I happened across one of the pop “science” channels and there sat this evolutionary psychologist proclaiming, in an obnoxiously atheistic and authoritative tone, that “the human animal” was never intended to be monogamous. According to this Darwinian “intellect”, an “evolving human animal seeks to be joined” (to mate) and yet the “human animal” is “an adulterer at heart”. Why are human beings “adulterers at heart”? According to this over-educated purveyor of postmodern (unsubstantiated) propaganda, human beings are nothing more than advanced primates who have little or no control of themselves or their actions. Human beings (“the human animal”), according to this Spiritually dead hack and quack, have no basis for civilized behavior, beyond, of course, that which “natural-selection” has, through mutation and chance (evolution), alloted them.
{In a little over one hundred and fifty years, these Darwinian lab-coated and pocket-protecting atheists have taken the sanctity and beauty of human life, a life created by God, and transformed it into a seething cesspool existence (“Darwin’s primordial soup”) where everything is “relative” and there is no absolute truth.}
This kind of atheistic/”scientific” propaganda has a desensitizing effect: if totally held as a belief, this “theory” will dehumanize other human beings in the minds and hearts of those believing the lie. When a person with no real substantiated evidence becomes convinced that he or she is little more than a mutated-by-chance chimpanzee, then along with their own life other people’s lives become devalued in their hearts and minds. This devaluing of human life, then, can open the door to all kinds of evil in the name of “science” and “humanity”: a “science” under the guise of “progress” (myths) that in the end harms more than benefits humanity.
Introduction
Voices haunt the pages of every book. This particular book, however, speaks for the never-born, for those whose questions have never been heard for those who never existed.
Throughout the first six decades of the twentieth century, hundreds of thousands of Americans and untold numbers of others were not permitted to continue their families by reproducing. Selected because of their ancestry, national origin, race or religion, they were forcibly sterilized, wrongly committed to mental institutions where they died in great numbers, prohibited from marrying, and sometimes even unmarried by state bureaucrats. In America, this battle to wipe out whole ethnic groups was fought not by armies with guns nor by hate sects at the margins. Rather, this pernicious white-gloved war was prosecuted by esteemed professors, elite universities, wealthy industrialists and government officials colluding in a racist, pseudoscientific movement called EUGENICS. The purpose: create a superior Nordic race.
To perpetuate the campaign, widespread academic fraud combined with almost unlimited corporate philanthropy to establish the biological rationales for persecution. Employing a hazy amalgam of guesswork, gossip, falsified information and polysyllabic academic arrogance, the eugenics movement slowly constructed a national bureaucratic and juridical infrastructure to cleanse America of its unfit. Specious intelligence tests, colloquially known as IQ tests, were invented to justify incarceration of a group labeled feebleminded. Often the so-called feebleminded were just shy, too good-natured to be taken seriously, or simply spoke the wrong language or were the wrong color. Mandatory sterilization laws were enacted in some twenty-seven states to prevent targeted individuals from reproducing more of their kind. Marriage prohibition laws proliferated throughout the country to stop race mixing. Collusive litigation was taken to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sanctified eugenics and its tactics.
The goal was to immediately sterilize fourteen million people in the United States and millions more worldwide the lower tenth and then continuously eradicate the remaining lowest tenth until only a pure Nordic super race remained. Ultimately, some 60,000 Americans were coercively sterilized and the total is probably much higher. No one knows how many marriages were thwarted by state felony statutes. Although much of the persecution was simply racism, ethnic hatred and academic elitism, EUGENICS wore the mantle of respectable science to mask its true character. (emphasis added)
Eugenics, a pseudo-scientific/ideological aberration of Darwin’s half-cousin, Francis Galton, was the bastard child of Darwin’s racist tendencies and unsubstantiated hypothesis (“natural selection”). Eugenics is the “common ancestor”, the “founding father”, of today’s modern genetics (stem cell “research”, and a popular form of “selective breeding”, “designer babies”): a morally questionable at best “science” that thrives in this hedonistic country, as well as the rest of the world. Through this manipulative renaming, eugenics has merely been dressed up in a more “politically-correct”, “tolerant” and less objectionable garb (genetics); a garb that seeks to cover up the ungodly elitist hatred and bigotry, the dirty underwear, that is at the heart and soul of eugenics.
One can sprinkle flowers and perfume on cow manure in order to make it look and smell better, but if he or she gets real close and digs real deep he or she will find that it still looks and smells like bovine excrement. In the same sense, a pile of unsubstantiated hypothetical excrement by any other name still smells like “bad science”!
