“No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans (Follow-Up #2)

One example of the children "RAISED BY THE ENTIRE VILLAGE!"

This is a follow-up post to “No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans, and “No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans (Follow-Up)

Please read, at the least, “No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans (Follow-Up) before you read this final post. That way, this post will make more sense to you! I hope?

6) “IT TAKES A MATURE, RESPONSIBLE AND LOVING [CHRIST-LIKE] FATHER AND MOTHER TO RAISE A CHILD, NOT THE ENTIRE SCREWED-UP VILLAGE!”

“IT TAKES THE ENTIRE VILLAGE TO RAISE A CHILD” This is what the postmodern/politically-correct/atheists, today, pander as the way to properly raise a child. They, however, have an ulterior motive, in my opinion, and that motive is, if “the entire village raises the child,” then the “entire village” can tell each and every American parent how to raise their child: “the village” can invade not only the school-systems, which it already owns and operates, but the parent’s homes as well, and indoctrinate them and their children in a postmodern-atheistic way of life. A postmodern/feminist/sodomite/atheist way of life, a despotic political agenda, that is set on drawing all parents, and their children, away from the truth and life of our Creator, Lord and Savior.

{One of my reasons for writing these posts has been to make parents more skeptical of what school and government officials put out there as cutesy, little slogans, which have the sole purpose of making parents believe, in a perennial sophomoric way, that these school and government officials have nothing other than their children’s best interests at heart. They do NOT have your children’s best interests at heart! These vermin are looking out only for their own ungodly and doomed-to-make-things-worse, political-ideological desires and agendas. Parents, you and your children are nothing more than pawns that these manipulative and despotic vermin seek to move around a world-sized chess-board. Wake up, sleepers, and smell the coffee!}

If you have ever watched the evening news and witnessed what happens in African villages, then you should know “the entire village” can’t protect itself, or “the child,” from starvation, rape, mass murder and genocide. So, then, how can any “American village,” modeling itself after this African version, “raise the child” properly? In particular, how can the American, inner-city ghetto, which suffers almost the same ills as its African counterpart, truly raise its children properly?

{For those of you who play manipulative games with words, if you don’t know what I mean by PROPERLY, then look up the definition in Webster’s. I’m sick to death of wasting time on semantics!}

The Lord gave a child to its mother and father only! He did not give the child to be a cog in the political/social machinery of this or any other man-conceived society and government.

If we want to get back to a sane time, some fifty years ago, when children were raised by their parents, and they didn’t take automatic weapons to school to murder their peers and teachers, then we must get “the village” (the local, state and federal governments and morally-bankrupt school-systems) out of our homes and away from our children. It is “the entire village” that is truly, and without hesitation, molesting our children, educationally, philosophically, physically/morally (as in endorsed sexual misconduct: “sex-ed”). In this case, and many more, the Parts (children) are, by far, greater (of more importance) than the Whole (society and government).

If parents want to put an end to the negative effects being perpetrated on their children by this despotic, Godless society/government, then they will need to do everything they can to keep their children from being indoctrinated by its eduction-system, entertainment-industry (MTV, music, movies, sitcoms, etc), and nightly-news propaganda-machine.

Parents must Know what is going on in their children’s lives. And the best way for them to know is by taking control of their children’s education. In other words, parents, take responsibility for your children and home-school them.

As I stated in the slogan: “IT TAKES A MATURE, RESPONSIBLE AND LOVING [CHRIST-LIKE] FATHER AND MOTHER TO RAISE A CHILD…” A life centered in Christ, and His way and truth, is the sole responsibility of the parent and child, not “the entire village”.

I have written on this subject before:

“It Takes An Entire Village to Raise A Child?” In the Good Old Hedonistic & “I-Did-It-My-Way” U. S. of A.? « An Outsider’s Sojourn.

****************************************************************************************

9/29/11

The following is yet another example of why we shouldn’t allow “the entire village” to be involved in the raising of our children!

VACAVILLE, CA – When Taylor McGinley sneezed in her health class at Will C. Wood High School a few weeks ago a student replied with “God, bless you,” but it’s what teacher Steven Cuckovich said after the sneeze that now has students questioning the teacher’s agenda.

“(Cuckovich) said, ‘Do you think that girl is evil, do you think the evil spirits are coming out of her?’ And the guy that said “bless you” was like ‘No, I was just doing what I was supposed to do when somebody sneezes, not trying to be rude,’” Taylor said, referring to the incident.

McGinley said Cuckovich never mentioned or referred to the expression again, but in Erica Fagan’s class Cuckovich is deducting points from students’ grades if someone said “bless you.”

“The first time (the student) did it (Cuckovich) took 25 points off of everybody in the class’s grade for one person saying it and then somebody did it the next day and he did it again,” Fagan said.

According to Fagan, Cuckovich told the students sneezing and saying “bless you” is a distraction and takes time out of learning.

via Vacaville student docked 25 points on test for saying ‘God bless you’ | news10.net.

****************************************************************************************

7) “‘JOHNNY HAS TWO MOMMIES,’ THEN JOHNNY WILL HAVE MENTAL, EMOTIONAL AND PHYSICAL (SEXUAL) PROBLEMS!”

Like it or not, perversion is perversion, and mental and emotional/spiritual illness is mental and emotional/spiritual illness. Homosexuality is a disease of the mind, body and heart (the soul), and, as with any other disease, homosexuality must be treated so those infected with it may be healed. Homosexuals, like anyone else who is sick, must make the decision, for themselves (it is their responsibility), to seek a treatment and cure. And the physician the homosexual should seek out is the only Physician Who can truly help them be healed: their Creator, Lord and Savior, Jesus the Christ.

People were not made by the Lord to become what He detests! The Lord is not a mentally and emotionally ill pervert, and all of us, every last one, were made in His and His Father’s image. We were not created to be perverse!

Perversion will beget perversion (in any form, not just homosexuality), just as violence will beget violence. If Johnny has sodomites for “parents”, then he will pay the price for that sometime, and in some way, sooner or later in life.

Enough said.

