conclusion: Venter hasn’t created anything, he’s simply taken what the Lord created and ARRANGED it into a “synthetic” form (“not natural or genuine, artificial or contrived”), and with the help of a computer program no less! I don’t believe I remember anything about the Lord needing the help of a computer program to create the entire universe.

"I'm so Alone!"

By this young Frankenstein’s use of the word “synthetic”, he has only succeeded in disqualifying his weak ARRANGEMENT of the Lord’s DNA from being considered “a creation”, according to the original meaning of the word:

Creation:

The divine act by which, according to various religious and philosophical traditions, the world was brought into existence.

When this developmentally arrested, in a philosophical, moral and ethical sense, ne’er-do-well (modern eugenics monster) creates a brand new form of life, alive and functioning, and from scratch (not ARRANGED), then he can claim there is no God, and he is the creator: by “a brand new form of life”, I mean a living cell that comes into existence through the use of something other than DNA (real or “synthetic”). Until he’s created this totally new form of life, Venter simply needs to go back to his Frankenstein lab and merely think of himself as an “ARRANGER” of the Lord’s Creation. That is if Venter doesn’t want his Creator sending a not “synthetically produced” bacterium to cause serious damage to him and his assistant (Igor: “Yes, master!”): you know, like “plagues”, the “wrath of God” stuff!

{Just kidding, the Lord is probably laughing at this overeducated twerp and his little “ARRANGED” cell. In the eyes of the only Creator, Venter is probably just another atheist mouse who is attempting to roar! Or to coin Will Shakespeare: “What fools these mortals be!”}

So, I will close with an “ARRANGEMENT” of an old country hit’s lyrics: “Mothers, don’t let your boys grow up to be Darwinian atheists!” If you do, this will be the result: lab coated socio, psychopaths!