The Atheist Religion’s Primary-Doctrine: Nothing Begot Everything that Exists!

Atheists claim Christians believe in a God they cannot empirically prove the existence of: “Christians believe in a literal six-day creation by a supernatural creator, and they cannot substantiate this belief!” This is just one example of a common comeback from atheists when asked why they seem to despise Christians.

Now, let’s consider what atheists believe. As this sign states, atheists believe that some thing called dark-energy/dark-matter either produced a “big bang,” or was the product of a “big bang” (I’ve heard conflicting accounts about which came first from the folks who adhere to this religion). And this some thing, then, created the universe, where, then, dark-energy/dark-matter’s co-creator, “natural-selection,” took over and made single-cell creatures, flora, fauna, and, lastly, human-beings out of the nothing on earth that came from the nothing from nothing, which they refer to as, the big-bang, dark-energy/dark-matter or vice-versa, depending on which one gives you the speech.

And these self-described “intellectuals” have the nerve to call followers of Christ delusional?

As anyone can see, unless they’re Spiritually blind, what atheists believe is as metaphysical in nature as any faith-based religious-belief, including Christianity. And when a reasonable person asks atheists, “But where did this ‘dark-matter/dark-energy,’ or the material for the ‘big-bang,’ if it came first, come from?” they will never get a straight answer. And the reason for this lack of a straight answer is due to the fact that atheists don’t know, and, therefore, they don’t have a legitimate answer to this question. Atheists make up their religion as they go, as, by the way, do many carnal, apostate Christians.

Atheists can’t answer these questions, since to answer them, either way, would open up the probability of a Designer/Creator, and they can’t have that. If they answer, “I don’t know,” then they admit their belief is faith-based. And if they make up another scenario, then the comeback from the questioner will always be, “So, then, where did this or that material come from?” It’s either, on the part of atheists, an admittance of religious belief, or a total inability to knowledgeably answer the question being asked. They are LITERALLY damed if they do and damned if they don’t, in this situation and everyone from here forward! The Creator/God they refuse to believe in has simply given them over to a DEPRAVED MIND, so they are stuck in this position, continually:

20For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that THEY ARE WITHOUT EXCUSE. 21For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22Professing to be wise, THEY BECAME FOOLS, 23and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures…

28And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a DEPRAVED MIND, to do those things which are not proper… (Romans 1)

“Atheist Materialist-scientists,” the capitalist-corporate owned and operated “scientists”, seem to spend most of their time making up fairy-tale scenarios (filled with multi-syllabic “hypothetical-goo”) rather than paying attention to established scientific-practice: or formulating a hypothesis, and then seeking, with all diligence, to disprove it, so that one may know if his or her hypothesis can be substantiated. In other words, materialist-scientists are much more concerned with pandering their Darwinian/postmodern/atheistic world-view than seeking the truth, scientifically: a world-view that refuses to recognize (or believe in) a Supernatural Designer/Creator:

“There are only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God. There is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation, that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with THE ONLY POSSIBLE CONCLUSION that life arose as A SUPERNATURAL CREATIVE ACT OF GOD. I will not accept that philosophically because I DO NOT WANT TO BELIEVE IN GOD. Therefore, I choose to believe in that WHICH I KNOW IS SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE; spontaneous generation arising to evolution.” (Wald, George, “Innovation and Biology,” Scientific American, Vol. 199, Sept. 1958, p. 100) (emphasis added)

George Wald, a Nobel Prize winner in physiology/medicine, exposes, here, the neurotic nature of atheists, when it comes to the subject of the Lord (Elohim). In Wald’s brilliance, he was so immature, that, even though he discerned the TRUTH of the Lord as Creator, he could not bring himself to accept and embrace his Maker. This, in my estimation, is pure and simple mental/emotional illness, which is the product of a human mind and heart, lacking in Spiritual discernment, that has, unknowingly, chosen Satan over the Creator/Lord and Savior. What Dr. Wald couldn’t comprehend was this fact: at the same time he was arrogantly rejecting the Lord, he was, without any Spiritual discernment whatsoever, automatically choosing to serve and worship the Lord’s enemy, Satan. A person makes a choice, one way or the other, when they choose to reject the Lord, there is no escaping it. If you deny the Lord, then you are automatically choosing Satan as your god. There is no neutral position, no abstaining.

This whole demented-atheistic scenario only reaffirms the scriptural fact that a person’s claim of “belief in God” does not guarantee he or she is a true son or daughter of God:

19You believe that God is one. You do well; the demons also believe, and shudder. (James 2)

George Wald made this comment a half-century ago, and yet the lie of Charles Darwin continues to be perpetrated on school children throughout this world. This just goes to show how powerful Satan (“the father of lies”) is in this world-system he, for now, rules over. These postmodern/Darwinian/atheists certainly don’t wield this kind of power, since, even with all of the unbelief in this world, atheism still only accounts for about 4 to 6% of the world’s population. Actually, when you get down to the numbers, it is apparent that paganism and apostate, organized Christianity have been used more effectively by Satan, than his use of atheism, in keeping people from the Truth and Life of our Lord. After all, over one-third of the people in this world (2.1 billion) profess a belief in God and His Christ. And yet most Christians, due to their apostate “religious” doctrines, and subsequent “religious” actions or lack thereof, do more to keep the unregenerate from the Truth of our Lord and Savior than atheists could have ever dreamed of doing.

True atheism must be such an empty existence. A life without purpose, beyond this screwed-up worldly type, is, in my Spiritual sense, worthless: which, by the way, is the complaint of the Godless existentialist also.

As Socrates wisely proclaimed, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” And yet, ignoring Socrates’ sound advice, atheists, today, refuse to examine the largest portion of life: the invisible/supernatural/Spiritual realm of life that surrounds all of humanity, the universe and beyond. Whether the atheist wants to admit the existence of this supernatural/Spiritual realm or not, doesn’t change the fact that it is here and impacting all of our lives daily. The sodomite says, “We’re here, we’re queer, so get used to it!” Well, I say, The supernatural/Spiritual realm is here, and so near it envelops us, so get used to it, or pay the price later!

There is not one thing that exists in this universe, or beyond, that has ever been made from nothing, and most atheists, whether they’ll admit it or not, are more than aware of this “natural truth”. But they refuse, as Dr. Wald’s comment exposes so blatantly, to believe in what they know, deep inside, to be THE TRUTH. So making up “scientific fairy-tales”, such as dark-energy/dark-matter/the big-bang, “string theories,” and “multi-verses,” etc, only exposes the Spiritually-arrested blind-nature of these atheist-religionists. Atheism, no matter how loud and long atheists protest, is nothing more than just another of man’s faith-based religions:

3And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, 4in whose case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ (2 Corinthians 4)

10For to us God revealed them through the Spirit; for the Spirit searches all things, even the depths of God. 11For who among men knows the thoughts of a man except the spirit of the man which is in him? Even so the thoughts of God no one knows except the Spirit of God. 12Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, so that we may know the things freely given to us by God, 13which things we also speak, not in words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit, combining spiritual thoughts with spiritual words.

14But A NATURAL MAN does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and HE CANNOT UNDERSTAND THEM, because THEY ARE SPIRITUALLY APPRAISED. 15But he who is spiritual appraises all things, yet he himself is appraised by no one. 16For WHO HAS KNOWN THE MIND OF THE LORD, THAT HE WILL INSTRUCT HIM? But we have the mind of Christ. (1 Corinthians 2)

Most of these lost folks have made the choice Dr. Wald made, and so, like him, they will have to answer for their choice on that soon-coming day: a day when there will be no constitution, lawyers, or supreme-court, to fight for their lost-cause, a day when they will bow down, face in the dirt, and receive “the due penalty” for their stubborn rejection of THEIR OWN Creator, Lord and Savior!

P.S.

The following excerpt is from one of my old posts. It was written by Mike Florio, a brother in Christ I met over the internet. I thought I would share it again, since it’s on this topic:

The 10 Commandments of Materialistic Naturalism:

I am Mommy Nature, Who Self-Ascended from the Great Nothing, who created all that is seen and unseen (though the unseen existeth not), who affirms your randomly-generated illusion of the miniscule portion of reality you think you perceive.

Behold:

1. Thou Shalt Love Me with all thy brain synapse firings and chemical reactions (for that is what Love is)

2. Thou Shalt recognize No gods before Me

3. Thou Shalt make an idol of DNA, and shall worship thy genome as an omnipotent agent of “progress”

4. Thou Shalt refer to me as “nurturing” and “clever”, and shall attribute “purpose” to me, though I do have No mind or being

5. Thou Shalt Not attribute to thyself any rationale for rationality, for thou were formed blindly, and by accident

6. Thou Shalt live a Lie, as if concepts of Mind do have inherent meaning, and are not the chemical processes they are, for thou art matter only

7. Thou Shalt believe in Non-Existence, and shall enthusiastically embrace it upon thy Death

8. Thou Shalt cite thy Imagination as Evidence of My Work, and shall do this by drawing fancy pictures of hypothetical ape-like creatures connected by arrows

9. Thou Shalt Believe in Chance, and not refer to it as Ignorance

10. Thou Shalt Not Believe in Moral Absolutes, yet thou shalt also refer to this belief as Good

Behold, I shall send you Messiah, the Holy Scientist who will reveal all, Redeeming all believers and Condemning all Blasphemers to lobotomies!