8) “DO NOT VALUE ANYTHING SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS DIVERSE (DIFFERENT), INSTEAD, LEARN TO DISCERN WHAT IS WORTHY OF BEING VALUED, WHETHER IT BE DIVERSE OR NOT!”

“RESPECT IS NOT A RIGHT!”

The postmodern-atheist calls on everyone to have an “open-mind,” “be tolerant,” and “value diversity”. The postmodern-atheist, however, doesn’t always practice what he or she preaches. For instance, when it comes to Christians, apostate or sons of God, the postmodern-atheist is anything but open-minded, tolerant, and a valuer of diversity, and, therefore, the postmodern-atheist is a hypocrite. But I digress.

I will not value anything merely on the basis of its diversity: the difference between something and everything else around it. This is one of the major problems I see with this country: the almost total blindness needed to be “tolerant” and “politically-correct” (a willful lacking-in-discernment) is what has led to the majority of young Americans, in almost every aspect of life, being such obnoxious panderers of mediocrity.

Respect is not a right, it is earned. And if a foreign culture is not deemed worthy of my respect, then that culture, no matter how politically-correct (politically-IN) it may be, will never get it! And if a human being is not deemed worthy of my respect (beyond respect for a human life), then that human being, no matter how politically-correct (politically-IN) he or she may be, will never get it! I decide who and what receives my respect, not this lame society’s middle-school-peer-pressure tactics: “tolerance,” political-correctness,” and “valuing diversity.”

For more on my stand on these two issues, I refer you to slogan numbers 4 and 5 in the last post.

A True Hero!

9) “HERO IS AN OVERUSED WORD TODAY!”

The word hero has lost its meaning and impact. Today, everyone is a hero: paid soldiers are heroes, cops on the beat are heroes, people who give blood are heroes.

Not in my opinion! I saw heroes on September 11, 2001. I saw New York City firemen climbing the stairs of the World Trade Center towers for the sole purpose of saving lives, and you could see in the expression on their faces, they knew they were going to die. These men were true HEROES! An overweight cop eating a donut and drinking coffee, or a soldier killing people in the name of democracy and freedom, these are not heroes. True heroes put their lives at risk to save lives, not brutally take them.

10) “I PLEDGE MY ALLEGIANCE TO MY LORD AND SAVIOR!”

“‘TO LIVE IS CHRIST,’ NOT DEMOCRACY/CAPITALISM!”

“CHRIST IS NOT AN AMERICAN!”

I make no oath or pledge to anyone or anything other than my Lord and Savior, and, by His command, I don’t even make an oath to Him.

33“Again, you have heard that the ancients were told, ‘YOU SHALL NOT MAKE FALSE VOWS, BUT SHALL FULFILL YOUR VOWS TO THE LORD.’ 34“But I say to you, MAKE NO OATH (NO PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE) AT ALL, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, 35OR BY EARTH, for it is the footstool of His feet, or by Jerusalem, for it is THE CITY OF THE GREAT KING. 36“Nor shall you make an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. 37“But let your statement be, ‘Yes, yes’ or ‘No, no’; anything beyond these is of EVIL. (Matthew 5)

My reason for going on living in this rotten world is due solely to Christ being my life. I have no other reason to live, but Christ:

21For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain. (Philippians 1)

Listen up! Christ is not an American, nor has He ordained this country to be the Christian savior of the world.

11) “…GOVERNMENT OF THE WEALTHY AND POWERFUL FEW, BY THE WEALTHY AND POWERFUL FEW, FOR THE WEALTHY AND POWERFUL FEW…”

This slogan speaks for itself!

“No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans (Follow-Up)

This is a follow up post to “No Child Left Behind:” One of Many Meaningless, Politically-Motivated Slogans.

In the original post, I made up some slogans that convey my thoughts and opinions on politics and life in America today. And, since some are pretty controversial, I thought I would go through them and explain where I’m coming from.

1) “AMERICANS WHO PROFIT THE MOST SHOULD PAY THE MOST TAXES!”

“ASK NOT WHAT WE CAN DO FOR CORPORATE AMERICA, ASK WHAT CORPORATE AMERICA CAN DO FOR US!”

This is pretty cut and dry. America is like a huge country-club, and everyone in this country-club [supposedly] pays dues (taxes) to belong. There are different levels of membership in the American country-club: some pay more dues in the club (or should anyway), because they get the extreme perks, the top benefits, the club offers, and some can only afford to pay a small amount of dues, so they get less.

Those who benefit most from this corporate-capitalist country-club should be FORCED to pay the most dues (taxes), since they enjoy the greatest benefits this country-club has to offer. And, on the other side, those who benefit less from this country-club should pay the least in dues (taxes). This, however, is not the case! The wealthy-elite pay hardly anything, when they are basically getting all the perks the club has to offer. Meanwhile, the folks who truly can’t afford the smallest amount of dues are picking up the tab for the wealthy-elite. This would be fine if this were a monarchy, since, then, it would be known up front that the wealthy and powerful would maintain and grow, while the peasants struggled in the dirt and “ate cake.” But this is the land of the so-called “American Dream,” and thus this kind of membership program is nothing but a manipulative, hypocritical lie, a complete fraud!

There was a time, some fifty years ago, when the wealthy-elite paid taxes at a rate of 90%. I am not for that, by the way. But I do believe a 60% tax-rate, WITHOUT ANY LOOPHOLES OF ANY KIND, for the wealthy-elite would be more than fair. The American middle-class made these people rich and powerful. And how do the wealthy-elite repay the middle class for all of their hard work and sacrifices over the years? They repay them with work outsourced to other countries, bald-faced lies, and corporate/bank corruption that has basically destroyed the world economy.

Here is an example of the out-of-balance tax-system I’m referring to:

CEOs who make more than their companies pay in taxes

Twenty-five of the 100 highest paid U.S. CEOs (including some with Chicago ties) earned more last year than their companies paid in federal income tax, a pay study by a Washington think tank said on Wednesday. See who some of them are, in order of their compensation. To see the entire survey, click here.

via CEOs who make more than their companies pay in taxes – chicagotribune.com.

