The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)! (Follow-Up #2)

Planned Parenthood's Heritage

This is a follow-up post to The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)! and The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)! (Follow-Up)

The following quote is from a book entitled, War Against the Weak, by Edwin Black:

In the first three decades of the 20th Century, American corporate philanthropy combined with prestigious academic fraud to create the pseudoscience eugenics that institutionalized race politics as national policy. The goal: create a superior, white, Nordic race and obliterate the viability of everyone else. How? By identifying so-called “defective” family trees and subjecting them to legislated segregation and sterilization programs. The victims: poor people, brown-haired white people, African Americans, immigrants, Indians, Eastern European Jews, the infirm and really anyone classified outside the superior genetic lines drawn up by American raceologists. The main culprits were the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune, in league with America’s most respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as Harvard, Yale and Princeton, operating out of a complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island. The eugenic network worked in tandem with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the State Department and numerous state governmental bodies and legislatures throughout the country, and even the U.S. Supreme Court. They were all bent on breeding a eugenically superior race, just as agronomists would breed better strains of corn. The plan was to wipe away the reproductive capability of the weak and inferior. Ultimately, 60,000 Americans were coercively sterilized — legally and extra-legally. Many never discovered the truth until decades later. Those who actively supported eugenics include America’s most progressive figures: Woodrow Wilson, MARGARET SANGER, and Oliver Wendell Holmes who ruled on the infamous Carrie Buck trial and declared “three generations of imbeciles is enough.”

[MARGARET SANGER: one of the founders of Planned Parenthood]

American eugenic crusades proliferated into a worldwide campaign, and in the 1920s came to the attention of Adolf Hitler. Under the Nazis, American eugenic principles were applied without restraint, careening out of control into the Reich’s infamous genocide. During the pre-War years, American eugenicists OPENLY SUPPORTED Germany’s program. The Rockefeller Foundation financed the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute and the work of its central racial scientists. Once WWII began, Nazi eugenics turned from mass sterilization and euthanasia to genocidal murder. One of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute doctors in the program financed by the Rockefeller Foundation was Josef Mengele who continued his research in Auschwitz, making daily eugenic reports on twins. After the world recoiled from Nazi atrocities, the American eugenics movement — its institutions and leading scientists — renamed and regrouped under the banner of an enlightened science called HUMAN GENETICS. (emphasis mine)

via War Against The Weak – Home Page.

The Nordic/Aryan Ideal: "The Fit for Life"

If you think eugenics is dead and gone, then think again! Remember, over the past few years, hearing about “designer babies” on the news? “Designer babies:” where parents can select the human traits they want in their child before conception? This is just another example of an ungodly, perverse product of eugenics (genetic research). Here is a recent news article that reveals the long-term, deleterious effects of eugenics, physically, mentally, and emotionally, on the human beings who have been ravaged by it:

North Carolina hearing explores history of forced sterilization – CNN.com

(CNN) — Deborah Chesson spoke through tears Wednesday as she addressed a North Carolina task force on behalf of her mother.

“I’m writing you with hopes that you will understand the pain, hurt and emptiness I still feel inside,” she read.

“A social worker convinced my mom to sign for me to undergo an operation that would prevent me from getting pregnant, not knowing all the while that I was being set up to be sterilized like I was some kind of animal.”

Dozens of North Carolina citizens spoke at the public hearing against the state’s five-decade forced sterilization program. The listening session, held by the governor’s task force, gave victims the opportunity to share their experiences with a state task force charged with recommending compensation for victims and their families.

Eugenics is the process of selectively breeding humans and animals to rid the population of “unfit” characteristics. In 1933, North Carolina passed a revised eugenics law. The law established the North Carolina Eugenics Board, which largely targeted low-income females for sterilization procedures. (emphasis mine)

via North Carolina hearing explores history of forced sterilization – CNN.com.

And here is yet another example of this Darwinian/atheistic plague, but this time it’s Al Gore and his buddies at the United Nations planning an Aryan/Nordic Utopia:

This population control agenda is also reflected in official UN documents.

The following is language from a UN resolution that was adopted by the UN General Assembly that was designed to further the implementation of Agenda 21….

“….population growth rates have been declining globally, largely as a result of expanded basic education and health care. That trend is projected to lead to a stable world population in the middle of the twenty-first century… The current decline in population growth rates must be further promoted through national and international policies that promote economic development, social development, environmental protection, and poverty eradication, particularly the further expansion of basic education, with full and equal access for girls and women, and health care, including reproductive health care, including both family planning and sexual health, consistent with the report of the International Conference on Population and Development.”

Most Americans don’t grasp it yet, but the truth is that the global elite are absolutely obsessed with population control. In fact, there is a growing consensus among the global elite that they need to get rid of 80 to 90 percent of us. (emphasis mine)

via Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control.

We must face the fact that eugenics is still alive and well. The Nordic/Aryan ideology that gave license to the forced sterilization, torture (“medical experimentation”), and murder, of 18 million people in Europe, during W.W.II, is still thriving in the world today. We could, if we tried real hard, delude ourselves into believing excrement smells like a rose, but sooner or later, when we leaned down to smell it, we would know it is nothing more than excrement. In much the same way, then, we can delude ourselves into believing Planned Parenthood (abortion central) and genetic research have nothing to do with ungodly and perverse eugenics, but, when we get close enough to really look at and smell Planned Parenthood and genetic research, we should be capable of discerning that it is nothing more than ungodly and perverse eugenics in disguise!

God is not mocked. There is a day of reckoning coming, where all will be held accountable for what they have done in this life, good and bad:

Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap. (Galatians 6: 7)

For more on the subject of eugenics and Planned Parenthood, you can read here:

tolbert_plannedparenthood_targets.pdf (application/pdf Object).

The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)!

I happened across one of the pop “science” channels and there sat this evolutionary psychologist proclaiming, in an obnoxiously atheistic and authoritative tone, that “the human animal” was never intended to be monogamous. According to this Darwinian “intellect”, an “evolving human animal seeks to be joined” (to mate) and yet the “human animal” is “an adulterer at heart”. Why are human beings “adulterers at heart”? According to this over-educated purveyor of postmodern (unsubstantiated) propaganda, human beings are nothing more than advanced primates who have little or no control of themselves or their actions. Human beings (“the human animal”), according to this Spiritually dead hack and quack, have no basis for civilized behavior, beyond, of course, that which “natural-selection” has, through mutation and chance (evolution), alloted them.

{In a little over one hundred and fifty years, these Darwinian lab-coated and pocket-protecting atheists have taken the sanctity and beauty of human life, a life created by God, and transformed it into a seething cesspool existence (“Darwin’s primordial soup”) where everything is “relative” and there is no absolute truth.}

This kind of atheistic/”scientific” propaganda has a desensitizing effect: if totally held as a belief, this “theory” will dehumanize other human beings in the minds and hearts of those believing the lie. When a person with no real substantiated evidence becomes convinced that he or she is little more than a mutated-by-chance chimpanzee, then along with their own life other people’s lives become devalued in their hearts and minds. This devaluing of human life, then, can open the door to all kinds of evil in the name of “science” and “humanity”: a “science” under the guise of “progress” (myths) that in the end harms more than benefits humanity.