This kind of desensitizing and life-devaluing propaganda (evolution/eugenics/genetics) has been perpetrated on every child attending American public schools for the last three-quarters of a century or more. Is it any wonder, with this in mind then, that American public school students, over the past twenty years, have made the evening news for mass murdering felllow students and teachers in their high schools. Is it any wonder, then, that prior to the nineteenth century (before Darwin) there were no records of “serial killers” to be found anywhere in the world? Is it any wonder, then, that in America alone Darwinian-indoctrinated doctors, over the past thirty-plus-years, have “legally” (Roe v. Wade) murdered hundreds of millions of unborn babies (“abortion”)?
{Unborn children, alive in their mother’s wombs, torn apart by chemicals and surgical instruments (“aborted”), and for the sole purpose of granting an immature and promiscuous woman’s “right of choice”. A “woman’s right of choice” to escape the ultimate penalty for responding to her sexual desire like a female animal “in heat”: an “unwanted pregnancy”, a truly inconvenient truth. Why wouldn’t a “liberated” woman respond this way? After all, the feminist/lesbian/atheists, like the psychologist above, have pounded into women’s minds, during the last forty-plus years, that their bodies belong to them, and therefore, they have the “right” to do with them as they see fit, no matter how heinous the outcome. “Liberated” women have become desensitized and dehumanized to the point that their unborn children have become nothing more to them than unwanted inanimate objects: unwanted inanimate objects euphemistically referred to as “embryos” and “fetuses”. The maternal qualities that God built into women are all but gone now, and like men, women, today, are truly less than the human beings their Creator created them to be.}
Is it any wonder, then, that Hitler, seven decades ago, was able to find a “scientific rationalization” through evolution and eugenics for the mass murder of millions of people (literally) branded as “inferior races”? Is it any wonder, then, that other nations in Europe since Hitler have followed his example by seeking to “ethnically cleanse”, through mass murder, their countries of the inconvenience of “the unfit for life”?
…one of Hitler’s favorite sayings was, “POLITICS IS APPLIED BIOLOGY“. Hitler’s ideas of racial purity led to unprecedented atrocities in Europe. Since then, ethnic cleansing has occurred in Cambodia, the Balkans, Sudan, and Rwanda. In one sense, ethnic cleansing is another name for the tribal warfare and mass murder that has afflicted human society for ages, but these crimes seem to gain intensity when believed to be SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED. (emphasis added)
via Social interpretations of race – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
“POLITICS IS APPLIED BIOLOGY.” In other words, since the “human animal” has evolved and is, therefore, nothing more than a mutated-by-chance ancestor of a chimp, then it is, in a political sense, expendable: “Since there is no sacredness or eternal value to life, the disposal of certain breeds of ‘the human animal’ (ethnicities, races) can be politically and socially expedient!” Note also that, according to this author, these kinds of “crimes intensify when believed to be SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED”. Has there ever been a more SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED (and unsubstantiated) hypothesis as “natural selection”?
When we become desensitized to the sanctity of life, then we open the door for the devaluing of our own lives and those around us; we begin the long disastrous journey toward the dehumanization of ourselves and everyone else. This perverse kind of postmodern/atheistic coercion can be rather subtle at first: the introduction of “scientific” theories, as unsubstantiated as they may be, and the use of terms and phrases (euphemisms) such as “common ancestor,” “natural selection,” “survival of the fittest,” “the human animal,” “embryos,” “zygotes,” “fetuses,” the “feeble-minded,” and the “UNFIT FOR LIFE,” can lull us into a Godless stupor where life of any kind is no longer reverenced.
Bald-faced liars didn’t start out that way: they started out with little fibs that got more and more involved, which then lead to more elaborate lies until one day they couldn’t tell the difference between the lies and reality. The loss of integrity can happen in much the same manner: a person starts with one little lie to the boss, or the pilfering of money from the safe, but after a while the lies become bolder and the theft increases until that initial small crack in integrity has turned into a Grand Canyon of lies and thievery. A “scientific theory” can begin with a flawed hypothesis and, unless corrected or thrown out, can then grow into a bald-faced lie put forth as truth; and in the end, this unsubstantiated “theory” (bald-faced lie) can end up doing more harm than it ever did good; such is the case with evolution and eugenics/genetics, whether we are willing to face the facts or not!