2)”AMERICA: ONE NATION [NOT] UNDER GOD!”

“IN CORRUPT POWER AND GREED WE TRUST!”

This nation is as ungodly as the most perverse and corrupt nation that ever existed on the face of the earth, including communist countries. In fact, communist countries are honest about their atheistic political and economic ideologies: unlike the hypocrites in this country, the communists don’t use our Lord and Savior as a political device or magic genie. The communists are upfront about their atheism, and, therefore, although I despise atheism, I can respect them more than the disgusting hypocritical nature of most Americans.

I have written on this subject more than once:

Deism, “Reason” + the “Founding Fathers” = “The Separation of Church and State” « An Outsider’s Sojourn.

America: “A Christian Nation?” Think Again! (Reprise) « An Outsider’s Sojourn.

3) “‘FREEDOM AIN’T FREE,’ THEN THE COST IS TOO HIGH!”

“Freedom ain’t free” is just another low-life, idiotic/patriotic excuse for going to war and murdering tens of thousands of innocent men, women and children: it’s nothing more than a capitalist-propaganda slogan to get ignorant/patriotic Americans in a flag-waving, shouting, “U S A-U S A,” frenzy, so the wealthy-elite can wage war and get wealthier and more powerful. The US of A, today, makes the Japan of one-hundred years ago look like Gandhi, when it comes to waging war-for-profit on the poor and weak, the disenfranchised in this world!

If the sacrificing of human life at the alter of freedom (democracy) and capitalism is the cost to be paid, then the cost is not only too high, it’s despotic and inhumane, it is evil!

4) “DON’T TOLERATE THE ‘PLAYER,’ AND INTENSELY HATE THE ‘GAME!’”

“ALL RAP IS (C)RAP, BAD ROCK IS A (C)ROCK!”

“AMERICA: THE LAND OF ARTISTIC MEDIOCRITY, AND THE HOME OF THE CULTURALLY DEAD!”

Except for a few true artists (Aaron Copeland, Robert Rauschenberg, George Gershwin, Alvin Ailey, Twyla Tharp), over the last two-hundred and thirty-five years, the US of A has always been mediocre at best, when it comes to art/culture. This artistic/cultural mediocrity, however, is now due to America’s incessant need to kowtow to the low-life, criminal nature of “the player,” the three-chord-wonder rocker, and the Hollywood starlet. These so-called “artists” (vermin) are controlled and promoted by the greed-driven corporate-sows (the Hollywood and record-industry executives) who live for one purpose only, to make more and more money.

The downfall of American art/culture began with Blues and Jazz, in the early part of the twentieth century, and has come to fruition, today, in the (artistically speaking) bastard offspring of these two forms of folk-music: “rock and roll,” “rap” and “hip-hop.”

{Jazz and Blues, in their original form, have an artistic quality, but as folk music only. Art is, and should always remain, elitist, and by elitist I mean, not everyone who can write a simple song or poem, or dance a jig, should be considered an artist. Elitism is at the heart of the arts, whether it be politically-correct or not. True art, in my opinion (and I’m speaking from a secular point of view here), should raise man up above the animal kingdom, and above the base, mundane and mediocre aspects of his daily life. Man is mediocre in so many ways, but art, up until recently, has always been the one area man held up to a higher standard. Art was something, wrong or right, that man wouldn’t sell out, until now, that is. Thanks to the postmodern mental-illness, which causes its victims to be rendered incapable of distinguishing between beautiful and ugly, worthy and unworthy, and GOOD and EVIL, everything, in an artistic/craft/cultural sense, is now considered to be on the same mediocre, low-life level: an African wood-carving is now equal with the Mona Lisa, and a native folk-song is now equal with The Planets Suite, by Gustav Holst. The postmodern/Darwinian/atheist has simply taken a world filled with color and made it black and white: one size fits all, and the only flavor is vanilla!}

Instead of progressing in the arts, the US of A has gone all the way back to the “multicultural” jungle. What took hundreds of years, in Western European culture, to raise man up from his baser instincts has now been almost completely destroyed in less than one century!

The Playa yells, “Don’t hate the playa, hate the game.” What a joke! The playa helped invent the game, but he doesn’t want us to know that. The playa knows who he is! The term playa does not refer to all African Americans (although many African Americans defend the playa, instead of standing up to him), no more than the drugged out rocker and Hollywood star represent all Caucasians, Latinos, and Asians.

I will never TOLERATE the playa, or anything like him, and I DO INTENSELY HATE THE GAME the playa helped to create. The game the playa, despite his protestations otherwise, loves and benefits from greatly!

5) “NEVER TOLERATE THE INTOLERABLE!”

Many Caucasian Americans, out of some kind of white-guilt syndrome, have learned to not only TOLERATE but embrace what should be considered, by most civilized peoples (black, white, blue, indigo or violet), completely INTOLERABLE music, theater (movies) and dance. A white-guilt manifested in “multiculturalism (‘valuing diversity’),” “political-correctness,” and “tolerance,” which most Americans, over the past twenty years, have been indoctrinated in while attending public schools. And this white-guilt has set American art/culture, as weak as it may have always been, back hundreds of years.

Music, dance, and movies (theater), that would have been considered obnoxious and perverse trash forty years ago, now get heralded as art; and to the extent that the “Grammy Awards” and “Oscars,” instead of being earmarked solely for the true artist, are now handed out to drug-addicted/drunken, racist/sexist, and perverse, panderers of mediocrity in all things. These developmentally-arrested and stoned-out-of-their-mind hoodlums (black and white), masquerading as musicians, dancers and actors, have done nothing (beyond accruing a “rap-sheet” a mile long) to receive anything but another jail sentence. And yet, instead of another night in handcuffs, they are given awards that once, many years ago, were reserved only for those who had truly earned them: the gifted individual (black, white, Hispanic, or Asian) who was willing to work at, and sacrifice for, his or her art.