Introduction

Voices haunt the pages of every book. This particular book, however, speaks for the never-born, for those whose questions have never been heard for those who never existed.

Throughout the first six decades of the twentieth century, hundreds of thousands of Americans and untold numbers of others were not permitted to continue their families by reproducing. Selected because of their ancestry, national origin, race or religion, they were forcibly sterilized, wrongly committed to mental institutions where they died in great numbers, prohibited from marrying, and sometimes even unmarried by state bureaucrats. In America, this battle to wipe out whole ethnic groups was fought not by armies with guns nor by hate sects at the margins. Rather, this pernicious white-gloved war was prosecuted by esteemed professors, elite universities, wealthy industrialists and government officials colluding in a racist, pseudoscientific movement called EUGENICS. The purpose: create a superior Nordic race.

To perpetuate the campaign, widespread academic fraud combined with almost unlimited corporate philanthropy to establish the biological rationales for persecution. Employing a hazy amalgam of guesswork, gossip, falsified information and polysyllabic academic arrogance, the eugenics movement slowly constructed a national bureaucratic and juridical infrastructure to cleanse America of its unfit. Specious intelligence tests, colloquially known as IQ tests, were invented to justify incarceration of a group labeled feebleminded. Often the so-called feebleminded were just shy, too good-natured to be taken seriously, or simply spoke the wrong language or were the wrong color. Mandatory sterilization laws were enacted in some twenty-seven states to prevent targeted individuals from reproducing more of their kind. Marriage prohibition laws proliferated throughout the country to stop race mixing. Collusive litigation was taken to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sanctified eugenics and its tactics.

The goal was to immediately sterilize fourteen million people in the United States and millions more worldwide the lower tenth and then continuously eradicate the remaining lowest tenth until only a pure Nordic super race remained. Ultimately, some 60,000 Americans were coercively sterilized and the total is probably much higher. No one knows how many marriages were thwarted by state felony statutes. Although much of the persecution was simply racism, ethnic hatred and academic elitism, EUGENICS wore the mantle of respectable science to mask its true character. (emphasis added)

via War Against the Weak – Introduction.

Eugenics, a pseudo-scientific/ideological aberration of Darwin’s half-cousin, Francis Galton, was the bastard child of Darwin’s racist tendencies and unsubstantiated hypothesis (“natural selection”). Eugenics is the “common ancestor”, the “founding father”, of today’s modern genetics (stem cell “research”, and a popular form of “selective breeding”, “designer babies”): a morally questionable at best “science” that thrives in this hedonistic country, as well as the rest of the world. Through this manipulative renaming, eugenics has merely been dressed up in a more “politically-correct”, “tolerant” and less objectionable garb (genetics); a garb that seeks to cover up the ungodly elitist hatred and bigotry, the dirty underwear, that is at the heart and soul of eugenics.

One can sprinkle flowers and perfume on cow manure in order to make it look and smell better, but if he or she gets real close and digs real deep he or she will find that it still looks and smells like bovine excrement. In the same sense, a pile of unsubstantiated hypothetical excrement by any other name still smells like “bad science”!

This kind of desensitizing and life-devaluing propaganda (evolution/eugenics/genetics) has been perpetrated on every child attending American public schools for the last three-quarters of a century or more. Is it any wonder, with this in mind then, that American public school students, over the past twenty years, have made the evening news for mass murdering felllow students and teachers in their high schools. Is it any wonder, then, that prior to the nineteenth century (before Darwin) there were no records of “serial killers” to be found anywhere in the world? Is it any wonder, then, that in America alone Darwinian-indoctrinated doctors, over the past thirty-plus-years, have “legally” (Roe v. Wade) murdered hundreds of millions of unborn babies (“abortion”)?

{Unborn children, alive in their mother’s wombs, torn apart by chemicals and surgical instruments (“aborted”), and for the sole purpose of granting an immature and promiscuous woman’s “right of choice”. A “woman’s right of choice” to escape the ultimate penalty for responding to her sexual desire like a female animal “in heat”: an “unwanted pregnancy”, a truly inconvenient truth. Why wouldn’t a “liberated” woman respond this way? After all, the feminist/lesbian/atheists, like the psychologist above, have pounded into women’s minds, during the last forty-plus years, that their bodies belong to them, and therefore, they have the “right” to do with them as they see fit, no matter how heinous the outcome. “Liberated” women have become desensitized and dehumanized to the point that their unborn children have become nothing more to them than unwanted inanimate objects: unwanted inanimate objects euphemistically referred to as “embryos” and “fetuses”. The maternal qualities that God built into women are all but gone now, and like men, women, today, are truly less than the human beings their Creator created them to be.}

Is it any wonder, then, that Hitler, seven decades ago, was able to find a “scientific rationalization” through evolution and eugenics for the mass murder of millions of people (literally) branded as “inferior races”? Is it any wonder, then, that other nations in Europe since Hitler have followed his example by seeking to “ethnically cleanse”, through mass murder, their countries of the inconvenience of “the unfit for life”?

…one of Hitler’s favorite sayings was, “POLITICS IS APPLIED BIOLOGY“. Hitler’s ideas of racial purity led to unprecedented atrocities in Europe. Since then, ethnic cleansing has occurred in Cambodia, the Balkans, Sudan, and Rwanda. In one sense, ethnic cleansing is another name for the tribal warfare and mass murder that has afflicted human society for ages, but these crimes seem to gain intensity when believed to be SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED. (emphasis added)

via Social interpretations of race – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

“POLITICS IS APPLIED BIOLOGY.” In other words, since the “human animal” has evolved and is, therefore, nothing more than a mutated-by-chance ancestor of a chimp, then it is, in a political sense, expendable: “Since there is no sacredness or eternal value to life, the disposal of certain breeds of ‘the human animal’ (ethnicities, races) can be politically and socially expedient!” Note also that, according to this author, these kinds of “crimes intensify when believed to be SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED”. Has there ever been a more SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED (and unsubstantiated) hypothesis as “natural selection”?

When we become desensitized to the sanctity of life, then we open the door for the devaluing of our own lives and those around us; we begin the long disastrous journey toward the dehumanization of ourselves and everyone else. This perverse kind of postmodern/atheistic coercion can be rather subtle at first: the introduction of “scientific” theories, as unsubstantiated as they may be, and the use of terms and phrases (euphemisms) such as “common ancestor,” “natural selection,” “survival of the fittest,” “the human animal,” “embryos,” “zygotes,” “fetuses,” the “feeble-minded,” and the “UNFIT FOR LIFE,” can lull us into a Godless stupor where life of any kind is no longer reverenced.