The Death of Marriage

What has really gotten my attention recently has been the liberal media going after men and women in plural marriages. This is the same liberal media that acted as an advocate for sodomite marriages. I guess, in these warped journalistic minds, two men “hooked-up” is more normal than a man having two or three wives. What moralists these postmodern-atheists be.

But the death of marriage cannot be completely blamed on the liberal, God-hating feminists and sodomites. Heterosexual men and women, who are responsible for the divorce rate being 70% in major US cities, are also to blame, and even more so if you ask me.

Conservative, “God fearing” religionists are in an uproar over same-sex marriage, and mainly because they love the “law,” and the US of A, more than anything else, including the Lord. To these patriotic religionists, all that really matters is that gays are breaking “the law of the land,” and violating the American tradition of marriage being strictly between one man and one woman. Most of these conservative Americans, however, have themselves been married at least two times, and, therefore, when they defend traditional marriage as something sacred, they simply come off as the religious hypocrites they are.

Jesus told the religious leaders of Israel that God had only granted them the decree of divorce because of “the hardness of their heart:”

3Some Pharisees came to Jesus, testing Him and asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?” 4And He answered and said, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, 5and said, ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH’? 6“So they are no longer two, but ONE FLESH. What therefore God has joined together, LET NO MAN SEPARATE.” 7They said to Him, “Why then did Moses command to GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY?” 8He said to them, “Because of YOUR HARDNESS OF HEART Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way. 9“And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another woman COMMITS ADULTERY.” (Matthew 19)

The Lord hates divorce just like He hates any other sin, since sin is the product of His enemy and can, if we let it, separate us from His Way, Truth and Life. It isn’t that, when we sin, the Lord turns His back on us (although we can quench or grieve the Spirit of God in us), it is that when we sin we sense, in ourselves, a separation from Him, because guilt is trying to keep us from His grace. In other words, when we sin, it is us withdrawing from the Lord, not the other way around. We must remember that Christ became sin itself and died on the cross so we may have the freedom to fail (sin), in the eyes of God, and not be torn away from the Lord by guilt. The Father, when He looks at us, sees the perfect righteousness of His Son, not the still imperfect mess we are: this is GRACE! And this grace is available to all, but most, unfortunately, in their arrogance and self-love, will reject it.

Before I go any farther, I must share that I am not a supporter of gay or plural marriage. And I have been married and divorced, so I am as much a part of this problem as any sodomite and radical Mormon. Most of us (men and women, gay or straight, Mormon or Baptist), by our ungodly desires and cowardice, have helped to destroy the Godly nature of marriage, which is defined in the Word of God:

18Then the LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him.” 19Out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name. 20The man gave names to all the cattle, and to the birds of the sky, and to every beast of the field, but for Adam there was not found a helper suitable for him. 21So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh at that place. 22The LORD God fashioned into A WOMAN the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought HER (not him, or them, but “HER”) to the man.

23The man said,
“This is now bone of my bones,
And flesh of my flesh;
She shall be called Woman,
Because she was taken out of Man.”

24For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE (not wives, not husband, but “WIFE”); and they shall become ONE FLESH. 25And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed. (genesis 2)

In our ungodly desire to have everything we want, when we want it, we (“baby-boomers”) have thrown out the baby with the bathwater in many ways, but, in particular, we have destroyed marriage: a marriage between a man and a woman, anchored in the Lord’s love, truth and life.

It is unbelievable to me that the valuing-diversity and to-each-his-own liberal media, after helping to secure sodomite marriage, has now turned to a more conservative, and hypocritical, attitude towards plural marriage. It would seem the far-left/feminist/sodomite/atheists would back any form of marriage that didn’t include a man being with a woman. This is probably due to the hatred these lost souls have for the traditional roles of male and female in this world, as put in place by the Lord. In particular, these depraved-minded folks despise Caucasian-heterosexual males who love the Lord: men who reject the ungodly feminist ways of the sodomite/metro-sexual (“girly-men”), etc.

{I understand that the Jeffs Trial deals with child sexual-abuse, as well as plural marriage, but sex-abuse of children didn’t seem to bother the liberal media when they were supporting gay-marriage. I guess these “well read and enlightened” intellects never talked with people who had been sexually accosted, as a child, by the sodomite priests and nuns of Catholicism? I guess these self-professed geniuses have never heard of THE MAN BOY ASSOCIATION? It seems to me that liberals, who go after pedophiles like they’re the plague, have a tendency to turn a blind-eye to sex-offenses against children when the perpetrators are sodomites: gay/lesbian/bi/trans-gender. I guess, in their warped, “well-read” minds, only heterosexual men can truly be pedophiles?}

Even according to “natural selection,” the sodomite life is unnatural, since men cannot (“naturally”) reproduce with men, nor women with women. I love to here the twisted logic, which spews forth from these folks, when you bring up the subject of homosexuality being abnormal, even according to Darwin’s unsubstantiated hypothesis. If it wasn’t for materialist “science’s” test tubes, donors and surrogates, sodomites would ultimately become extinct, since they lack “the natural ability to reproduce as a species.”

{To clarify, I am not suggesting that the manipulated (test-tube/surrogate route) child of a sodomite couple will be gay because he or she has sodomite “parents”. There will always be sodomites, as long as the Father allows this world and universe to continue on, just as there will always be drug addicts, murderers, crooks and gangs.}

Even Darwin’s insane “theory” will not support the notion that homosexuality is “natural,” and yet self-professed “evolving” sodomites, in their mentally and emotionally ill state, stand on the LIE they have all bought into, and that is, “They were born this way.”

I am sure that the fall of man is responsible for homosexuals’ mental-emotional-sexual aberration, just as it is responsible for every other malady of fallen mankind. But to claim the Lord created them as homosexuals is to take our loving and forgiving Creator and turn Him into a perverse and hateful monster. If the Lord created man to be with man, and woman with woman, then He is not only hateful and cruel, He is also a liar:

18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. 20For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. 21For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22Professing to be wise, THEY BECAME FOOLS, 23and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.

24Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25For they exchanged the truth of God FOR A LIE, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

26For this reason God gave them over to DEGRADING PASSIONS; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons THE DUE PENALTY OF THEIR ERROR. (Romans 1)

This scripture is the proof that men and women are not created to live a life of sexual perversion, whether it be homosexuality, pedophilia, bestiality or adultery. Yes, the fall of man, which is on man, not the Lord, leaves man separated at birth from a personal relationship with his Lord: this is why young children are often, for no apparent reason, hateful, self-serving little creeps. The Lord no more made men and women to lust after people of their own gender than He made adult men and women to lust after children or animals. We choose whether we will accept the Truth of our Lord, or take our chances living a self-involved and perverse life that leads to nothing but misery, here and now, and in the ages to come. The Lord is not hateful, nor is He unforgiving. And the proof of His loving, forgiving, and grace-filled, nature is evident, since we and the universe still exist. But I digress.

The fact is that homosexuals and heterosexuals have helped destroy marriage. So, beyond the issue of child abuse in the FLDS, plural marriage, like sodomite marriage, should be only the business of the consenting adults involved, no matter how many there are. Let’s not be politically hypocritical here, if sodomites can marry now, then there should be nothing standing in the way of plural marriages. Let’s all, like the tolerant, Godless liberals, “value diversity!” You know, “to each his (or her) own!” Or as the unregenerate say, “Let us eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die.”

“The Very Definition of Life on Earth is Changing…”

Mary Shelley, a Prophet?

It has been said that art often imitates life, and I would agree. There are hundreds of movies made every year that deal with life experiences. But it would also appear, from the following article, that life sometimes imitates art.

Genetic Modification Gone Wild: 10 Signs That Our World May Be Destined To Resemble A Really Bad Science Fiction Movie

Did you know that today scientists are actually producing mice that tweet like birds, cats that glow in the dark, “monster salmon”, “spider goats”, cow/human hybrids, pig/human hybrids and even mouse/human hybrids? The very definition of life on earth is changing right before our eyes. Many scientists believe that genetic modification holds the key to feeding the entire planet and healing all of our diseases, but others are warning that genetic modification could literally transform our environment into a desolate wasteland and cause our world to resemble a really bad science fiction movie.

#1 In China, scientists have inserted human genes into the DNA of dairy cow embryos. At this point, approximately 200 hybrid cows have been successfully produced. These cows can produce milk that is virtually identical to human breast milk. The scientists hope to have huge herds of these cows producing an alternative to human breast milk soon, and they hope to have this “milk” sold in global supermarkets within 3 years.