Thirty-plus-years ago, I had been on enough album sides to be an active member (voting member) of N.A.R.A.S. (National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences). And for two years, 1978-79, I voted on the Grammy Awards. In each of those years, I voted for Earth, Wind and Fire in their category, because I loved their music. EWF were guys, like me, who had gone to college in music and had come together to write and perform the music they loved: GOOD MUSIC, GOOD COMMERCIAL ART! And, in both of those years, EWF never won. Then, almost a decade later, I saw “rapper” after “rapper” going up to get their Grammy Awards. I was literally nauseated by the spectacle of these low-life x-cons, who “rap” to sexist and racist bad-poetry, set to ripped-off music, getting Grammy Awards. And yet EWF hadn’t even gotten the second look a decade earlier.

It’s time to call out the mediocre, American “artist” (slob) for what he or she is! It’s time for someone to tell the truth: the “player” (“Playa”) king ain’t got no clothes on! He’s naked as a jaybird, perverse, mediocre, and corrupt as hell; as are his (or her) low-life, Caucasian counterparts (subjects of the “playa kingdom,”) on the “rock and roll” and Hollywood side of the plug-nickel (as in, “It ain’t worth a plug-nickel”).

But these folks are merely the pawns of the Caucasian corporate-criminals who own and operate them. You see, the real “playa” king is some white “dude,” in a $5000.00 suit, riding around in a Rolls, who hates anyone below his “station in life.”

The postmodern/Darwinian/feminist/sodomite/atheist tail that wags the American dog has, through the indoctrination of “multiculturalism” in our public education-system, and the intimidation of “political-correctness,” “tolerance,” and even despotic legislation like “hate-speech” laws, coerced the largest portion of Americans into remaining silent, when it comes to what were once considered (and still are by most) to be intolerable actions and lifestyles. The few, through political treachery, have forced their perverse, postmodern/feminist/sodomite/atheistic views on the rest of this society. And this society has responded by sitting idly by while all of this has taken place, over the last half-century.

I will not TOLERATE the INTOLERABLE! I could care less what the politically-correct/tolerant, feces-encrusted tail thinks of me! And now it knows what I think of it!

I will finish slogans 6 through 11 in Follow-Up #2.

The Death of Marriage

What has really gotten my attention recently has been the liberal media going after men and women in plural marriages. This is the same liberal media that acted as an advocate for sodomite marriages. I guess, in these warped journalistic minds, two men “hooked-up” is more normal than a man having two or three wives. What moralists these postmodern-atheists be.

But the death of marriage cannot be completely blamed on the liberal, God-hating feminists and sodomites. Heterosexual men and women, who are responsible for the divorce rate being 70% in major US cities, are also to blame, and even more so if you ask me.

Conservative, “God fearing” religionists are in an uproar over same-sex marriage, and mainly because they love the “law,” and the US of A, more than anything else, including the Lord. To these patriotic religionists, all that really matters is that gays are breaking “the law of the land,” and violating the American tradition of marriage being strictly between one man and one woman. Most of these conservative Americans, however, have themselves been married at least two times, and, therefore, when they defend traditional marriage as something sacred, they simply come off as the religious hypocrites they are.

Jesus told the religious leaders of Israel that God had only granted them the decree of divorce because of “the hardness of their heart:”

3Some Pharisees came to Jesus, testing Him and asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?” 4And He answered and said, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, 5and said, ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH’? 6“So they are no longer two, but ONE FLESH. What therefore God has joined together, LET NO MAN SEPARATE.” 7They said to Him, “Why then did Moses command to GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY?” 8He said to them, “Because of YOUR HARDNESS OF HEART Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way. 9“And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another woman COMMITS ADULTERY.” (Matthew 19)

The Lord hates divorce just like He hates any other sin, since sin is the product of His enemy and can, if we let it, separate us from His Way, Truth and Life. It isn’t that, when we sin, the Lord turns His back on us (although we can quench or grieve the Spirit of God in us), it is that when we sin we sense, in ourselves, a separation from Him, because guilt is trying to keep us from His grace. In other words, when we sin, it is us withdrawing from the Lord, not the other way around. We must remember that Christ became sin itself and died on the cross so we may have the freedom to fail (sin), in the eyes of God, and not be torn away from the Lord by guilt. The Father, when He looks at us, sees the perfect righteousness of His Son, not the still imperfect mess we are: this is GRACE! And this grace is available to all, but most, unfortunately, in their arrogance and self-love, will reject it.

Before I go any farther, I must share that I am not a supporter of gay or plural marriage. And I have been married and divorced, so I am as much a part of this problem as any sodomite and radical Mormon. Most of us (men and women, gay or straight, Mormon or Baptist), by our ungodly desires and cowardice, have helped to destroy the Godly nature of marriage, which is defined in the Word of God:

18Then the LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him.” 19Out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name. 20The man gave names to all the cattle, and to the birds of the sky, and to every beast of the field, but for Adam there was not found a helper suitable for him. 21So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh at that place. 22The LORD God fashioned into A WOMAN the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought HER (not him, or them, but “HER”) to the man.

23The man said,
“This is now bone of my bones,
And flesh of my flesh;
She shall be called Woman,
Because she was taken out of Man.”

24For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE (not wives, not husband, but “WIFE”); and they shall become ONE FLESH. 25And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed. (genesis 2)

In our ungodly desire to have everything we want, when we want it, we (“baby-boomers”) have thrown out the baby with the bathwater in many ways, but, in particular, we have destroyed marriage: a marriage between a man and a woman, anchored in the Lord’s love, truth and life.

It is unbelievable to me that the valuing-diversity and to-each-his-own liberal media, after helping to secure sodomite marriage, has now turned to a more conservative, and hypocritical, attitude towards plural marriage. It would seem the far-left/feminist/sodomite/atheists would back any form of marriage that didn’t include a man being with a woman. This is probably due to the hatred these lost souls have for the traditional roles of male and female in this world, as put in place by the Lord. In particular, these depraved-minded folks despise Caucasian-heterosexual males who love the Lord: men who reject the ungodly feminist ways of the sodomite/metro-sexual (“girly-men”), etc.