Bald-faced liars didn’t start out that way: they started out with little fibs that got more and more involved, which then lead to more elaborate lies until one day they couldn’t tell the difference between the lies and reality. The loss of integrity can happen in much the same manner: a person starts with one little lie to the boss, or the pilfering of money from the safe, but after a while the lies become bolder and the theft increases until that initial small crack in integrity has turned into a Grand Canyon of lies and thievery. A “scientific theory” can begin with a flawed hypothesis and, unless corrected or thrown out, can then grow into a bald-faced lie put forth as truth; and in the end, this unsubstantiated “theory” (bald-faced lie) can end up doing more harm than it ever did good; such is the case with evolution and eugenics/genetics, whether we are willing to face the facts or not!

If we’re not careful, then, we can become like frogs in a frying pan: a frog placed in a frying pan filled with water and set at a low temperature, which is then slowly increased, will sit there totally unaware and seemingly unaffected until he is completely cooked through. In a similar manner, most people will sit quietly by while listening to and believing every unsubstantiated “scientific theory” put forth by lab-coated “geniuses” until these so-called “theories” have totally obliterated their ability to reason.

Hitler didn’t start out in the early 1930′s by suggesting the mass-murder of millions of Jews, gypsies and homosexuals. No, he started out with subtle and subliminal language (“theories” and ideologies) that would slowly but surely indoctrinate and blind the German people to the truth of what he was about to do.

In conclusion, do we really know and understand what lies at the heart and agenda of eugenics/genetic research today? Do we really know and understand why an unsubstantiated hypothesis (“natural selection”), by an emotionally and religiously confused man (Darwin), is being thrust on our children: in the public schools, by the government, and on every television channel and news program? If the “theory of evolution” is as airtight as the Darwinian lab-coats claim, then why are they so fearful of an alternative to their religious dogma: why are they so against the teaching of “intelligent design” and creationism in the public schools? Why do these Darwinian lab-coats fight so vehemently against a simple parenthetical clause in science textbooks that states, “Evolution is merely a hypothesis that many scientists disagree with.” If they’re so sure of themselves and what they believe to be true, then why are they so afraid?

{A liar doesn’t want others delving deep into his lies, nor does he want the truth exposing his lies!}

Are these politically powerful, Darwinian lab-coats so afraid of their weak hypothesis that they don’t want it scrutinized in any way? I thought good scientific practice amounted to treating any hypothesis as being false until all information contained in the hypothesis could be thoroughly substantiated through scientific scrutiny? I guess this kind of science (science seeking the truth) has either become rare or non-existent in the world today?

Those of us with children, who also have faith in the Lord, should keep them from being indoctrinated in this bald-faced and bad-science fabrication: science and knowledge are not evil, but educational indoctrination and bad science are! From the beginning of life, the education of children is not the responsibility of the ungodly state, it’s the responsibility of the parents! Education is a responsibility that, since the inception of public education, has been shirked by almost all parents, except, of course, those who have chosen to embrace their parental responsibilities by homeschooling their children.

Do we want our children to grow up believing that their ancestors were puke-eating chimpanzees? Do we want our children to value the sanctity and preciousness of created life, whether it be a kitten, robin or another child? Then we best be speaking to our children, while we still have the authority and opportunity, about the lies being perpetrated by the atheistic powers that rule this world system!

From a Lie to the Truth! (Follow-up)

Ever notice how Darwinian/naturalist-atheists claim there is no “scientific proof” for the existence of an intelligent designer (God)? And yet, when blatantly shown there is no substantiated “scientific proof” for the existence of (macro) evolution either, they simply make up fairy tale scenarios with multi-syllabic terms to convince (proselytize) the great multitude of doubters (78% of Americans, according to a recent MSNBC poll) that their god (“natural selection”) does truly exist. There seems to be a bit of inconsistency on the part of Darwinian/naturalist-atheists, but, then again, why would we expect anything different from a group of people who deny the very real Spiritual universe that surrounds them?

Here, then, are two more articles that speak of the deluded state of Darwinian/naturalist-atheists (materialists).

When Nothing Created Everything

JOE CARTER

I’ve decided to take the elements of materialism and shape them into a purportedly accurate, though mythic, narrative. This is what our culture has been missing for far too long – a creation story for young atheistic materialists.

Throughout history people have been awed and thrilled by retellings of their culture’s creation story.

Aztecs would tell of the Lady of the Skirt of Snakes, Phoenicians about the Zophashamin, and Jews and Christians about the one true God – Jehovah. But there is one unfortunate group – the children of atheistic materialists – that has no creation myth to call its own. When an inquisitive tyke asks who created the sun, the animals, and mankind, their materialist parents can only tell them to read a book by Carl Sagan or Richard Dawkins.

But what sort of story are they likely to find? Should they be told, as famed astrophysicist Stephen Hawking claims in his recent book The Grand Design that “the universe… create[d] itself from nothing”?

Since Hawking’s explanation is a bit too drab and nospecific for bedtime reading I’ve decided to take the elements of materialism and shape them into a purportedly accurate, though mythic, narrative. This is what our culture has been missing for far too long – a creation story for young atheistic materialists.

In the beginning was Nothing, and Nothing created Everything. When Nothing decided to create Everything, she filled a tiny dot with Time, Chance, and Everything and had it expand. The expansion spread Everything into Everywhere carrying Time and Chance with it to keep it company. The three stretched out together leaving bits of themselves wherever they went. One of those places was the planet Earth…

And that is why, children, when Man loses his Life he goes from being a Something created by Time and Chance into becoming like his creator – Nothing.

You can find the rest of this article here:

via When Nothing Created Everything.

Unreasonable Doubt

The reasons for unbelief are more complex than many atheists let on.

Jim Spiegel | posted 2/10/2011 09:28AM

Related articles and links | [no previous page] 1 of 3 [next page]

ADVERTISEMENT

Have A New Kid By Friday

The recent publication of Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow’s The Grand Design has reignited debate over God’s existence. The ironically titled book proposes that the cosmos was spontaneously generated “from nothing,” with no God (or gods) required to make sense of existence. Never mind the question-begging: How can nothing produce something, let alone hundreds of billions of galaxies? Many atheists celebrate this bestseller as further grounds for dismissing religious belief.

Most atheists would have us think they arrived at their view through cool, rational inquiry. But are other factors involved? Consider the candid remarks of contemporary philosopher Thomas Nagel: “I want atheism to be true …. It isn’t just that I don’t believe in God, and, naturally, hope that I’m right about my belief. It’s that I hope there is no God! I don’t want there to be a God; I don’t want the universe to be like that.” Could Nagel’s attitude—albeit in a more subtle form—actually be common among atheists?

via Unreasonable Doubt | Christianity Today | A Magazine of Evangelical Conviction.

From a Lie to the Truth!

Below is a post from the site Uncommon Descent. I found this post interesting, so I thought I would share it with all of you.

The top three books that helped change me from a mindless, irrational Darwinist into an ID proponent

#1 Evolution, A Theory in Crisis

I was arguing with a (yes, Christian) friend named Dave, about “evolution,” and told him that science had proven that in the primordial seas, once upon a time, a self-replicating molecule came about, and then random changes filtered through natural selection eventually produced all of life. This is what I was taught all my life, having grown up in an academic community infested with “scientists” who told me that any other interpretation of origins was evidence of mindless religious fanaticism.