#2 In Canada, scientists at the University of Guelph in the province of Ontario have produced what they are calling “enviropigs“. These “enviropigs” have had genes from mice spliced into them, and according to the scientists they produce less phosphorous in their poop so they are being touted as environmentally friendly. Authorities in both the U.S. and Canada are evaluating whether or not to allow these “enviropigs” into the food supply.

#3 Scientists in Japan have created a genetically modified mouse that tweets like a bird.

#4 One U.S. corporation can now produce a very muscular “monster salmon” which can grow up to three times as fast as normal salmon do.

#5 Science can now produce cats that glow in the dark. A genetically modified cat created by scientists named Mr. Green Genes was the very first fluorescent cat in the United States. But Mr. Green Genes was not the first “glow in the dark cat” in the world. That honor went to a cat created by a team of scientists in South Korea.

#6 In Japan, scientists have discovered that they can grow rat organs inside of mice. The researchers hope to use the same technology to grow human organs inside of pigs.

#7 But Japan is not the only one doing this kind of research. In Missouri, entities that are part pig and part human are being grown with the goal of providing organs for human transplants.

#8 Scientists at Rockefeller University have injected human genes into mice. These “humanized mice” are being used to study the spread of the hepatitis C virus.

#9 U.S. scientists have discovered that they can actually “grow” new human organs from scratch. The following is a quote from a recent Newsweek article….

#10 Believe it or not, a company in Canada known as Nexia has actually taken goats and has genetically modified them to be part spider. The genetic modification process causes these “spider goats” to produce spider silk protein in their milk. This spider silk protein is collected, purified and spun into incredibly strong fibers. These fibers are apparently more durable than Kevlar, more flexible than nylon, and much stronger than steel.

As frightening as all of those examples may sound, the truth is that the genetic modification of plants has gone even farther than the genetic modification of animals has gone.

Today, approximately 93 percent of all soybeans and approximately 80 percent of all corn in the United States have been genetically modified.

Considering the fact that corn is literally in thousands upon thousands of our food products, there is a really good chance that you consumed some genetically modified food today.

Are you certain that it was safe?

Genetically modified crops have been linked to organ disruption in at least 19 different studies.

via Genetic Modification Gone Wild: 10 Signs That Our World May Be Destined To Resemble A Really Bad Science Fiction Movie.

“The very definition of life on earth is changing…” How long should we expect our Father in heaven to wait before He sends His Son, in great power and glory, to put an end to this kind of extreme evil? How long will our Lord allow these perverse megalomaniacs to continue on with the work of Satan? Not even in the days of Noah, before the deluge, were men so brazen, and we know that the Lord, except for Noah and family, destroyed them all.

As with Mary Shelley’s deranged doctor, materialistic “scientists,” today, have become insane with power: a power they cannot begin to comprehend or control. These so-called “scientists,” who worship at the alter of man’s “reason,” and his “brave new world” (brave new delusion), cannot reason, cannot discern, that they are trespassing on sacred ground, where even the fallen-angels fear to tread: the sacred ground that belongs solely to the Creator of all things. These “scientists” are simply, as Dr. Frankenstein was, playing God, and that, needless to say, is a recipe for disaster.

It is one thing for man to seek to circumvent the Adamic curse (Genesis, Chapter 3), he has been doing that since he was removed from “the garden,” but it is quite a different and dangerous thing for man to believe, based on his minuscule knowledge of DNA, that he is equal with his Creator Who created DNA/Life. Materialistic “scientists” are like an impudent child who discovers he can produce fire with two pieces of wood and immediately, because of his arrogant-ignorance of fire’s potential harm, burns down every house in his neighborhood, including his own.

“A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.” And this is what man possesses, “a little knowledge,” plus a gigantic, out-of-control ego. It is amazing to me how these so-called “scientists” can be so dead to the Truth, so dead to reality. Their problem is this:

The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed. (Albert Einstein)

The things most “scientists” are in “awe” of, today, are themselves, their intellect and knowledge. In their unwarranted pompousness, they fail to see what Einstein saw so clearly, even in his agnostic state, and that is, there is more to the universe, the creation, than that which can be seen with the naked eye and discerned with the finite mind.

Christ warns us of how the days will be just before His return:

3As He was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things happen, and what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?”

4And Jesus answered and said to them, “See to it that no one misleads you. 5“For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will mislead many. 6“You will be hearing of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not frightened, for those things must take place, but that is not yet the end. 7“For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and in various places there will be famines and earthquakes. 8“But all these things are merely the beginning of birth pangs.

9“Then they will deliver you to tribulation, and will kill you, and you will be hated by all nations because of My name. 10“At that time many will fall away and will betray one another and hate one another. 11“Many false prophets will arise and will mislead many. 12“Because lawlessness is increased, most people’s love will grow cold. 13“But the one who endures to the end, he will be saved. 14“This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all the nations, and then the end will come.

32“Now learn the parable from the fig tree: when its branch has already become tender and puts forth its leaves, you know that summer is near; 33so, you too, when you see all these things, recognize that He is near, right at the door. 34“Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place. 35“Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will not pass away.

36“But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone. 37“For the coming of the Son of Man will be just like the days of Noah. 38“For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, 39and they did not understand until the flood came and took them all away; so will the coming of the Son of Man be. 40“Then there will be two men in the field; one will be taken and one will be left. 41“Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken and one will be left.

42“Therefore be on the alert, for you do not know which day your Lord is coming. (Matthew 24)

Disqualified as a Teacher, by the Word of God (1 Timothy, Chapter 3)

Don’t believe your priest, pastor, or reverend, the Gospel of the Kingdom has been preached throughut the whole world: South American and African tribes, in the remotest parts of those continents, have had contact with people from the west and thus missionaries. Many of these tribes have even heard of major celebrities and have digital devices to hear and know what is happening throughout the rest of the world. Don’t let the Christian religionists fool you. I have seen, in the last ten years, religious (manipulated) maps showing the areas where the Kingdom of God has not been preached. These were the same maps, or at least maps with the same information, that I had been privy to twenty five years ago. Organized Christianity doesn’t want the Gospel of the Kingdom preached in all the world, since that would mean an end to its religious careers/income, its need for respect and admiration, and, of course, the world-system that supports it. The nominal “church” “preaches” Christ’s second coming, but it is the last thing this false “church” wants to happen. Like the unregenerate/pagan, Christian religionists believe (and hope) that all will continue as it has for the last two-thousand years:

3Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come with their mocking, following after their own lusts, 4and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all continues just as it was from the beginning of creation.” 5For when they maintain this, it escapes their notice that by the word of God the heavens existed long ago and the earth was formed out of water and by water, 6through which the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water. 7But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.

8But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day. 9The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance. (2 Peter 3)

{When it comes to the return of our Lord, organized Christianity (“churchianity”) seems to have a great deal in common with the Hebrew authorities of two-thousand years ago: Jesus was not the Messiah the Hebrew leaders (“The Sanhedrin”) were looking for, even though their scrolls predicted Him just as He came. What our Lord preached to the Hebrew authorities, as well as most of the common Hebrews, was totally contrary to their worldly desires. If Jesus hadn’t come to conquer the Romans, and set up Israel as the ruling Kingdom on earth, then most of the Hebrews wanted no part of Him; to the extent that they were willing to have Him murdered on a Roman cross. I have no doubt that, if Jesus were to appear today, as He did the first time, organized Christianity would respond to Him in the same way as the Hebrews, even to the point of having Him murdered!}

Getting back to the subject at hand, read the old testament and you will find that the Lord is very patient and loving, but He has a limit to His patience. And when man’s overwhelming arrogance, blatant idolatry, extreme evil, and absolute denial of Him and His Son, have finally surpassed His patience, then our Lord’s wrath will be released, and this time, for the very last time. We have been living in the age of His favor, His grace, up until now:

1And working together with Him, we also urge you not to receive the grace of God in vain—

2for He says,
“AT THE ACCEPTABLE TIME I LISTENED TO YOU,
AND ON THE DAY OF SALVATION I HELPED YOU.”
Behold, now is “THE ACCEPTABLE TIME,” behold, now is “THE DAY OF SALVATION”— (2 Corinthians 6)

But this “acceptable time” is drawing to a close, or, perhaps, has already elapsed.

Daniel was given a vision of the time we are living in:

1“Now at that time Michael, the great prince who stands guard over the sons of your people, will arise. And there will be a time of distress such as never occurred since there was a nation until that time; and at that time your people, everyone who is found written in the book, will be rescued. 2“Many of those who sleep in the dust of the ground will awake, these to everlasting life, but the others to disgrace and everlasting contempt. 3“Those who have insight will shine brightly like the brightness of the expanse of heaven, and those who lead the many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever. 4“But as for you, Daniel, conceal these words and seal up the book until the end of time; many will go back and forth, and knowledge will increase.” (Daniel 12)

“Many will go back and forth, and knowledge will increase.” Man can fly around the world in a matter of hours. And a few men have even visited the moon. With the invention of the internet, billions upon billions of bits of information can now travel around the world in milliseconds. In just the last one-hundred and fifty years, man’s knowledge has increased so rapidly that, if it were displayed as a time-line, the six-thousand preceding years would be a horizontal line measuring, perhaps, twenty-four inches in length, but the last two centuries (the 19th and 20th) would be a vertical line so tall it would be difficult to measure. In Daniel’s time, this kind of movement around the world, and increase in knowledge, would have been an impossibility.