{I understand that the Jeffs Trial deals with child sexual-abuse, as well as plural marriage, but sex-abuse of children didn’t seem to bother the liberal media when they were supporting gay-marriage. I guess these “well read and enlightened” intellects never talked with people who had been sexually accosted, as a child, by the sodomite priests and nuns of Catholicism? I guess these self-professed geniuses have never heard of THE MAN BOY ASSOCIATION? It seems to me that liberals, who go after pedophiles like they’re the plague, have a tendency to turn a blind-eye to sex-offenses against children when the perpetrators are sodomites: gay/lesbian/bi/trans-gender. I guess, in their warped, “well-read” minds, only heterosexual men can truly be pedophiles?}

Even according to “natural selection,” the sodomite life is unnatural, since men cannot (“naturally”) reproduce with men, nor women with women. I love to here the twisted logic, which spews forth from these folks, when you bring up the subject of homosexuality being abnormal, even according to Darwin’s unsubstantiated hypothesis. If it wasn’t for materialist “science’s” test tubes, donors and surrogates, sodomites would ultimately become extinct, since they lack “the natural ability to reproduce as a species.”

{To clarify, I am not suggesting that the manipulated (test-tube/surrogate route) child of a sodomite couple will be gay because he or she has sodomite “parents”. There will always be sodomites, as long as the Father allows this world and universe to continue on, just as there will always be drug addicts, murderers, crooks and gangs.}

Even Darwin’s insane “theory” will not support the notion that homosexuality is “natural,” and yet self-professed “evolving” sodomites, in their mentally and emotionally ill state, stand on the LIE they have all bought into, and that is, “They were born this way.”

I am sure that the fall of man is responsible for homosexuals’ mental-emotional-sexual aberration, just as it is responsible for every other malady of fallen mankind. But to claim the Lord created them as homosexuals is to take our loving and forgiving Creator and turn Him into a perverse and hateful monster. If the Lord created man to be with man, and woman with woman, then He is not only hateful and cruel, He is also a liar:

18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. 20For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. 21For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22Professing to be wise, THEY BECAME FOOLS, 23and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.

24Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25For they exchanged the truth of God FOR A LIE, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

26For this reason God gave them over to DEGRADING PASSIONS; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons THE DUE PENALTY OF THEIR ERROR. (Romans 1)

This scripture is the proof that men and women are not created to live a life of sexual perversion, whether it be homosexuality, pedophilia, bestiality or adultery. Yes, the fall of man, which is on man, not the Lord, leaves man separated at birth from a personal relationship with his Lord: this is why young children are often, for no apparent reason, hateful, self-serving little creeps. The Lord no more made men and women to lust after people of their own gender than He made adult men and women to lust after children or animals. We choose whether we will accept the Truth of our Lord, or take our chances living a self-involved and perverse life that leads to nothing but misery, here and now, and in the ages to come. The Lord is not hateful, nor is He unforgiving. And the proof of His loving, forgiving, and grace-filled, nature is evident, since we and the universe still exist. But I digress.

The fact is that homosexuals and heterosexuals have helped destroy marriage. So, beyond the issue of child abuse in the FLDS, plural marriage, like sodomite marriage, should be only the business of the consenting adults involved, no matter how many there are. Let’s not be politically hypocritical here, if sodomites can marry now, then there should be nothing standing in the way of plural marriages. Let’s all, like the tolerant, Godless liberals, “value diversity!” You know, “to each his (or her) own!” Or as the unregenerate say, “Let us eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die.”

The Postmodern Deification of Children

The Result of a Godless, Permissive Society!

To some the following post may seem like an extreme overreaction to a simple news story. But this news story, in my opinion, points to a more serious problem: everything in this country (and world), in my opinion, has been turned inside-out and upside-down, over the past sixty years, and not many people seem to be aware of it. I believe it is time to wake up and realize that the world we experienced yesterday may not be the world we experience today or tomorrow. There is no normalcy left in this ever-changing-for-the-worse world, because the lunatics are, and have been (for quite a while now), running the asylum, just as scripture predicts:

1 You should know this, Timothy, that IN THE LAST DAYS there will be very difficult times. 2 For PEOPLE WILL LOVE ONLY THEMSELVES AND THEIR MONEY. They will be BOASTFUL AND PROUD, SCOFFING AT GOD, DISOBEDIENT TO THEIR PARENTS, AND UNGRATEFUL. THEY WILL CONSIDER NOTHING SACRED. 3 They will be unloving and unforgiving; they will slander others and have NO SELF-CONTROL. They will be cruel and hate what is good. 4 They will betray their friends, be reckless, be puffed up with pride, and love pleasure rather than God. 5 THEY WILL ACT RELIGIOUS, but they will reject the power that could make them godly. STAY AWAY FROM PEOPLE LIKE THAT!

6 They are the kind who work their way into people’s homes and win the confidence of[a] vulnerable women who are burdened with the guilt of sin and controlled by various desires. 7 (Such women are forever following new teachings, but they are never able to understand the truth.) (2 Timothy 3 NLT)

Sound familiar? Does Casey Anthony, as well as a multitude of others, come to mind, perhaps?

When it comes to the disciplining of a child, the Lord states,

24He who withholds his rod hates his son,
But he who loves him disciplines him diligently. (Proverbs 13)

Ever wonder why most (not all) “generation Xers and Yers” are so perverse, angry and violent: out of control? Study the history of the last half-century-plus and you might just find out why; in particular, check out how public education has been turned inside out, upside down, and backwards, by the extreme far-left-liberal feminists, girly-men (heterosexual men: the “metro-sexuals”), and sodomites (lesbians/homosexuals/”bisexuals”/”transsexuals”), who have been running it into the dirt since I was a child (I’m 61). But most, if not all, of the problems these two generations pose to the rest of us can be attributed to their lazy, irresponsible, “self-actualized parents!” These Postmodern “parents” believe children need complete freedom to explore and experiment, so they can ultimately become “self-actualized:” completely “evolved” human beings. These Darwinian/relativist “parents” claim, erroneously, that correcting and punishing children will stifle and transform them into violent criminals. These so-called parents’ atheist rose-colored glasses have completely blinded them to anything resembling the TRUTH! They are blind guides raising up even more blind guides!