Dave said, “Don’t trust me, read Michael Denton’s book.” I read it in two days, and exclaimed to myself: “Unholy Crap, I’ve been conned!” (By the way, as best I can figure, Denton is an atheist or at least an agnostic, and has no theological axe to grind.) Interestingly enough, it was this book that first inspired Michael Behe to have doubts about Darwinian orthodoxy.

#2 Darwin On Trial

In this work, Phillip Johnson, an attorney with an extraordinarily sharp mind, elucidates the deceptive and manipulative techniques employed by Darwinists to obfuscate, distort, and use selective evidence to defend the indefensible.

#3 Darwin’s Black Box

In this book Michael Behe lays the foundation for the discovery (which should have been evident all along, ever since the realization that the DNA molecule is an information-encoding system) that life at the most fundamental level is the product of engineered technology. I’ve read the rebuttals to Behe by the most prominent Darwinists, and they are universally desperate attempts that don’t even address his challenges, but change the subject to protein-sequence similarities and other irrelevancies.

via The top three books that helped change me from a mindless, irrational Darwinist into an ID proponent | Uncommon Descent.

Merry Christmas, Whiners, Manipulators, Malcontents: Darwinian/Naturalist/Atheists!

These Christmas trees make me feel "excluded"! WAAAAAA!!!!!!

Here’s my Christmas gift to the few obnoxious whiners and “Jack-wagons” out there who love to try to ruin the Christmas season for the rest of us; those malcontent and malignant few who remain all throughout their lives in some form of “arrested development”! The nasty-nagging and narcissistic few (“the tail that wags the dog”) who, quite frankly, get on my last nerve!

Arrested Development:

The term “arrested development” has had multiple meanings for over 200 years. In the field of medicine, the term “arrested development” was used, in 1835-1836, to mean a stoppage of physical development, in describing the growth of multiple bladders before birth. The term continues to be used to indicate a stoppage of physical development.

However, in the UK Mental Health Act of 1983, the term “arrested development” was considered a form of mental disorder consisting of severe mental impairment, as a lack of intelligence.[1] Other researchers have objected to the notion that mental development can be “arrested” or stopped, preferring to consider the mental status as developing in other ways, rather than the notion of mental growth as arrested. Consequently, in psychological terminology, the term “arrested development” is no longer used by them in referring to a developmental disorder in mental health. (courtesy of Wikipedia)

1) Atheists and other Malcontents:

These folks want to do away with Christmas and Christmas trees. Why? Because (if you can believe any adult could be this childish/whiny and manipulative) Christmas and Christmas trees, in particular, make a few people (the 4 to 6% who are atheist, part of “the tail that wags the dog” crew) feel “excluded”! Oh boo-hoo-hoo! Speaking of arrested development, these “Jack-wagons” never heard that “life isn’t always fair,” or that “you can’t always get what you want,” or that being a spoiled-child-like-whiner is no way to go through life, or that they should just “get over it” and “grow the hell up!” Oh yes, and that they should shut the hell up, because, like the rest of us, they’re nothing special, nothing to take notice of or write home about; no matter how “self-actualized” they may be or how many times mommy and daddy told them they were prince and princesses!

"Oh Boy, a chemistry set!"

2) Materialist “Science”:

After a full century of Darwinian/naturalist/atheistic indoctrination, in particular in our public schools, a current MSNBC poll shows that “78% of Americans doubt evolution.” So, for all of the efforts of these arrested-developmentally-advocates of Darwin’s half-baked “scientific” speculation, the great plan to do away with God is evidently failing. Remember, MSNBC is a Darwinian/naturalist/atheist/far-left promoter, and thus having to put forth this news must have been difficult for the entire organization!

It amazes me that Darwinian/naturalist/atheists should be so offended (slighted) by a pagan Godless symbol such as a Christmas tree. It also amazes me that Darwinian/naturalist/atheists should be so offended by a pagan holiday, which, by the way, Christmas truly is in almost every respect. Having said this, many (not most) of us followers of the Christ, who have taken the time and energy to study and know why we believe and what we believe, understand that Christmas is based on pagan ritualism. But we also know that the first century believers chose to celebrate the birth of Christ during this Roman pagan festival, even though they knew that Jesus, the man, was born in the Spring. If the Darwinian/naturalist/atheists would spend a little more time investigating what the truth is, then they wouldn’t have need for so much whining, complaining and boo-hooing! But, alas, these ne’er-do-wells thrive on their misery. And most of us know that “misery loves company!”

Happy Misery, then, Darwinian/naturalist/atheists (You “Bah-humbuggers”)! May you all have a Miserable & Self-involved New Year full of whining, manipulating and just plain old morose malcontentedness!

Merry Christmas to the rest of us: God bless us, every one!

“Oh Tannenbaum, Oh Tannenbaum…” :)

“We Understand Nothing”

Crying Wolf, Once Again!

The above image shows two different Time Magazine covers: one from the ’70s (on the left), when so-called “scientists” were claiming a “man-made ice age” was imminent, and the other from a current issue warning of the “impending doom” that will supposedly be caused by a “man-made global warming”, or “global climate change” (take your pick). Both of these magazine covers, in my estimation, only serve to reveal the extreme exaggerations, or bald-faced lies, of the “scientific” materialists: exaggerations and bald-faced lies that have much more to do with manipulative corporate greed, and postmodern religious-dogma, than “saving the planet”.

Below is a quote from an article a close friend sent me. The author of this article (Fred Reed) definitely knows how to cut to the chase and not pull punches:

“The immense beingness of a dark forest, the tens of millions of things—winged things, crawling things, hunting things, plants and moss and mold, soft hungry things in decomposing logs, ants, moths with huge spectral eyes, all in the intricate endless dance of life—these we do not know; we say chitinous exoskeleton and Gibb’s free energy and adenosine triphosphate and Darwin, AND BELIEVE WE UNDERSTAND WHEN WE UNDERSTAND NOTHING, NOT WHENCE NOR WHITHER NOR WHY NOR HOW…

There are scholars who believe, much to the chagrin of today’s Darwinian/atheistic anthropologists, that the earliest peoples on earth (antediluvians) were far superior to modern man: physically, intellectually and technologically (see Earth’s Earliest Ages: G.H. Pember). But these advanced human beings (not the materialists’ little green Martians) were never so arrogant as to believe they had all the answers to life.

But, as this author hints, people, today, are so in love with themselves, so full of “self-esteem”, so “self-actualized”, that they, in their adolescent-egocentric and hedonistic stupor, claim to know and understand almost everything; when, in reality, they know and “understand nothing”.

Here is how Solomon described mans’ arrogant pursuit of knowledge and wisdom:

2 “Vanity of vanities,” says the Preacher,
“Vanity of vanities! All is vanity.”