This increase in knowledge has, I believe, made man mentally and emotionally unstable. As man’s knowledge has increased, it has become apparent that his ability to reason has all but faded away: picture an “absent-minded professor” so caught up in his vain imaginings that reality has almost totally eluded him. He is a knowledgeable (“natural”) man, in a strictly worldly sense, but he has no clue as to what life is truly about, since he cannot discern the Spiritual realm that surrounds him:

14But a natural (unregenerate) man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised…“ (1 Corinthians 2)

This man, needless to say, is dead to the TRUTH of God and is, therefore, ruled by an evil entity, an evil entity he doesn’t even believe exists. This man is delusional and lost.

How long will it be before these modern day Dr. Frankensteins, these arrogant absentminded professors, come to the conclusion they are gods and thus sense they have the right to clone human beings? Of course, the cloning of a human being would not truly be an act of creation, since cloning would involve the use of existing DNA created by the Lord: as arranging of an existing piece of music will never be an act of composing, so cloning of a human being will never be an act of creation. The real problem here is that cloning a soulless, mindless sheep is one thing, but man has a spirit and mind, as well as a body (all three equal a soul), and was made in the image of God.

26Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. (Genesis 1: 26)

Then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life (spirit); and man became a living being (soul). (Genesis 2: 7)

These Godless “scientists” might be able to reproduce a man in body form, but how will they impart to their creature a soul: they can, perhaps, produce the cognitive and motor skill portion of man, but what about the affective domain? If they should clone a human being, then he or she will be devoid of compassion for others, the ability to love, since love is of God:

15Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God abides in him, and he in God. 16We have come to know and have believed the love which God has for us. GOD IS LOVE, and the one who abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him. 17By this, love is perfected with us, so that we may have confidence in the day of judgment; because as He is, so also are we in this world. 18There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear, because fear involves punishment, and the one who fears is not perfected in love. 19WE LOVE, BECAUSE HE FIRST LOVE US. (1 John 4)

Unregenerate man is bad enough, with the few attributes of the Creator he possesses, but what would cloned, soulless (completely Godless) man be like? An arranged piece of music sounds, to some extent, like the original, but what is missing is the composer’s (creator’s) inspired substance (his original inspiration, his intention) embedded in the music: thus the arrangement, no matter how brilliant, is a mere shadow of the composition’s (creation’s) original form and substance, as envisioned and heard by the composer (creator). Even more so, then, a human being cloned by Godless individuals would be a mere shadow (a mere arrangement) of the Creator’s inspiration, His intention, in His created ones. Man is involved in something, here, he is not prepared to deal with!

So, then, the definition of life on earth might be changing, but the new definition may not have a real chance to get settled in before the wrath of the Lord turns it, along with the rest of this decaying world, into ashes. “As in the days of Noah,” the Lord’s grace will come to an end, and then will come the fulfillment of prophecy, which many asleep-in-the-pew Christians will not be prepared for.

I am not writing this post to the hardcore, God-hating unregenerate, nor do I care what he or she thinks, professes or believes. I have no Spiritual leading, at this moment, to preach Christ to those who have already made their ill-advised choice in this life: an ill-advised choice to love and serve themselves and this corrupt, evil world-system. I am led, instead, to write to the believer in Christ who has never truly sought the Lord out on his own, but has, instead, allowed a religious system to keep him away from the Lord and His Spiritual life in abundance; not that I am already fully basking in His abundance of life, but I am closer now than I was when jumping through the religious hoops of organized, nominal Christianity!

For those of you out there sensing something missing from your “religious” experience, and knowing that something missing is the Lord, the Spirit, and the Life, come out and away from that deadness and find the Lord, His remnant and Life.

The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)! (Follow-Up #2)

Planned Parenthood's Heritage

This is a follow-up post to The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)! and The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)! (Follow-Up)

The following quote is from a book entitled, War Against the Weak, by Edwin Black:

In the first three decades of the 20th Century, American corporate philanthropy combined with prestigious academic fraud to create the pseudoscience eugenics that institutionalized race politics as national policy. The goal: create a superior, white, Nordic race and obliterate the viability of everyone else. How? By identifying so-called “defective” family trees and subjecting them to legislated segregation and sterilization programs. The victims: poor people, brown-haired white people, African Americans, immigrants, Indians, Eastern European Jews, the infirm and really anyone classified outside the superior genetic lines drawn up by American raceologists. The main culprits were the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune, in league with America’s most respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as Harvard, Yale and Princeton, operating out of a complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island. The eugenic network worked in tandem with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the State Department and numerous state governmental bodies and legislatures throughout the country, and even the U.S. Supreme Court. They were all bent on breeding a eugenically superior race, just as agronomists would breed better strains of corn. The plan was to wipe away the reproductive capability of the weak and inferior. Ultimately, 60,000 Americans were coercively sterilized — legally and extra-legally. Many never discovered the truth until decades later. Those who actively supported eugenics include America’s most progressive figures: Woodrow Wilson, MARGARET SANGER, and Oliver Wendell Holmes who ruled on the infamous Carrie Buck trial and declared “three generations of imbeciles is enough.”

[MARGARET SANGER: one of the founders of Planned Parenthood]

American eugenic crusades proliferated into a worldwide campaign, and in the 1920s came to the attention of Adolf Hitler. Under the Nazis, American eugenic principles were applied without restraint, careening out of control into the Reich’s infamous genocide. During the pre-War years, American eugenicists OPENLY SUPPORTED Germany’s program. The Rockefeller Foundation financed the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute and the work of its central racial scientists. Once WWII began, Nazi eugenics turned from mass sterilization and euthanasia to genocidal murder. One of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute doctors in the program financed by the Rockefeller Foundation was Josef Mengele who continued his research in Auschwitz, making daily eugenic reports on twins. After the world recoiled from Nazi atrocities, the American eugenics movement — its institutions and leading scientists — renamed and regrouped under the banner of an enlightened science called HUMAN GENETICS. (emphasis mine)

via War Against The Weak – Home Page.

The Nordic/Aryan Ideal: "The Fit for Life"

If you think eugenics is dead and gone, then think again! Remember, over the past few years, hearing about “designer babies” on the news? “Designer babies:” where parents can select the human traits they want in their child before conception? This is just another example of an ungodly, perverse product of eugenics (genetic research). Here is a recent news article that reveals the long-term, deleterious effects of eugenics, physically, mentally, and emotionally, on the human beings who have been ravaged by it:

North Carolina hearing explores history of forced sterilization – CNN.com

(CNN) — Deborah Chesson spoke through tears Wednesday as she addressed a North Carolina task force on behalf of her mother.

“I’m writing you with hopes that you will understand the pain, hurt and emptiness I still feel inside,” she read.

“A social worker convinced my mom to sign for me to undergo an operation that would prevent me from getting pregnant, not knowing all the while that I was being set up to be sterilized like I was some kind of animal.”

Dozens of North Carolina citizens spoke at the public hearing against the state’s five-decade forced sterilization program. The listening session, held by the governor’s task force, gave victims the opportunity to share their experiences with a state task force charged with recommending compensation for victims and their families.

Eugenics is the process of selectively breeding humans and animals to rid the population of “unfit” characteristics. In 1933, North Carolina passed a revised eugenics law. The law established the North Carolina Eugenics Board, which largely targeted low-income females for sterilization procedures. (emphasis mine)

via North Carolina hearing explores history of forced sterilization – CNN.com.

And here is yet another example of this Darwinian/atheistic plague, but this time it’s Al Gore and his buddies at the United Nations planning an Aryan/Nordic Utopia:

This population control agenda is also reflected in official UN documents.

The following is language from a UN resolution that was adopted by the UN General Assembly that was designed to further the implementation of Agenda 21….

“….population growth rates have been declining globally, largely as a result of expanded basic education and health care. That trend is projected to lead to a stable world population in the middle of the twenty-first century… The current decline in population growth rates must be further promoted through national and international policies that promote economic development, social development, environmental protection, and poverty eradication, particularly the further expansion of basic education, with full and equal access for girls and women, and health care, including reproductive health care, including both family planning and sexual health, consistent with the report of the International Conference on Population and Development.”

Most Americans don’t grasp it yet, but the truth is that the global elite are absolutely obsessed with population control. In fact, there is a growing consensus among the global elite that they need to get rid of 80 to 90 percent of us. (emphasis mine)

via Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control.