The following article speaks of this type of “parent” whose world-view/philosophy is this: you and I should cease to exist when their “precious, little Junior and Sissy” are in our vicinity. “It’s all about our children,” is their mantra, and to hades with the rest of us!

Restaurant that has banned screaming children says business is better than ever.

A North Carolina restaurant has put a ban on unruly children, with a sign on the front door saying screaming children will not be tolerated.

Brenda Armes, the owner of the Olde Salty’s restaurant in Carolina Beach, said she got sick of customers complaining about parents who couldn’t control their children during meals.

She said many parents allowed their children to treat the restaurant like their personal playground, misbehaving and ‘squawking’…

And the policy seems to be working, with business booming at the restaurant.

Mrs Armes said: ‘It has been a good thing for us. It has brought us in more customers than it has ever kept away.’ (emphasis mine)

via Olde Salty’s restaurant that banned screaming children says business is booming | Mail Online.

First of all, why would any responsible parent bring their under-six-years-of-age child into a restaurant/BAR? The owner said his restaurant is considered to be, by most of his patrons, a “for adults only” establishment. So why would any responsible parent bring a child that young into this kind of setting, especially when there are hundreds of restaurants, everywhere, that cater solely to the family? And if these “parents” didn’t know it was an “adults only” restaurant, then the BAR should have been their first clue!!

Generation X in all of its Glory!

Why is business booming at a restaurant where the owner has the audacity to stand up to politically-correct “parents” who believe their children should be free, always, to do just as they please? Because, like me, many folks, who have remained silent over the past half century of “our children this” and “our children that,” are fed up with arrogant, lousy “parents” and their out-of-control, “self-actualized,” obnoxious brats! I have wondered, for years now, when adults, with or without children, would finally get fed up with being bullied by irresponsible, self-absorbed “parents,” and the mentally and emotionally ill feminists and sodomites who promote this preadolescence and adolescent megalomania. And why do these Godless folks promote this kind of obnoxious behavior? Think about it! Who needs society to be more completely open and free to do as one pleases than the feminists and sodomites?

But even in the former “Christian fellowship” I once attended, children seemed to rule the roost, to some extent. Here is an example of what I mean: I was in the music ministry, and we had a band that not only played for the “services,” but also played at the fellowship’s social functions. We were setting up to play for a New Years Eve gathering at the “church,” when several children (around 8 to ten years old) came running up on stage and began man-handling instruments and equipment. I watched the “parents” of these out-of-control brats to see if they were going to do their Godly duty and discipline their children. Guess what, it never happened. I was angry, and when two of the children went to pick up my Selmer Mark VI (tenor sax), valued at around $4000.00, I told them, in a firm and unfriendly tone, “Do not touch any of my instruments, unless your parents want to pay for the damage!” They turned and walked away, but I noticed I was getting dagger stares from the “parents” of the children I had just warned. I stood there and looked at them and waited, and longed, for them to approach me about speaking to their children “that way,” but, after a while, they just turned and went about their business. They knew they didn’t have a scriptural defense to hide behind:

1It is a trustworthy statement: if any man aspires to the office of overseer, it is a fine work he desires to do. 2An overseer, then, must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3not addicted to wine or pugnacious, but gentle, peaceable, free from the love of money. 4He must be one who manages his own household well, KEEPING HIS CHILDREN UNDER CONTROL WITH ALL DIGNITY 5(but if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how will he take care of the church of God?), (1 Timothy 3)

Now here is the kicker to this story, the trumpet player, an elder and “home church” leader (as well as an attorney), said to me, “You shouldn’t say anything to these kids, the parents won’t like it!” I replied, “I could care less if these so-called parents don’t like it! I don’t like their spoiled brats handling my expensive instruments either!” I went on to tell him that if I had done the same thing, at their age, my parents would have taken turns whipping my deserving posterior. But, then again, my parents could discipline me that way, then, because they didn’t have to fear being arrested on assault and child abuse charges. Big (sodomite-feminist) Brother hadn’t been revealed in his full, ungodly glory at that time, for if he had, my parents and their peers would have raised up and overthrown the government/economic-system/culture Big Bro was seeking to create and rule over!

Thus, this so-called “nation of laws” (“a free nation?”) is getting exactly what it deserves, with its Godless, invasive, moronic laws: undisciplined, childish, irresponsible citizens who will take all the undeserved accolades they can gather, but not once will they take even the smallest rebuke/criticism, no matter how constructive it may be:

5A STUBBORN FOOL DESPISES his father’s DISCIPLINE, but whoever appreciates a warning shows good sense. (Proverbs 15)

With this said, then, it shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone that there are no real men left to oversee our government, economic system, and culture. We have only little boys, dressed as men, attempting, and failing miserably, to respond like mature adult males. They are so self-absorbed and immature that they are incapable of resolving even the smallest of problems, the only thing these “girly men” can accomplish is to respond to crises like a spoiled child who isn’t getting his way. Is it any wonder, then, that the American empire is well on its way to total oblivion, and after only two-hundred and thirty years?

{Just sit and watch the national news and you will observe, and, hopefully, discern, what I am talking about. Our government officials are totally incapable of resolving their political differences, not to mention our horrible economic and social issues. All these little-boys-in-men’s-clothing can do is play the political game that has been going on for the past sixty years: the last real “man in office” was Dwight D. Eisenhower!}

We have a nation filled with weak-willed “men” ruled by a small minority of abnormally dominant “women,” and an assorted variety of perverse, mentally-ill individuals (“gay/lesbian/bi/trans”). And this Godless, corrupt and perverse minority has taken what was not perfect, but worked, and turned it into a muddled-mass of confusion that makes Sodom and Gomorrah look like heaven.