3 What advantage does man have in all his work
Which he does under the sun?

12 I, the Preacher, have been king over Israel in Jerusalem. 13 And I set my mind to seek and explore by wisdom concerning all that has been done under heaven. It is a grievous task which God has given to the sons of men to be afflicted with. 14 I have seen all the works which have been done under the sun, and behold, ALL IS VANITY AND STRIVING AFTER THE WIND. 15 What is crooked cannot be straightened and what is lacking cannot be counted.

16 I said to myself, “Behold, I have magnified and increased wisdom more than all who were over Jerusalem before me; and my mind has observed a wealth of wisdom and knowledge.” 17 And I set my mind to know wisdom and to know madness and folly; I realized that this also is striving after wind. 18 Because in much wisdom there is much grief, and increasing knowledge results in increasing pain. (Ecclesiastes 1)

Solomon, in the wisdom the Lord had granted him, understood that man can only attain to so much temporal (earthly) knowledge and wisdom, and, after that point, man’s endeavors to understand himself and his surroundings become nothing more than a vain pursuit, a chasing after the wind.

This chasing after the wind is the very picture of the postmodern/Darwinian/atheist (postmodern religionists). These postmodern religionists have a minuscule – at best – knowledge of the earth, solar system and universe, and they run with this infinitesimal bit of knowledge as if they were gods who know everything. Like an overconfident child, these “enlightened” megalomaniacs make extravagant claims about things they can’t even begin to comprehend. For instance, they claim that the universe came into existence by means of a “Big Bang”, but, when confronted with the question, “Where did the material come from for this so-called ‘Big Bang’”, they simply come up with multi-syllabic “scientific” jargon, and not-so-imaginative “multi-verse” fairy-tales, to avoid admitting that there is a God Who created them: in psychological terms, this is referred to as “intellectualizing” and “denial”. These impotent gods are so wrapped-up in their atheistic (“self-actualized”) arrogance, and “scientific” mumbo-jumbo, that they truly believe they have become omniscient (“all knowing”):

A hazard of being the most intelligent creature in the neighborhood is that IT FOSTERS AN ILLUSION OF OMNISCIENCE. Today we prostrate ourselves before the sciences, which tell us tales of origin and destiny, about which THEY KNOW NOTHING AND CAN GUESS LESS THAN THE MOST MINOR OF POETS. But we have no poets, and so accept the SOLEMN NARROW TWADDLE of the laboratories. Oh well. Perhaps the best that can be said of scientists is that the brightest of a large number of hamsters IS STILL A HAMSTER.” (emphasis added)

via Fred On Everything.

“Oh well. Perhaps the best that can be said of scientists is that THE BRIGHTEST OF A LARGE NUMBER OF HAMSTERS IS STILL A HAMSTER.” Humans look pretty intelligent, when compared with hamsters! So what! Perhaps these Darwin-worshipers should, as returning Roman conquerors, have slaves, following right behind them, day-in and day-out, who continually whisper in their ears, “All glory is fleeting! You are still mortal!”

For all out there who would deny the Creator and brag about man’s knowledge and technological advances, I would ask this: Where are your “scientific” gods now, Mr. and Ms. Postmodern/Atheist (so cool, so brilliant), when the entire Gulf of Mexico is being destroyed by the very oil that your own personal (materialistic) “scientific” gods, through their “advanced technology”, brought to the surface? So why, now, when they are needed so desperately, can’t your Darwinian heroes (materialistic, “scientific” gods) figure out how to put an end to this catastrophe and save the Gulf? What’s the matter, guys, is your love of Darwin and humanity (your perverse love of self), and denial of God, failing you at the moment? Come on, you “enlightened” supermen and superwomen, suck-up that oil, seal that leak, restore the vitality of the Gulf, heal those suffering animals and fishes, and restore the livelihoods of millions of people along the Gulf coast and beyond. You believe you’re omniscient, so put your money where your “politically-correct”, “tolerant” and God-hating mouths are, and rescue all of us from this out-of-control disaster!

What’s this I hear? Oh yes, I recognize this! It’s silence!

Goodbye, Gulf of Mexico! Goodbye, dolphins, fishes, crabs, shrimp, oysters, pelicans, marshes and estuaries! Goodbye, fishing industry and tourist trade! Goodbye, income of millions of working people along the coast and beyond! Hello, postmodern world of materialistic, Godless and worthless “science”! Welcome to what’s left of the world that, in their earth-bound, Spiritual ignorance, and obnoxious arrogance, the postmodern/atheists continue to destroy!

P.S.

Robert Jastrow (b. 1925 d. 2008) PhD Theoretical Physics recipient of NASA Medal for Exceptional Scientific Achievement

At present, SCIENCE HAS NO SATISFACTORY ANSWER to the question of the origin of life on the earth. Perhaps the appearance of life on the earth is a miracle. Scientists are reluctant to accept that view, but THEIR CHOICES ARE LIMITED; either life was created on the earth by the will of a being outside the grasp of scientific understanding, or it evolved on our planet spontaneously, through chemical reactions occurring in nonliving matter lying on the surface of the planet. The first theory places the question of the origin of life beyond the reach of scientific inquiry. It is a statement of faith in the power of a Supreme Being not subject to the laws of science. THE SECOND THEORY IS ALSO AN ACT OF FAITH. The act of faith consists in assuming that the scientific view of the origin of life is correct, WITHOUT HAVING CONCRETE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THAT BELIEF. Until the Sun Dies (1977) pp. 62-63

The details differ, but the essential elements in the astronomical and biblical accounts of Genesis are the same: the chain of events leading to man commenced suddenly and sharply at a definite moment in time, in a flash of light and energy … For the scientist WHO HAS LIVED BY HIS FAITH IN THE POWER OF REASON, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountain of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries. God and the Astronomers (1992) pp.106-107 (emphasis added)

Note: Robert Jastrow was a true man of science (a rarity in this day and age), and not some narcissistic and materialistic PhD who simply feels free to make-it-up as he (or she) goes.

The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)! (Follow-Up)

J. Craig Venter (Darwinian Megalomaniac) Proclaims, "It's Alive! My 'Synthetic Bacterium' is Alive! There is no God! I'm God"

This is a follow-up post to The Desensitizing & Dehumanizing Affect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics!.

As a former composer, I understand that taking a small segment of existing music (melody, chord progression) and using that small segment to create a new piece of music is not composition (the creation of new music), it is, instead, the “arranging” of music that already exists:

The American Federation of Musicians defines arranging as “the art of preparing and adapting an already written composition for presentation in other than its original form

via Arrangement – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Arranging, then, is different from the creation of new music (composition): musical composing is the act of creating new music. So a composer, in one sense, is a creator, whereas an “arranger” is a person who uses an existing composition to produce a “musical arrangement”.

In much the same way, then, a group of “young Frankensteins” (“genetic scientists”) can take previously created (God breathed) DNA and, with the help of a computer program, ARRANGE it in such a way as to produce, or MAKE (not create), a “synthetic” cell. This arranging of life is not creation, nor does it solve any mystery about life, since the DNA (or DNA model) used for replication, by this computer software, had already been created by the Lord, in the beginning.