If we’re not careful, then, we can become like frogs in a frying pan: a frog placed in a frying pan filled with water and set at a low temperature, which is then slowly increased, will sit there totally unaware and seemingly unaffected until he is completely cooked through. In a similar manner, most people will sit quietly by while listening to and believing every unsubstantiated “scientific theory” put forth by lab-coated “geniuses” until these so-called “theories” have totally obliterated their ability to reason.
Hitler didn’t start out in the early 1930′s by suggesting the mass-murder of millions of Jews, gypsies and homosexuals. No, he started out with subtle and subliminal language (“theories” and ideologies) that would slowly but surely indoctrinate and blind the German people to the truth of what he was about to do.
In conclusion, do we really know and understand what lies at the heart and agenda of eugenics/genetic research today? Do we really know and understand why an unsubstantiated hypothesis (“natural selection”), by an emotionally and religiously confused man (Darwin), is being thrust on our children: in the public schools, by the government, and on every television channel and news program? If the “theory of evolution” is as airtight as the Darwinian lab-coats claim, then why are they so fearful of an alternative to their religious dogma: why are they so against the teaching of “intelligent design” and creationism in the public schools? Why do these Darwinian lab-coats fight so vehemently against a simple parenthetical clause in science textbooks that states, “Evolution is merely a hypothesis that many scientists disagree with.” If they’re so sure of themselves and what they believe to be true, then why are they so afraid?
{A liar doesn’t want others delving deep into his lies, nor does he want the truth exposing his lies!}
Are these politically powerful, Darwinian lab-coats so afraid of their weak hypothesis that they don’t want it scrutinized in any way? I thought good scientific practice amounted to treating any hypothesis as being false until all information contained in the hypothesis could be thoroughly substantiated through scientific scrutiny? I guess this kind of science (science seeking the truth) has either become rare or non-existent in the world today?
Those of us with children, who also have faith in the Lord, should keep them from being indoctrinated in this bald-faced and bad-science fabrication: science and knowledge are not evil, but educational indoctrination and bad science are! From the beginning of life, the education of children is not the responsibility of the ungodly state, it’s the responsibility of the parents! Education is a responsibility that, since the inception of public education, has been shirked by almost all parents, except, of course, those who have chosen to embrace their parental responsibilities by homeschooling their children.
Do we want our children to grow up believing that their ancestors were puke-eating chimpanzees? Do we want our children to value the sanctity and preciousness of created life, whether it be a kitten, robin or another child? Then we best be speaking to our children, while we still have the authority and opportunity, about the lies being perpetrated by the atheistic powers that rule this world system!
The new-atheists, agnostics and pagans cry out for separation of church and state, and yet they don’t mind seeking to have the judicial system and government systematically, and covertly, remove the rights of those who believe in the Christ. The new-atheist will claim they despise all religious faiths, but, when it gets down to it, they almost always direct their attacks at the sons and daughters of the One True God.
As I’ve listened to the ramblings of unregenerate postmodern/Darwinian/materialists, over the past few years, I have noted that their “scientific” rhetoric always seems to be in a state of perpetual change (chaos). And yet they continue to paint their pseudo-religious (atheistic) dogma, masquerading as science, as the absolute truth: “evolution is a fact”, but always changing, “global warming” has changed to “global climate change”, and then back to “global warming” again. These lovers of the environment (and self) attempt to manipulate the rest of us, through the media, the government, and our public schools and universities, into becoming “green” advocates who are always aware of our so-called “carbon footprints”. They forecast, almost constantly, short and long-term dire predictions for the environment, which can only be avoided, of course, by jumping on board their materialistic bandwagon and fighting “the system”: “the (very same) system” they operate. Ten years ago, one of their major gurus (
The fact of this whole environmental matter is this (according to the Word of God): fallen man IS destroying his environment and HAS BEEN for the last six thousand years, and in much the same way as he has been destroying himself and those around him: through greed and the desire for power to control others; a desire based solely on self-survival at all cost. The destruction (the passing away) of the earth began on the day man was driven from the garden and his intimate relationship with the Creator; and it has continued to accelerate since that fateful day:
For example: “Seventy-two per cent of Americans believe it is important that their president have “strong religious beliefs” What?! Then why did the 72% allow Obama to be elected, since Barack is all over the place when it comes to what he believes, Spiritually: the president is a mere child, when it comes to the matters of the Lord and His Spirit, as are most of the 72%! And then there is this quote: “Participating in the National Prayer Breakfast is AN EASY WAY to demonstrate those beliefs.” So, then, all Barack has to do is eat breakfast at a “prayer” get-together, and he’s cool with the constituency? What a sad, and apostate, “religious” joke! 
Recent Comments