This is the “stable environment” that American children grow up in today. Is it any wonder, then, that the largest portion of them have no values, no “moral” foundation, to stand on? Is it any wonder that many are sexually promiscuous before their teenage years, users of illegal drugs, and hateful and violent? Is it any wonder that some take weapons to school and kill each other? When the Lord is removed from every aspect of a child’s life, then that child is in extreme peril.

I know wonderful, responsible and loving parents who have home-schooled their children and raised them in the ways of the Lord. These children have been brought up with a Godly love and discipline, which has instilled in them a love of the Lord, their parents, and peers, and a proper (not blind obedience), healthy respect for those in authority. These children are not who you see roaming the streets at night, or getting busted for drug possession. These are the children you’ll never hear about on the local or cable news channels; and basically because decent young people are very seldom apart of the sensationalized news stories that entice bitter, vengeful-for-no-reason, and gossipy old women to tune in and buy soap suds: a Nancy Grace audience. Besides, these are the children of God, and the mainstream press doesn’t want to shine any positive light on our Lord or His children, since their god is the father of lies!

I am not blaming little children in this post! If they are brats, at any age during childhood, then their “parents” are solely responsible for that outcome. And no child should be exposed to an establishment centered around alcohol, adult language and situations. Children have always looked to their parents and other adults for protection and guidance. Most children desire a home where there is (Godly) love and discipline: children need a place to go in this world where they can be safe and experience, everyday, open communication, wisdom/knowledge, correction/chastening, acceptance and, of course, unconditional love. What the postmodern family offers a child is acceptance without scrutiny (“Go and do as you please, it’s your life!”), a worldly wisdom/knowledge that is ever-changing with the Postmodern/Darwinian/atheist breeze, and a brand of secular love (self-love) that seeks, first and foremost, its own, as opposed to other’s, basic-animal wants and needs: a naturally selected, self-preserving (“survival of the fittest”) and mutated brand of “parenting and family,” which is primarily responsible for what we see walking to their Godless and confused public-schools everyday.

When I was a child, children were anything but deified. My parents’ favorite comment to me and my friends was, “Children are to be seen and not heard.” This would be considered child abuse today, the postmodern idiot would scream, “You can’t talk to a child that way!” When I was being corrected by my parents, in a more forceful way, our obnoxious neighbor (Joe) would yell, “Smack him again!” Of course, this was a joke between Joe and my parents; Joe wasn’t completely serious, and yet, to some degree, he was. This enforced ideology of strict discipline was enough to keep most of us juveniles in our proper place: “A child, like man, has to know his limitations!” We hadn’t lived as long as the adults around us, we knew nothing of life, and thus we were to listen and learn. Did all of us turn out perfect in this system? Absolutely not! But even those of us who did fall, during our lifetime, knew that it was our fault and not everyone else’s. When we made mistakes, we, for the most part, took responsibility for them and were willing to pay the penalty. Unlike today, where these little gods mess up and the fault, in their minds, always lies with someone else: you know, the Adam and Eve-syndrome, “He/she made me do it!” Most of these modern little gods have no sense of responsibility. Life is all about them, and only them: Lindsy Lohan, Paris Hilton, Casey Anthony, Britney Spears, etc, etc, ad-nauseum!

Thanks to the feminists/sodomites/girly men/atheists, children, today, are to be listened to, even if they have nothing of real importance to say, which is almost always the case! It is an amazement to me that children, who can’t find their state on a map, are considered, by most postmodern “adults”, to be wise enough to be listened to on important issues. But, then again, the postmodern/atheist world is a make-it-up-as-we-go place. It’s an “Oz” experience, where little green individuals are the leaders and thinkers, those who show the way, while the big kids are the naive and lost in need of being shown the way. It is an upside-down-and-backward world, it’s a silly, childish place. It is a photo, a portrait, of what happens when the insignificant-in-comparison created-being begins to believe it’s greater than the Omniscient, Omnipresent and Omnipotent Creator, to the extent that it claims the Creator doesn’t exist:

28And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, 29being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, 30slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; 32and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them. (Romans 1)

It is the “parents” I am pointing a finger at here. Take responsibility for the raising of your children! Your children are not society’s responsibility! They are YOUR RESPONSIBILITY! If you can’t find a “politically-correct and tolerant village to raise your child” here, then move to Africa; but you might want to take a good look at African culture first, since African villages can’t seem to raise their children properly either. Generation X and Y are examples of an entire American “village” attempting to raise “the child.” What a horrible, sad joke to play on unsuspecting children. If you aren’t going to take the time to love, raise, and educate your child, then don’t get pregnant. It is as simple as that.

P.S.

8/21/11

I was listening to the news this morning, and there was a story about a pilot dying in a crash at an air-show yesterday. Immediately, before mentioning the lost life of the pilot, or the pain his family and friends must be feeling today, this “bobble-headed bleached-blond” reporter started talking about the children having to witness this kind of tragedy: she said, “The children were asking their parents, ‘What happened?’” The children weren’t even aware of what had actually happened, by the grace and compassion of our Lord, but the parents certainly were! So why all the concern for the children ALONE?

Then it came to me, once again, the postmodern individual’s deification of, and overtly false concern for, children is due to their horribly guilty-conscience, what little conscience they have, that is. These rights-oriented, Godless-individuals are simply attempting to compensate, with or without knowledge, for their dire sin against unborn (BUT ALIVE) children (not fetuses) who have been murdered in their mother’s womb. And simply because a human law states that a woman, no matter how whorish or irresponsible, has “the right of choice.”

I wonder, sometimes, if postmodern-hypocrites ever wonder if murdered unborn babies (NOT ZYGOTES) are aware of what is happening to them at that very moment, if the baby is aware of their own mother allowing them to be poisoned or ripped apart, because she wanted her rights and freedom more than she wanted life for her own child? I wonder if, in their postmodern/atheistic dreams, they hear the thoughts of murdered babies crying out, in great terror, “Why is this happening to me?” or “What have I done to deserve this?” or “Why am I so sick?” or “It hurts, what are they doing to me?” If these hypocrites don’t experience this, then they certainly should! All this uproar (as there should be) over the molestation of children, is nothing but a postmodern-dodge for the guilt the postmodern experiences over the murders (the new holocaust) of millions upon millions of unborn (BUT ALIVE) children. The last time I took a good look at these two horrible issues, the murder of an unborn and helpless child seemed much worse to me than the molestation of a child. I could be wrong, but I doubt it!