On May 20th, 2010, it was announced that a bacterial cell had been “synthetically created”:

May 20, 2010

Researchers say they created a ‘synthetic cell’

by Nicholas Wade

The New York Times

The genome pioneer J. Craig Venter has taken another step in his quest to create synthetic life, by synthesizing an entire bacterial genome and using it to take over a cell.

Dr. Venter calls the result a “synthetic cell” and is presenting the research as a landmark achievement that will open the way to creating useful microbes from scratch to make products like vaccines and biofuels. At a press conference Thursday, Dr. Venter described the converted cell as “the first self-replicating species we’ve had on the planet whose parent is a computer.”

“This is a philosophical advance as much as a technical advance,” he said, suggesting that the “synthetic cell” raised new questions about the nature of life

Other scientists agree that he has achieved a technical feat in synthesizing the largest piece of DNA so far… (emphasis added)

via Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.

Let’s look at the word “synthetic”:

1) Relating to, involving, or of the nature of synthesis.
2) Chemistry. Produced by synthesis, especially not of natural origin.

a) Not natural or genuine; artificial or contrived: “counterfeit rhetoric that flourishes when passions are synthetic” (George F. Will).
b) Prepared or made artificially…

Seems to me this “materialistic scientific” zealot is jumping, as is the case with most Darwinian atheists, to a totally unsubstantiated conclusion: Venter hasn’t created anything, he’s simply taken what the Lord created and ARRANGED it into a “synthetic” form (“not natural or genuine, artificial or contrived”), and with the help of a computer program no less! I don’t believe I remember anything about the Lord needing the help of a computer program to create the entire universe.

"I'm so Alone!"

By this young Frankenstein’s use of the word “synthetic”, he has only succeeded in disqualifying his weak ARRANGEMENT of the Lord’s DNA from being considered “a creation”, according to the original meaning of the word:

Creation:

The divine act by which, according to various religious and philosophical traditions, the world was brought into existence.

When this developmentally arrested, in a philosophical, moral and ethical sense, ne’er-do-well (modern eugenics monster) creates a brand new form of life, alive and functioning, and from scratch (not ARRANGED), then he can claim there is no God, and he is the creator: by “a brand new form of life”, I mean a living cell that comes into existence through the use of something other than DNA (real or “synthetic”). Until he’s created this totally new form of life, Venter simply needs to go back to his Frankenstein lab and merely think of himself as an “ARRANGER” of the Lord’s Creation. That is if Venter doesn’t want his Creator sending a not “synthetically produced” bacterium to cause serious damage to him and his assistant (Igor: “Yes, master!”): you know, like “plagues”, the “wrath of God” stuff!

{Just kidding, the Lord is probably laughing at this overeducated twerp and his little “ARRANGED” cell. In the eyes of the only Creator, Venter is probably just another atheist mouse who is attempting to roar! Or to coin Will Shakespeare: “What fools these mortals be!”}

So, I will close with an “ARRANGEMENT” of an old country hit’s lyrics: “Mothers, don’t let your boys grow up to be Darwinian atheists!” If you do, this will be the result: lab coated socio, psychopaths!

An Unregenerate Perversion of Materialistic Science

When we believe, without substantiation, that human life came about by chance and mutation (“natural selection”), and that man has no other existence beyond this brief eighty year span, then we, without knowledge and discernment, devalue life in every human being (and nature also). This devaluing of life, then, leads to all kinds of perversions and atrocities, since there is, in this warped, Godless view, no sanctity or preciousness of life: in this ugly scenario, there is nothing after this life but darkness and nothingness, and this darkness and nothingness leads to a degenerating of mankind, in mankind’s own subconscious mind and heart.

And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, 30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; 32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them. (Romans 1)

The following Pew Forum article is just one example of this kind of darkness, this kind of degenerate (“reasonable”, “intellectual”) disease:

December 17, 2009

Elderly in suicide pill Christmas gift swaps

by Jeremy Pierce

The Courier-Mail

Elderly couples are buying each other suicide kits as Christmas presents, says controversial euthanasia campaigner Dr Philip Nitschke.

Speaking at Tweed Heads yesterday on a new “peaceful pill” suicide method being developed overseas, Dr Nitschke’s comments sent right-to-life campaigners and church groups into a frenzy.

Asked whether it was in the spirit of the season to be publicising ways of ending life just a week before Christmas, Dr Nitschke said he was always going to attract criticism.”Our main opposition is from religious groups who would still be getting outraged at Easter, or any other time of year for that matter,” he said. (emphasis added)

via Religion News: Elderly in suicide pill Christmas gift swaps.

For those with no faith in the Lord (their Creator), suffering can be overwhelming, but the suffering they endure, now, will be nothing in comparison to that which they will experience as they stand before their Creator on that coming day. On that day there will be no excuses accepted for pain and suffering in this world. Besides, many unregenerate and arrogant people choose to commit suicide simply because they believe it’s their right: these self-absorbed “advanced primates” believe they have the right to a “dignified” death.

Here is what the Lord has to say on this subject:

‘You shall not murder. (Deuteronomy 5: 17)

Euthanasia, or assisted suicide, and suicide are murder!

Darwin's "Natural Selection" (Evolution) & Galton's Eugenics: A Dehumanizing Legacy! (Follow-Up)

Charles Darwin: A Sullen Man Devoid of God

This is a follow up post to Darwin’s Evolution & Galton’s Eugenics: A Dehumanizing Legacy!

When unregenerate man’s “science” and philosophies/ideologies deny God as Creator, then life is devalued greatly among those (the unregenerate and pagan) who have been blinded in this age:

And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, 4 in whose case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. (2 Corinthians 4)

It can be no other way, no matter what the Darwinian-atheist claims, since the only value in life is its eternal nature, and the fact that a sovereign and benevolent Creator brought it into existence. Without this truth, human life becomes no more valuable or precious than a tree, a plant, a slug, or a piece of wood.

The following article (atheist rag) was written by Peter Singer, a man who cares more for animals than human beings.

November 18, 2009

Opinion: Voluntary consent is neglected in the euthanasia debate

by Peter Singer

The Daily Star

Of all the arguments against voluntary euthanasia, the most influential is the “slippery slope”: Once we allow doctors to kill patients, we will not be able to limit the killing to those who want to die. There is no evidence for this claim, even after many years of legal physician-assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia in The Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and the American state of Oregon. But recent revelations about what took place in a New Orleans hospital after Hurricane Katrina point to a genuine danger from a different source.

When New Orleans was flooded in August 2005, the rising water cut off Memorial Medical Center, a community hospital that was holding more than 200 patients. Three days after the hurricane hit, the hospital had no electricity, the water supply had failed, and toilets could no longer be flushed. Some patients who were dependent on ventilators died.

In stifling heat, doctors and nurses were hard-pressed to care for surviving patients lying on soiled beds. Adding to the anxiety were fears that law and order had broken down in the city, and that the hospital itself might be a target for armed bandits.