We must face the fact that eugenics is still alive and well. The Nordic/Aryan ideology that gave license to the forced sterilization, torture (“medical experimentation”), and murder, of 18 million people in Europe, during W.W.II, is still thriving in the world today. We could, if we tried real hard, delude ourselves into believing excrement smells like a rose, but sooner or later, when we leaned down to smell it, we would know it is nothing more than excrement. In much the same way, then, we can delude ourselves into believing Planned Parenthood (abortion central) and genetic research have nothing to do with ungodly and perverse eugenics, but, when we get close enough to really look at and smell Planned Parenthood and genetic research, we should be capable of discerning that it is nothing more than ungodly and perverse eugenics in disguise!

God is not mocked. There is a day of reckoning coming, where all will be held accountable for what they have done in this life, good and bad:

Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap. (Galatians 6: 7)

For more on the subject of eugenics and Planned Parenthood, you can read here:

tolbert_plannedparenthood_targets.pdf (application/pdf Object).

The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)!

I happened across one of the pop “science” channels and there sat this evolutionary psychologist proclaiming, in an obnoxiously atheistic and authoritative tone, that “the human animal” was never intended to be monogamous. According to this Darwinian “intellect”, an “evolving human animal seeks to be joined” (to mate) and yet the “human animal” is “an adulterer at heart”. Why are human beings “adulterers at heart”? According to this over-educated purveyor of postmodern (unsubstantiated) propaganda, human beings are nothing more than advanced primates who have little or no control of themselves or their actions. Human beings (“the human animal”), according to this Spiritually dead hack and quack, have no basis for civilized behavior, beyond, of course, that which “natural-selection” has, through mutation and chance (evolution), alloted them.

{In a little over one hundred and fifty years, these Darwinian lab-coated and pocket-protecting atheists have taken the sanctity and beauty of human life, a life created by God, and transformed it into a seething cesspool existence (“Darwin’s primordial soup”) where everything is “relative” and there is no absolute truth.}

This kind of atheistic/”scientific” propaganda has a desensitizing effect: if totally held as a belief, this “theory” will dehumanize other human beings in the minds and hearts of those believing the lie. When a person with no real substantiated evidence becomes convinced that he or she is little more than a mutated-by-chance chimpanzee, then along with their own life other people’s lives become devalued in their hearts and minds. This devaluing of human life, then, can open the door to all kinds of evil in the name of “science” and “humanity”: a “science” under the guise of “progress” (myths) that in the end harms more than benefits humanity.

Introduction

Voices haunt the pages of every book. This particular book, however, speaks for the never-born, for those whose questions have never been heard for those who never existed.

Throughout the first six decades of the twentieth century, hundreds of thousands of Americans and untold numbers of others were not permitted to continue their families by reproducing. Selected because of their ancestry, national origin, race or religion, they were forcibly sterilized, wrongly committed to mental institutions where they died in great numbers, prohibited from marrying, and sometimes even unmarried by state bureaucrats. In America, this battle to wipe out whole ethnic groups was fought not by armies with guns nor by hate sects at the margins. Rather, this pernicious white-gloved war was prosecuted by esteemed professors, elite universities, wealthy industrialists and government officials colluding in a racist, pseudoscientific movement called EUGENICS. The purpose: create a superior Nordic race.

To perpetuate the campaign, widespread academic fraud combined with almost unlimited corporate philanthropy to establish the biological rationales for persecution. Employing a hazy amalgam of guesswork, gossip, falsified information and polysyllabic academic arrogance, the eugenics movement slowly constructed a national bureaucratic and juridical infrastructure to cleanse America of its unfit. Specious intelligence tests, colloquially known as IQ tests, were invented to justify incarceration of a group labeled feebleminded. Often the so-called feebleminded were just shy, too good-natured to be taken seriously, or simply spoke the wrong language or were the wrong color. Mandatory sterilization laws were enacted in some twenty-seven states to prevent targeted individuals from reproducing more of their kind. Marriage prohibition laws proliferated throughout the country to stop race mixing. Collusive litigation was taken to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sanctified eugenics and its tactics.

The goal was to immediately sterilize fourteen million people in the United States and millions more worldwide the lower tenth and then continuously eradicate the remaining lowest tenth until only a pure Nordic super race remained. Ultimately, some 60,000 Americans were coercively sterilized and the total is probably much higher. No one knows how many marriages were thwarted by state felony statutes. Although much of the persecution was simply racism, ethnic hatred and academic elitism, EUGENICS wore the mantle of respectable science to mask its true character. (emphasis added)

via War Against the Weak – Introduction.

Eugenics, a pseudo-scientific/ideological aberration of Darwin’s half-cousin, Francis Galton, was the bastard child of Darwin’s racist tendencies and unsubstantiated hypothesis (“natural selection”). Eugenics is the “common ancestor”, the “founding father”, of today’s modern genetics (stem cell “research”, and a popular form of “selective breeding”, “designer babies”): a morally questionable at best “science” that thrives in this hedonistic country, as well as the rest of the world. Through this manipulative renaming, eugenics has merely been dressed up in a more “politically-correct”, “tolerant” and less objectionable garb (genetics); a garb that seeks to cover up the ungodly elitist hatred and bigotry, the dirty underwear, that is at the heart and soul of eugenics.

One can sprinkle flowers and perfume on cow manure in order to make it look and smell better, but if he or she gets real close and digs real deep he or she will find that it still looks and smells like bovine excrement. In the same sense, a pile of unsubstantiated hypothetical excrement by any other name still smells like “bad science”!

This kind of desensitizing and life-devaluing propaganda (evolution/eugenics/genetics) has been perpetrated on every child attending American public schools for the last three-quarters of a century or more. Is it any wonder, with this in mind then, that American public school students, over the past twenty years, have made the evening news for mass murdering felllow students and teachers in their high schools. Is it any wonder, then, that prior to the nineteenth century (before Darwin) there were no records of “serial killers” to be found anywhere in the world? Is it any wonder, then, that in America alone Darwinian-indoctrinated doctors, over the past thirty-plus-years, have “legally” (Roe v. Wade) murdered hundreds of millions of unborn babies (“abortion”)?

{Unborn children, alive in their mother’s wombs, torn apart by chemicals and surgical instruments (“aborted”), and for the sole purpose of granting an immature and promiscuous woman’s “right of choice”. A “woman’s right of choice” to escape the ultimate penalty for responding to her sexual desire like a female animal “in heat”: an “unwanted pregnancy”, a truly inconvenient truth. Why wouldn’t a “liberated” woman respond this way? After all, the feminist/lesbian/atheists, like the psychologist above, have pounded into women’s minds, during the last forty-plus years, that their bodies belong to them, and therefore, they have the “right” to do with them as they see fit, no matter how heinous the outcome. “Liberated” women have become desensitized and dehumanized to the point that their unborn children have become nothing more to them than unwanted inanimate objects: unwanted inanimate objects euphemistically referred to as “embryos” and “fetuses”. The maternal qualities that God built into women are all but gone now, and like men, women, today, are truly less than the human beings their Creator created them to be.}

Is it any wonder, then, that Hitler, seven decades ago, was able to find a “scientific rationalization” through evolution and eugenics for the mass murder of millions of people (literally) branded as “inferior races”? Is it any wonder, then, that other nations in Europe since Hitler have followed his example by seeking to “ethnically cleanse”, through mass murder, their countries of the inconvenience of “the unfit for life”?

…one of Hitler’s favorite sayings was, “POLITICS IS APPLIED BIOLOGY“. Hitler’s ideas of racial purity led to unprecedented atrocities in Europe. Since then, ethnic cleansing has occurred in Cambodia, the Balkans, Sudan, and Rwanda. In one sense, ethnic cleansing is another name for the tribal warfare and mass murder that has afflicted human society for ages, but these crimes seem to gain intensity when believed to be SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED. (emphasis added)

via Social interpretations of race – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

“POLITICS IS APPLIED BIOLOGY.” In other words, since the “human animal” has evolved and is, therefore, nothing more than a mutated-by-chance ancestor of a chimp, then it is, in a political sense, expendable: “Since there is no sacredness or eternal value to life, the disposal of certain breeds of ‘the human animal’ (ethnicities, races) can be politically and socially expedient!” Note also that, according to this author, these kinds of “crimes intensify when believed to be SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED”. Has there ever been a more SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED (and unsubstantiated) hypothesis as “natural selection”?

When we become desensitized to the sanctity of life, then we open the door for the devaluing of our own lives and those around us; we begin the long disastrous journey toward the dehumanization of ourselves and everyone else. This perverse kind of postmodern/atheistic coercion can be rather subtle at first: the introduction of “scientific” theories, as unsubstantiated as they may be, and the use of terms and phrases (euphemisms) such as “common ancestor,” “natural selection,” “survival of the fittest,” “the human animal,” “embryos,” “zygotes,” “fetuses,” the “feeble-minded,” and the “UNFIT FOR LIFE,” can lull us into a Godless stupor where life of any kind is no longer reverenced.