Helicopters were called in to evacuate patients. Priority was given to those who were in better health, and could walk. State police arrived and told staff that because of the civil unrest, everybody had to be out of the hospital by 5:00 p.m. (emphasis added)

via Religion News: Opinion: Voluntary consent is neglected in the euthanasia debate.

Singer is a living, breathing example of what a Darwinian-humanistic-atheist amounts to: a desensitized, pompous and Godless robot who, being in some form of arrested development, cannot see the trees for the forest! For those who didn’t click on the links above, here are just a few samples of Singer’s perverse and upside-down philosophy:

“In Animal Liberation, Singer argues against what he calls speciesism: discrimination on the grounds that a being belongs to a certain species. He holds the interests of all beings capable of suffering to be worthy of equal consideration, and that giving lesser consideration to beings based on their species is no more justified than discrimination based on skin color. He argues that animals should have rights based on their ability to feel pain more than their intelligence. In particular, he argues that while animals show lower intelligence than the average human, many severely retarded humans show equally diminished, if not lower, mental capacity, and that some animals have displayed signs of intelligence (for example, primates learning elements of American sign language and other symbolic languages) sometimes on par with that of human children, and that therefore intelligence does not provide a basis for providing nonhuman animals any less consideration than such retarded humans.”

“Singer states that arguments for or against abortion should be based on utilitarian calculation which weighs the preferences of a mother against the preferences of the fetus. In his view a preference is anything sought to be obtained or avoided; all forms of benefit or harm caused to a being correspond directly with the satisfaction or frustration of one or more of its preferences. Since a capacity to experience the sensations of suffering or satisfaction is a prerequisite to having any preferences at all, and a fetus, at least up to around eighteen weeks, says Singer, has no capacity to suffer or feel satisfaction, it is not possible for such a fetus to hold any preferences at all. In a utilitarian calculation, there is nothing to weigh against a mother’s preferences to have an abortion, therefore abortion is morally permissible.”

Peter Singer – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Singer is the vile and sadistic product of evolution and eugenics, as were Hitler and Stalin. He views people as nothing more than happenstance creatures who, if not fit for life, are doomed to “extinguish”. Yet Singer has great respect for animal life: this is the retro-grade inversion of life, the life led by the enemy of our Lord!

Here is yet another sign of Darwin’s dehumanizing legacy:

One in 4 Teen Girls Has a Sexually Transmitted Disease.

Got that? 25% of American teenage girls are infected with a disease brought about by harlotry!

Perhaps America should lower the “age of consent” to eleven or twelve years of age, since this seems to be the age that “knowledgeable” (at least in a clinical sense) sexual activity begins in adolescents? Yes sir, we’ve come along way in our “enlightened”, “reasoning” society! We’ve come a long way towards turning the whole world into Sodom and Gomorrah!

We look at sexuality, and almost every other sin, as being a small thing in comparison to the other ills of this world (wars, famine, etc), but what we can’t comprehend is that the major issues are all connected to these supposed “lesser things”: the way we choose to live and what we choose to value can either bring us closer to the Lord or simply open the door for more and more deviance. “If it feels good, do it!” was a big joke in the late 1960s, but the consequences of that mentality, that mindset, are no joke today, as the above article sadly reveals!

In short, Darwin managed, in his Spiritual ignorance, to unleash a demonic produced hypothesis (a lack of Spiritual discernment brain-fart) on the world that would ultimately devalue human life. If we are descended from a “common ancestor” which ultimately, by “chance”, “mutated” into a puke-eating chimpanzee, then why would we value human life or be concerned with man’s “morals” and “ethics”? If man is descended from a slug that magically (through “chance” and “mutation”) became a chimp, and then us, then life is not precious in any way, and man’s “morals” and “ethics” are meaningless: after all, what mutated chimpanzee has the right to tell me, or anyone else for that matter, how to behave and live?

Our innate sense that life is sacred comes from our Creator, our Lord and Savior, Jesus the Christ! We are appalled at murder and young girls and boys being sexually active because of the Lord and His presence in and around us!

The curse placed on Adam and Eve, and all of creation, will be overturned when Christ returns in great power and glory. Man’s inadequate, arrogant and sophomoric “science”, “religions” and philosophies are not the answer to the “evil” found in fallen man and nature, only the Christ is!

Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you thinks that he is wise in this age, he must become foolish, so that he may become wise. 19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness before God. For it is written, “He is THE ONE WHO CATCHES THE WISE IN THEIR CRAFTINESS”; 20 and again, “THE LORD KNOWS THE REASONINGS of the wise, THAT THEY ARE USELESS.” (1 Corinthians 3)

Darwin's "Natural Selection" (Evolution) & Galton's Eugenics: A Dehumanizing Legacy!

The Ungodly Fruit of Darwin: Eugenics

In unregenerate man’s narcissistic and depraved quest to circumvent the curse of Adam, he has managed to devolve into a creature that has not existed before. A creature that is so self involved (“self-actualized”, “self-esteemed”, or in love with its self) that it is willing to destroy and murder much, or even most, of humankind in order to achieve its own political and social ends (under the guise of “science” and “progress”): a Godless, postmodern utopia, where the beautiful, brilliant, powerful, wealthy, and politically correct few get rid of the ugly, the average intellect, the weak, the more-or-less poor and politically incorrect many (“the unworthy of life”)!

For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and EXCHANGED the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.

24 Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25 For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served THE CREATURE rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, GOD GAVE THEM OVER TO A DEPRAVED MIND, to do those things which are not proper, 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, 30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; 32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them. (Romans 1)

The roots of this Godless, inhumane ideology and despotism began, in earnest, in nineteenth century England with Charles Darwin (“natural selection”: evolution), and his cousin, Francis Galton (eugenics: “well born”).

{Note: the idea of certain individuals being lesser than others, due to race, looks, intellect, etc, has been a recurring theme throughout human history, but Darwin and Galton would give this recurring theme new life and validity with their supposed “scientific” hypotheses.}

It should not be surprising, then, that England, and its corrupted offspring, the U S of A, are two of the leading perpetrators in this world, when it comes to murdering babies in their mother’s wombs:

November 12, 2009

Britain the abortion capital of Europe: Terminations for teenagers leap by a third

by Steve Doughty

The Daily Mail

More abortions are carried out in Britain than any other country in Europe, research has shown.

It has overtaken France – which has a larger population – to become the abortion capital of the continent.

The rising rate has been pushed up by abortions among teenage girls, which increased by nearly a third over the past decade.

Half of all pregnancies among girls under 18 in Britain end in abortion. (emphasis added)

via Religion News: Britain the abortion capital of Europe: Terminations for teenagers leap by a third.

Imagine that, a country that proclaims, “God save the Queen!”, over and over again, is the European leader in the murder of innocent children : “More abortions are carried out in Britain than any other country in Europe”, “Half of all pregnancies among girls under 18 in Britain end in abortion.”, “…the abortion capital of the continent”! The U S of A is no better!