Bald-faced liars didn’t start out that way: they started out with little fibs that got more and more involved, which then lead to more elaborate lies until one day they couldn’t tell the difference between the lies and reality. The loss of integrity can happen in much the same manner: a person starts with one little lie to the boss, or the pilfering of money from the safe, but after a while the lies become bolder and the theft increases until that initial small crack in integrity has turned into a Grand Canyon of lies and thievery. A “scientific theory” can begin with a flawed hypothesis and, unless corrected or thrown out, can then grow into a bald-faced lie put forth as truth; and in the end, this unsubstantiated “theory” (bald-faced lie) can end up doing more harm than it ever did good; such is the case with evolution and eugenics/genetics, whether we are willing to face the facts or not!

If we’re not careful, then, we can become like frogs in a frying pan: a frog placed in a frying pan filled with water and set at a low temperature, which is then slowly increased, will sit there totally unaware and seemingly unaffected until he is completely cooked through. In a similar manner, most people will sit quietly by while listening to and believing every unsubstantiated “scientific theory” put forth by lab-coated “geniuses” until these so-called “theories” have totally obliterated their ability to reason.

Hitler didn’t start out in the early 1930′s by suggesting the mass-murder of millions of Jews, gypsies and homosexuals. No, he started out with subtle and subliminal language (“theories” and ideologies) that would slowly but surely indoctrinate and blind the German people to the truth of what he was about to do.

In conclusion, do we really know and understand what lies at the heart and agenda of eugenics/genetic research today? Do we really know and understand why an unsubstantiated hypothesis (“natural selection”), by an emotionally and religiously confused man (Darwin), is being thrust on our children: in the public schools, by the government, and on every television channel and news program? If the “theory of evolution” is as airtight as the Darwinian lab-coats claim, then why are they so fearful of an alternative to their religious dogma: why are they so against the teaching of “intelligent design” and creationism in the public schools? Why do these Darwinian lab-coats fight so vehemently against a simple parenthetical clause in science textbooks that states, “Evolution is merely a hypothesis that many scientists disagree with.” If they’re so sure of themselves and what they believe to be true, then why are they so afraid?

{A liar doesn’t want others delving deep into his lies, nor does he want the truth exposing his lies!}

Are these politically powerful, Darwinian lab-coats so afraid of their weak hypothesis that they don’t want it scrutinized in any way? I thought good scientific practice amounted to treating any hypothesis as being false until all information contained in the hypothesis could be thoroughly substantiated through scientific scrutiny? I guess this kind of science (science seeking the truth) has either become rare or non-existent in the world today?

Those of us with children, who also have faith in the Lord, should keep them from being indoctrinated in this bald-faced and bad-science fabrication: science and knowledge are not evil, but educational indoctrination and bad science are! From the beginning of life, the education of children is not the responsibility of the ungodly state, it’s the responsibility of the parents! Education is a responsibility that, since the inception of public education, has been shirked by almost all parents, except, of course, those who have chosen to embrace their parental responsibilities by homeschooling their children.

Do we want our children to grow up believing that their ancestors were puke-eating chimpanzees? Do we want our children to value the sanctity and preciousness of created life, whether it be a kitten, robin or another child? Then we best be speaking to our children, while we still have the authority and opportunity, about the lies being perpetrated by the atheistic powers that rule this world system!

From a Lie to the Truth! (Follow-up)

Ever notice how Darwinian/naturalist-atheists claim there is no “scientific proof” for the existence of an intelligent designer (God)? And yet, when blatantly shown there is no substantiated “scientific proof” for the existence of (macro) evolution either, they simply make up fairy tale scenarios with multi-syllabic terms to convince (proselytize) the great multitude of doubters (78% of Americans, according to a recent MSNBC poll) that their god (“natural selection”) does truly exist. There seems to be a bit of inconsistency on the part of Darwinian/naturalist-atheists, but, then again, why would we expect anything different from a group of people who deny the very real Spiritual universe that surrounds them?

Here, then, are two more articles that speak of the deluded state of Darwinian/naturalist-atheists (materialists).

When Nothing Created Everything

JOE CARTER

I’ve decided to take the elements of materialism and shape them into a purportedly accurate, though mythic, narrative. This is what our culture has been missing for far too long – a creation story for young atheistic materialists.

Throughout history people have been awed and thrilled by retellings of their culture’s creation story.

Aztecs would tell of the Lady of the Skirt of Snakes, Phoenicians about the Zophashamin, and Jews and Christians about the one true God – Jehovah. But there is one unfortunate group – the children of atheistic materialists – that has no creation myth to call its own. When an inquisitive tyke asks who created the sun, the animals, and mankind, their materialist parents can only tell them to read a book by Carl Sagan or Richard Dawkins.

But what sort of story are they likely to find? Should they be told, as famed astrophysicist Stephen Hawking claims in his recent book The Grand Design that “the universe… create[d] itself from nothing”?

Since Hawking’s explanation is a bit too drab and nospecific for bedtime reading I’ve decided to take the elements of materialism and shape them into a purportedly accurate, though mythic, narrative. This is what our culture has been missing for far too long – a creation story for young atheistic materialists.

In the beginning was Nothing, and Nothing created Everything. When Nothing decided to create Everything, she filled a tiny dot with Time, Chance, and Everything and had it expand. The expansion spread Everything into Everywhere carrying Time and Chance with it to keep it company. The three stretched out together leaving bits of themselves wherever they went. One of those places was the planet Earth…

And that is why, children, when Man loses his Life he goes from being a Something created by Time and Chance into becoming like his creator – Nothing.

You can find the rest of this article here:

via When Nothing Created Everything.

Unreasonable Doubt

The reasons for unbelief are more complex than many atheists let on.

Jim Spiegel | posted 2/10/2011 09:28AM

Related articles and links | [no previous page] 1 of 3 [next page]

ADVERTISEMENT

Have A New Kid By Friday

The recent publication of Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow’s The Grand Design has reignited debate over God’s existence. The ironically titled book proposes that the cosmos was spontaneously generated “from nothing,” with no God (or gods) required to make sense of existence. Never mind the question-begging: How can nothing produce something, let alone hundreds of billions of galaxies? Many atheists celebrate this bestseller as further grounds for dismissing religious belief.

Most atheists would have us think they arrived at their view through cool, rational inquiry. But are other factors involved? Consider the candid remarks of contemporary philosopher Thomas Nagel: “I want atheism to be true …. It isn’t just that I don’t believe in God, and, naturally, hope that I’m right about my belief. It’s that I hope there is no God! I don’t want there to be a God; I don’t want the universe to be like that.” Could Nagel’s attitude—albeit in a more subtle form—actually be common among atheists?

via Unreasonable Doubt | Christianity Today | A Magazine of Evangelical Conviction.

From a Lie to the Truth!

Below is a post from the site Uncommon Descent. I found this post interesting, so I thought I would share it with all of you.

The top three books that helped change me from a mindless, irrational Darwinist into an ID proponent

#1 Evolution, A Theory in Crisis

I was arguing with a (yes, Christian) friend named Dave, about “evolution,” and told him that science had proven that in the primordial seas, once upon a time, a self-replicating molecule came about, and then random changes filtered through natural selection eventually produced all of life. This is what I was taught all my life, having grown up in an academic community infested with “scientists” who told me that any other interpretation of origins was evidence of mindless religious fanaticism.

Dave said, “Don’t trust me, read Michael Denton’s book.” I read it in two days, and exclaimed to myself: “Unholy Crap, I’ve been conned!” (By the way, as best I can figure, Denton is an atheist or at least an agnostic, and has no theological axe to grind.) Interestingly enough, it was this book that first inspired Michael Behe to have doubts about Darwinian orthodoxy.

#2 Darwin On Trial

In this work, Phillip Johnson, an attorney with an extraordinarily sharp mind, elucidates the deceptive and manipulative techniques employed by Darwinists to obfuscate, distort, and use selective evidence to defend the indefensible.

#3 Darwin’s Black Box

In this book Michael Behe lays the foundation for the discovery (which should have been evident all along, ever since the realization that the DNA molecule is an information-encoding system) that life at the most fundamental level is the product of engineered technology. I’ve read the rebuttals to Behe by the most prominent Darwinists, and they are universally desperate attempts that don’t even address his challenges, but change the subject to protein-sequence similarities and other irrelevancies.

via The top three books that helped change me from a mindless, irrational Darwinist into an ID proponent | Uncommon Descent.

“We Understand Nothing”

Crying Wolf, Once Again!

The above image shows two different Time Magazine covers: one from the ’70s (on the left), when so-called “scientists” were claiming a “man-made ice age” was imminent, and the other from a current issue warning of the “impending doom” that will supposedly be caused by a “man-made global warming”, or “global climate change” (take your pick). Both of these magazine covers, in my estimation, only serve to reveal the extreme exaggerations, or bald-faced lies, of the “scientific” materialists: exaggerations and bald-faced lies that have much more to do with manipulative corporate greed, and postmodern religious-dogma, than “saving the planet”.