This, then, is the legacy of a pseudo-religious nation which, through supposed “reason”, and “enlightenment”, had given birth to two corrupting hypotheses (“natural selection”, eugenics) that would ultimately lead to the sterilization of thousands throughout the world, and the torture and murder of millions more in Nazi Germany. These Godless and corrupted hypotheses came from two confused men who, in their lacking of Spiritual discernment, could not understand and/or accept the truth of the word of God : through the fall of Adam, death (the curse) came and ruled on the earth, and throughout the universe. The Lord had created everything in perfection, but man had chosen against the Lord’s Life and Truth (as he still does) and had, instead, embraced the lies of His enemy. This failure of man, in turn, led to the decay and death of all the creation.

For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory that is to be revealed to us. 19 For the anxious longing of THE CREATION waits eagerly for the revealing of the sons of God. 20 For THE CREATION was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it, in hope 21 that THE CREATION itself also WILL BE SET FREE FROM ITS SLAVERY TO CORRUPTION into the freedom of the glory of the children of God. 22 For we know that the whole creation groans and suffers the pains of childbirth together until now. 23 And not only this, but also we ourselves, having the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our body. 24 For in hope we have been saved, but hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he already sees? 25 But if we hope for what we do not see, with perseverance we wait eagerly for it. (Romans 8:)

The discrepancies that Darwin encountered in nature (the Creation) were not the proof of a “natural”, uncaring creator (natural selection), as he so mistakenly claimed. These discrepancies were, instead, the proof of the fall of man (Adam), and the subsequent effects that fall had on all of creation. In his apostate, “religious” blindness, and humanistic arrogance, Darwin could not comprehend the truth of the Lord, so he turned, as Adam had, to the lie of the enemy : “A loving Creator would not have allowed this *evil to occur!” In other words, Darwin was stating, “A loving and benevolent Creator would not have made these illogical, “evil” (theodicy) and cruel errors in His creation. Therefore, life must have come about by chance and mutation and is controlled by natural selection, the true god!” (*see DARWIN’S GOD: Cornelius Hunter)

The despotic effects of evolution and eugenics can be seen all around us. The Darwinian-atheist (materialists) would have us believe that evolution had nothing to do with eugenics, and that eugenics had nothing to do with the atrocities of the first half of the twentieth century, but history makes them out to be what they are : totally confused or LIARS!

In the Darwinian-atheists’ world, everything is upside down and backwards. They live in a world where there are no absolute truths, there’s only what the Darwinian-atheist wants, and when he or she wants it. These lost people live in an ungodly, childish and arrogant world, where the tail always wags the dog: a world where the blinded beautiful, wealthy and powerful few seek to lead the blind, naive and vulnerable masses. These people rule our nation, and the world! Your children are brainwashed by them every day in public schools (even parochial and private schools), on television, in movies, in music, and even on the nightly news broadcast.

Here is an example of what I’m referring to:

Clarence Gamble, was a descendant of one of the original founders of this company. Femist author Angela Franks has the following to say about this man:

He wrote: “To date less [sic] than 2,000 insane and mentally defective North Carolinians have been sterilized under the existing law–a figure that represents less than one out of every 41 of the State’s estimated mentally unfit. This means that for every one man or woman who has been sterilized, there are 40 others who can continue to POUR DEFECTIVE GENES into the State’s blood stream TO POLLUTE AND DEGRADE FUTURE GENERATION.” (Clarence J. Gamble, “Better Human Beings Tomorrow, ” Better Health, October 1947, 14, 15)

Eugenics-Watch.org has the following to say:

Clarence J. Gamble used part of the fortune made by Procter & Gamble products (including soap) to finance birth control projects for the poor in many parts of the world. He helped to push through legislation in 1937 legalizing birth control in Puerto Rico; the law specified that birth control material was to be distributed by trained eugenicists. He supported birth control distribution in Appalachia and in rural Japan. A leader in Margaret Sanger’s Birth Control Federation, he suggested that they set up a “Negro Project,” using black clergy and physicians to promote birth control. He founded the Pathfinder Fund, to promote population control around the world. (emphasis added)

via David Rothscum Reports: Is Procter and Gamble funding a mass sterilization campaign?.

Here is another:

In the first three decades of the 20th Century, American corporate philanthropy combined with prestigious academic fraud to create the pseudoscience eugenics that institutionalized race politics as national policy. The goal: create a superior, white, Nordic race and obliterate the viability of everyone else.

How? By identifying so-called “defective” family trees and subjecting them to legislated segregation and sterilization programs. The victims: poor people, brown-haired white people, African Americans, immigrants, Indians, Eastern European Jews, the infirm and really anyone classified outside the superior genetic lines drawn up by American raceologists. The main culprits were the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune, in league with America’s most respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as Harvard, Yale and Princeton, operating out of a complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island. The eugenic network worked in tandem with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the State Department and numerous state governmental bodies and legislatures throughout the country, and even the U.S. Supreme Court. They were all bent on breeding a eugenically superior race, just as agronomists would breed better strains of corn. The plan was to wipe away the reproductive capability of the weak and inferior.

Ultimately, 60,000 Americans were coercively sterilized — legally and extra-legally. Many never discovered the truth until decades later. Those who actively supported eugenics include America’s most progressive figures: Woodrow Wilson, Margaret Sanger and Oliver Wendell Holmes. (emphasis added)

War Against the Weak.

The Darwinian-atheists promote their creation-myths (evolution, natural-selection), medical-research (genetics) and “scientific” myths (“string theories”, “multi-universes”, etc), in order to convince the whole world that God doesn’t exist. They long for a humanistic (postmodern) utopia, where humanity is the only god. To accomplish this, the Darwinian-atheist must weed out the weak, the unfit for life, so their god, natural selection, may have its perfect will be done. Natural selection will never allow for “inferior” human beings to become gods, so the Darwinian-atheist must seek to carry out natural selection’s will, “the survival of the fittest”.

The propagandists of genetic engineering (selective breeding) will continue to put forth progress myths such as, “Genetic research is for the betterment of all of humanity!” But what these eugenicists-in-sheep’s-clothing are really saying is this: “If we weed out the weak and “feeble-minded”, and, in turn, strengthen the genetic pool (the Aryan, Nordic ideal), then we can all live together, in perfection and forever, without having to deal, ever again, with the infirm, ugly, stupid, mentally-imbalanced and criminal element in this world!”

Wake up, folks! “Designer babies” are not a new and wonderful advancement in modern “science”, they’re the byproduct of eugenics and Nazi research! What we see from modern genetics, today, was the ultimate goal of Galton, the American Eugenics Society, and Adolph Hitler’s Third Reich. The holocaust never really stopped, it just took on new victims: the poor and infirm, the mentally disabled, and millions upon millions of unwanted, unborn children, FULLY ALIVE in their mother’s wombs!

When the ABSOLUTE TRUTHS of God are ignored or done away with, then everything is up for grabs, “It’s all relative, man!” “I have my view of truth also, man!” “Hey, man, we gave up that God stuff in the ’60s, so get out of my face!” “There is no God, man, my ancestors were chimpanzees!” Absolute and ungodly relativistic reasoning will always corrupt absolutely!