Below is a quote from an article a close friend sent me. The author of this article (Fred Reed) definitely knows how to cut to the chase and not pull punches:

“The immense beingness of a dark forest, the tens of millions of things—winged things, crawling things, hunting things, plants and moss and mold, soft hungry things in decomposing logs, ants, moths with huge spectral eyes, all in the intricate endless dance of life—these we do not know; we say chitinous exoskeleton and Gibb’s free energy and adenosine triphosphate and Darwin, AND BELIEVE WE UNDERSTAND WHEN WE UNDERSTAND NOTHING, NOT WHENCE NOR WHITHER NOR WHY NOR HOW…

There are scholars who believe, much to the chagrin of today’s Darwinian/atheistic anthropologists, that the earliest peoples on earth (antediluvians) were far superior to modern man: physically, intellectually and technologically (see Earth’s Earliest Ages: G.H. Pember). But these advanced human beings (not the materialists’ little green Martians) were never so arrogant as to believe they had all the answers to life.

But, as this author hints, people, today, are so in love with themselves, so full of “self-esteem”, so “self-actualized”, that they, in their adolescent-egocentric and hedonistic stupor, claim to know and understand almost everything; when, in reality, they know and “understand nothing”.

Here is how Solomon described mans’ arrogant pursuit of knowledge and wisdom:

2 “Vanity of vanities,” says the Preacher,
“Vanity of vanities! All is vanity.”

3 What advantage does man have in all his work
Which he does under the sun?

12 I, the Preacher, have been king over Israel in Jerusalem. 13 And I set my mind to seek and explore by wisdom concerning all that has been done under heaven. It is a grievous task which God has given to the sons of men to be afflicted with. 14 I have seen all the works which have been done under the sun, and behold, ALL IS VANITY AND STRIVING AFTER THE WIND. 15 What is crooked cannot be straightened and what is lacking cannot be counted.

16 I said to myself, “Behold, I have magnified and increased wisdom more than all who were over Jerusalem before me; and my mind has observed a wealth of wisdom and knowledge.” 17 And I set my mind to know wisdom and to know madness and folly; I realized that this also is striving after wind. 18 Because in much wisdom there is much grief, and increasing knowledge results in increasing pain. (Ecclesiastes 1)

Solomon, in the wisdom the Lord had granted him, understood that man can only attain to so much temporal (earthly) knowledge and wisdom, and, after that point, man’s endeavors to understand himself and his surroundings become nothing more than a vain pursuit, a chasing after the wind.

This chasing after the wind is the very picture of the postmodern/Darwinian/atheist (postmodern religionists). These postmodern religionists have a minuscule – at best – knowledge of the earth, solar system and universe, and they run with this infinitesimal bit of knowledge as if they were gods who know everything. Like an overconfident child, these “enlightened” megalomaniacs make extravagant claims about things they can’t even begin to comprehend. For instance, they claim that the universe came into existence by means of a “Big Bang”, but, when confronted with the question, “Where did the material come from for this so-called ‘Big Bang’”, they simply come up with multi-syllabic “scientific” jargon, and not-so-imaginative “multi-verse” fairy-tales, to avoid admitting that there is a God Who created them: in psychological terms, this is referred to as “intellectualizing” and “denial”. These impotent gods are so wrapped-up in their atheistic (“self-actualized”) arrogance, and “scientific” mumbo-jumbo, that they truly believe they have become omniscient (“all knowing”):

A hazard of being the most intelligent creature in the neighborhood is that IT FOSTERS AN ILLUSION OF OMNISCIENCE. Today we prostrate ourselves before the sciences, which tell us tales of origin and destiny, about which THEY KNOW NOTHING AND CAN GUESS LESS THAN THE MOST MINOR OF POETS. But we have no poets, and so accept the SOLEMN NARROW TWADDLE of the laboratories. Oh well. Perhaps the best that can be said of scientists is that the brightest of a large number of hamsters IS STILL A HAMSTER.” (emphasis added)

via Fred On Everything.

“Oh well. Perhaps the best that can be said of scientists is that THE BRIGHTEST OF A LARGE NUMBER OF HAMSTERS IS STILL A HAMSTER.” Humans look pretty intelligent, when compared with hamsters! So what! Perhaps these Darwin-worshipers should, as returning Roman conquerors, have slaves, following right behind them, day-in and day-out, who continually whisper in their ears, “All glory is fleeting! You are still mortal!”

For all out there who would deny the Creator and brag about man’s knowledge and technological advances, I would ask this: Where are your “scientific” gods now, Mr. and Ms. Postmodern/Atheist (so cool, so brilliant), when the entire Gulf of Mexico is being destroyed by the very oil that your own personal (materialistic) “scientific” gods, through their “advanced technology”, brought to the surface? So why, now, when they are needed so desperately, can’t your Darwinian heroes (materialistic, “scientific” gods) figure out how to put an end to this catastrophe and save the Gulf? What’s the matter, guys, is your love of Darwin and humanity (your perverse love of self), and denial of God, failing you at the moment? Come on, you “enlightened” supermen and superwomen, suck-up that oil, seal that leak, restore the vitality of the Gulf, heal those suffering animals and fishes, and restore the livelihoods of millions of people along the Gulf coast and beyond. You believe you’re omniscient, so put your money where your “politically-correct”, “tolerant” and God-hating mouths are, and rescue all of us from this out-of-control disaster!

What’s this I hear? Oh yes, I recognize this! It’s silence!

Goodbye, Gulf of Mexico! Goodbye, dolphins, fishes, crabs, shrimp, oysters, pelicans, marshes and estuaries! Goodbye, fishing industry and tourist trade! Goodbye, income of millions of working people along the coast and beyond! Hello, postmodern world of materialistic, Godless and worthless “science”! Welcome to what’s left of the world that, in their earth-bound, Spiritual ignorance, and obnoxious arrogance, the postmodern/atheists continue to destroy!

P.S.

Robert Jastrow (b. 1925 d. 2008) PhD Theoretical Physics recipient of NASA Medal for Exceptional Scientific Achievement

At present, SCIENCE HAS NO SATISFACTORY ANSWER to the question of the origin of life on the earth. Perhaps the appearance of life on the earth is a miracle. Scientists are reluctant to accept that view, but THEIR CHOICES ARE LIMITED; either life was created on the earth by the will of a being outside the grasp of scientific understanding, or it evolved on our planet spontaneously, through chemical reactions occurring in nonliving matter lying on the surface of the planet. The first theory places the question of the origin of life beyond the reach of scientific inquiry. It is a statement of faith in the power of a Supreme Being not subject to the laws of science. THE SECOND THEORY IS ALSO AN ACT OF FAITH. The act of faith consists in assuming that the scientific view of the origin of life is correct, WITHOUT HAVING CONCRETE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THAT BELIEF. Until the Sun Dies (1977) pp. 62-63

The details differ, but the essential elements in the astronomical and biblical accounts of Genesis are the same: the chain of events leading to man commenced suddenly and sharply at a definite moment in time, in a flash of light and energy … For the scientist WHO HAS LIVED BY HIS FAITH IN THE POWER OF REASON, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountain of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries. God and the Astronomers (1992) pp.106-107 (emphasis added)

Note: Robert Jastrow was a true man of science (a rarity in this day and age), and not some narcissistic and materialistic PhD who simply feels free to make-it-up as he (or she) goes.

It’s A Postmodern “Make-It-Up-As-We-Go” World: Two Blaring Examples

According to the (Atheist) "Experts in Education", this is an Absolute No No!

Here are a couple of well known and wise adages:

“If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!”

“Measure twice, cut once!”

These are pretty straightforward: if something is working well, then leave it alone, but if something is broken, then be very careful (“measure twice”) not to rush into making changes (“cut”) that, in the long term, might make things worse.

But here, unfortunately, is how postmodern atheists interpret these adages:

“If it ain’t broke, then there must be something really wrong with it! De-construct! De-construct!”

“Don’t bother to measure, that’s an old-fashioned waste of time, let’s just go ahead and cut and see what happens!”

And here is the postmodern atheist adage:

“Don’t worry if we screw everything up, or take something that worked well and ruin it, the government will still kowtow to our every whim!”

These “self-actualized” and “enlightened” folks must destroy anything that is working properly, and then remake it in such a way as to guarantee its never working properly again. They just can’t help themselves: it’s a postmodern-feminist-lesbian-homosexual-atheist thing, a “make-it-up-as-we-go” thing, that is just so backward and upside down that they truly have no choice but to make things worse. If it weren’t for the fact that these folks so continually mess almost everything up for the rest of us, they would almost be deserving of our concern and pity.

With this in mind, then, it seems that a few of these “self-actualized” and “enlightened” folks (“education experts”) have decided that elementary aged children shouldn’t have best friends:

…from Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn to Harry Potter and Ron Weasley, the childhood “best friend” has long been romanticized in literature and pop culture — not to mention in the sentimental memories of countless adults.

But increasingly, some educators and other professionals who work with children are asking a question that might surprise their parents: Should a child really have a best friend?

Most children naturally seek close friends. In a survey of nearly 3,000 Americans ages 8 to 24 conducted last year by Harris Interactive, 94 percent said they had at least one close friend. But the classic best-friend bond — the two special pals who share secrets and exploits, who gravitate to each other on the playground and who head out the door together every day after school — signals potential trouble for school officials intent on discouraging anything that hints of exclusivity, in part because of concerns about cliques and bullying.

“I think it is kids’ preference to pair up and have that one best friend. As adults — teachers and counselors — we try to encourage them not to do that,” said Christine Laycob, director of counseling at Mary Institute and St. Louis Country Day School in St. Louis. “We try to talk to kids and work with them to get them to have big groups of friends and not be so possessive about friends.”

“Parents sometimes say Johnny needs that one special friend,” she continued. “We say he doesn’t need a best friend.” (emphasis added)

via The End of the Best Friend – NYTimes.com.

Yes sir, let’s do away with best friends: I mean who needs best friends, in particular, children? These over-educated busy-bodies have decided that having a best friend is an act of “exclusion”. In other words, children who are sullen and self-contained, and will probably remain that way for the rest of their lives, are being, in the minds of these blind-guides, excluded by the children that need and can make friends: and, “Darwin knows”, the postmodern atheist can’t have one group of children doing better than the others around them, because that’s not equitable. This is how they approach competition of any kind, in particular, sports. To these “effete impudent snobs”, sports are fine as long as they’re not competitive: no keeping of scores or stats, no winners or losers. This is why we have a large number of children who can’t compete in life; and some of these children, over the past fifteen years, have carried automatic rifles to school and murdered their competitive and life-loving peers.

“Parents sometimes say Johnny needs that one special friend,” she continued. “WE SAY he doesn’t need a best friend.” This is a revealing statement! It seems that parents’ opinions mean little to these postmodern “experts”, as is the case in this next disgusting news item:

The Excuse!

First grade thru six graders can ask for condoms.

Provincetown, MA – Elementary school children, as young at six years old, could ask for condoms in one Massachusetts school district.

First thru six graders can receive the contraceptives if they ask in the Provincetown School District, which is right outside of Boston.

All 66 high schoolers and the 89 students in the lower grades can start asking for these latest school supplies in September.

There will be no papertrail and the school isn’t’ taking names AND WILL NOT REPORT BACK TO PARENTS. (emphasis added)

via First grade thru six graders can ask for condoms.

In a society where there is so much paranoia about pedophilia and “lost innocence”, it seems very strange, and even more hypocritical, that postmodern atheists (religionists) would be so keen on supplying sexual aids to extremely young children. I guess, in the dark recesses of the postmodern atheistic mind, it’s alright for elementary aged children to have sex, as long as it is with children of their own age. What’s the difference, then, in reality, between a pedophile seeking to introduce a child to sexual activities (“corruption of a minor”) and an “education expert” providing children with the means to have sex without the threat of pregnancy or disease? It seems to me that both have a rather perverse interest in the sexual behavior of young children, if there is such a thing as sexual behavior in young children. The difference between the two, of course, is the postmodern atheist (“education expert”) will get away with his or her perversion (under the guise of “science”), while the pedophile won’t (no PhD)!

Note, once again, that the parents are not to be contacted. The reason for this is obvious: most parents, with any sense of decency, would immediately withdraw their children from the school system where these so-called “experts” (perverts) have any control or influence.

Yes sir, it’s just another day in this postmodern-atheistic “make-it-up-as-we-go” world!

A New-Atheist Teaching in a Catholic School: For What Purpose?

This despicable poster, which so wrongly, and disgustingly, portrays our Lord and His sacrifice, sums up the arrogant, perverse nature and outrageous ignorance of the unregenerate mind (the “new”-atheist’s mind). Because of their total inability to sense the Spiritual realm that surrounds and confounds them, new-atheists are condemned to be the slaves of their own five senses and basic instincts: they are, in reality, little more than the animals they profess (without substantial evidence) to be their distant ancestors. This, perhaps, explains why new-atheists are such a tiny minority: 2.5% worldwide and 3-9% in the USA.

As anyone who reads this blog should know by now, I am not a fan of the Catholic church or its school system. But the following Pew Forum article forces me to side with the Catholics this time.

May 28, 2010

Iowa Catholic school fires teacher after Facebook survey indicates she doesn’t believe in God

by Clark Kauffman

The Des Moines Register

A Catholic teacher from Fort Dodge has been fired because of a Facebook survey in which she said she did not believe in God.

Abby Nurre, 27, was hired last summer as an eighth- grade math teacher at St. Edmond Catholic School. In August, she responded to a Facebook members’ poll in which she was asked whether she believed in God, miracles or heaven.

In response, Nurre answered, “No.” Her answers then became part of her Facebook autobiography page, which was accessible only to her designated “friends.”

In November, Nurre posted a comment to an online discussion forum, Atheist Nexus. In her post, she provided a link to a New York Times article that, as she described it, indicated the government had spent $2.3 million on prayer research in the past 10 years.

Five weeks later, she was called to the office of Monsignor Kevin McCoy and handed a letter informing her that she was suspended for making “atheist statements in a public forum.”

McCoy barred Nurre from school grounds. A few days later, without discussing the matter with Nurre, the school’s board of directors fired her for violating a policy that prohibits employees from advocating “principles contrary to the dogmatic and moral teaching of the church.” (emphasis added)

via Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.

In my opinion, this woman is merely attempting to create a story-line in which she ultimately becomes the “innocent victim of religious injustice”.

Why would any person, openly denying the existence of God, want to teach in a Catholic school system, where a religion about God is at the heart of the entire curriculum? Why wouldn’t a new-atheist, instead, want to teach in the public schools, where they already rule the entire system and more positions are available?

I can venture a pretty good guess, perhaps this woman wanted to teach at a religious school solely for political purposes: to indoctrinate her students in new-atheism and/or get fired for her ungodly beliefs and make a political stink? I believe it was for the latter reason that this new-atheist sought a teaching position in a religious school. In my estimation, and I could be wrong, this woman has simply gotten what she wanted: a chance to bring new-atheism to the forefront, and to show how she and her brothers and sisters are (in her opinion) being “discriminated against” in this society. This woman is most likely nothing more than a new-atheist “undercover-operative” seeking to stir up another “separation of church and state”/anti-religious frenzy.

{A new-atheist’s claim of there being no God is as much a statement of faith as the Christian’s belief of there being One. The new-atheists will rail on, vehemently, when faced with this more than obvious truth, but the fact remains that new-atheism is nothing more than another religion: a religion that believes and hopes in the non-existence of God and with a more than radical and fanatical faith. New-atheists have no substantial evidence to support their belief in no-god, whereas Christians have creation itself to explain and justify their belief and faith in God: the universe exists and so do we. The universe is more substantial as evidence for there being a Supernatural Creator than claiming, with the use of fairy-tales (unsubstantiated hypotheses), that the universe and human beings came about through mere chance and mutation (“The Big Bang”, “Natural Selection”): this “reasonable” and “enlightened” (faith-based) version of creation, in my estimation, verges on mental and emotional illness. As any honest scientist will verify, if any still exist, there has never been anything proven to be created out of nothing.}

The new-atheists, agnostics and pagans cry out for separation of church and state, and yet they don’t mind seeking to have the judicial system and government systematically, and covertly, remove the rights of those who believe in the Christ. The new-atheist will claim they despise all religious faiths, but, when it gets down to it, they almost always direct their attacks at the sons and daughters of the One True God.

{Warning, the following may be considered “intolerant”! The reason new-atheists attack Christianity more often than other religions is simple: the Truth of our Lord sticks in the crawl of their god, Satan, and, thus, Satan urges them to attack the sons and daughters of the Living God. Satan knows that all other religions are false, since he helped, with the aid of fallen human beings, to bring them into existence. The new-atheist, needless to say, is totally oblivious to this reality!}

The majority of people can REASON well enough to sense there is a realm beyond the physical or material, a realm where the supernatural exists and rules (evil and good). The REASON man has believed in a supernatural being and Spiritual realm, from the beginning, is due to the fact that the existence of God is evident in the creation. But evidently a small percentage of human beings are so learning disabled, so blind and deaf, they cannot truly sense what surrounds them:

For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. 20For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are WITHOUT EXCUSE. (Romans 1)

…in whose case the god of this world has BLINDED THE MINDS of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. (2 Corinthians 4: 4)

I may be wrong about this woman’s motives, but if I am, she must be either extremely naive, confused or not too bright. Why would any new-atheist, in their right mind (if that’s a possibility), believe they could teach in a religious school system without, sooner or later, being exposed, confronted and held accountable? Perhaps this woman is at a Spiritual crossroad in her life and uncertain of what she believes? If this is the case, then let me say that I am truly sorry for jumping to a false conclusion! You know, a “false conclusion” like, “I can’t see, hear, smell or touch Him, so, therefore, there is no God.”

The fact is, this woman agreed to the terms of a contract to teach in a Catholic school, and, therefore, she is bound by that contract. She must have known that she would be held accountable for her actions outside of the classroom, just as any other contracted teacher, whether in a public, private or parochial school, knows their actions outside of the classroom can adversely affect their career longevity. This is why I believe this woman knew exactly what she was doing.