The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)!

I happened across one of the pop “science” channels and there sat this evolutionary psychologist proclaiming, in an obnoxiously atheistic and authoritative tone, that “the human animal” was never intended to be monogamous. According to this Darwinian “intellect”, an “evolving human animal seeks to be joined” (to mate) and yet the “human animal” is “an adulterer at heart”. Why are human beings “adulterers at heart”? According to this over-educated purveyor of postmodern (unsubstantiated) propaganda, human beings are nothing more than advanced primates who have little or no control of themselves or their actions. Human beings (“the human animal”), according to this Spiritually dead hack and quack, have no basis for civilized behavior, beyond, of course, that which “natural-selection” has, through mutation and chance (evolution), alloted them.

{In a little over one hundred and fifty years, these Darwinian lab-coated and pocket-protecting atheists have taken the sanctity and beauty of human life, a life created by God, and transformed it into a seething cesspool existence (“Darwin’s primordial soup”) where everything is “relative” and there is no absolute truth.}

This kind of atheistic/”scientific” propaganda has a desensitizing effect: if totally held as a belief, this “theory” will dehumanize other human beings in the minds and hearts of those believing the lie. When a person with no real substantiated evidence becomes convinced that he or she is little more than a mutated-by-chance chimpanzee, then along with their own life other people’s lives become devalued in their hearts and minds. This devaluing of human life, then, can open the door to all kinds of evil in the name of “science” and “humanity”: a “science” under the guise of “progress” (myths) that in the end harms more than benefits humanity.

Introduction

Voices haunt the pages of every book. This particular book, however, speaks for the never-born, for those whose questions have never been heard for those who never existed.

Throughout the first six decades of the twentieth century, hundreds of thousands of Americans and untold numbers of others were not permitted to continue their families by reproducing. Selected because of their ancestry, national origin, race or religion, they were forcibly sterilized, wrongly committed to mental institutions where they died in great numbers, prohibited from marrying, and sometimes even unmarried by state bureaucrats. In America, this battle to wipe out whole ethnic groups was fought not by armies with guns nor by hate sects at the margins. Rather, this pernicious white-gloved war was prosecuted by esteemed professors, elite universities, wealthy industrialists and government officials colluding in a racist, pseudoscientific movement called EUGENICS. The purpose: create a superior Nordic race.

To perpetuate the campaign, widespread academic fraud combined with almost unlimited corporate philanthropy to establish the biological rationales for persecution. Employing a hazy amalgam of guesswork, gossip, falsified information and polysyllabic academic arrogance, the eugenics movement slowly constructed a national bureaucratic and juridical infrastructure to cleanse America of its unfit. Specious intelligence tests, colloquially known as IQ tests, were invented to justify incarceration of a group labeled feebleminded. Often the so-called feebleminded were just shy, too good-natured to be taken seriously, or simply spoke the wrong language or were the wrong color. Mandatory sterilization laws were enacted in some twenty-seven states to prevent targeted individuals from reproducing more of their kind. Marriage prohibition laws proliferated throughout the country to stop race mixing. Collusive litigation was taken to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sanctified eugenics and its tactics.

The goal was to immediately sterilize fourteen million people in the United States and millions more worldwide the lower tenth and then continuously eradicate the remaining lowest tenth until only a pure Nordic super race remained. Ultimately, some 60,000 Americans were coercively sterilized and the total is probably much higher. No one knows how many marriages were thwarted by state felony statutes. Although much of the persecution was simply racism, ethnic hatred and academic elitism, EUGENICS wore the mantle of respectable science to mask its true character. (emphasis added)

via War Against the Weak – Introduction.

Eugenics, a pseudo-scientific/ideological aberration of Darwin’s half-cousin, Francis Galton, was the bastard child of Darwin’s racist tendencies and unsubstantiated hypothesis (“natural selection”). Eugenics is the “common ancestor”, the “founding father”, of today’s modern genetics (stem cell “research”, and a popular form of “selective breeding”, “designer babies”): a morally questionable at best “science” that thrives in this hedonistic country, as well as the rest of the world. Through this manipulative renaming, eugenics has merely been dressed up in a more “politically-correct”, “tolerant” and less objectionable garb (genetics); a garb that seeks to cover up the ungodly elitist hatred and bigotry, the dirty underwear, that is at the heart and soul of eugenics.

One can sprinkle flowers and perfume on cow manure in order to make it look and smell better, but if he or she gets real close and digs real deep he or she will find that it still looks and smells like bovine excrement. In the same sense, a pile of unsubstantiated hypothetical excrement by any other name still smells like “bad science”!

This kind of desensitizing and life-devaluing propaganda (evolution/eugenics/genetics) has been perpetrated on every child attending American public schools for the last three-quarters of a century or more. Is it any wonder, with this in mind then, that American public school students, over the past twenty years, have made the evening news for mass murdering felllow students and teachers in their high schools. Is it any wonder, then, that prior to the nineteenth century (before Darwin) there were no records of “serial killers” to be found anywhere in the world? Is it any wonder, then, that in America alone Darwinian-indoctrinated doctors, over the past thirty-plus-years, have “legally” (Roe v. Wade) murdered hundreds of millions of unborn babies (“abortion”)?

{Unborn children, alive in their mother’s wombs, torn apart by chemicals and surgical instruments (“aborted”), and for the sole purpose of granting an immature and promiscuous woman’s “right of choice”. A “woman’s right of choice” to escape the ultimate penalty for responding to her sexual desire like a female animal “in heat”: an “unwanted pregnancy”, a truly inconvenient truth. Why wouldn’t a “liberated” woman respond this way? After all, the feminist/lesbian/atheists, like the psychologist above, have pounded into women’s minds, during the last forty-plus years, that their bodies belong to them, and therefore, they have the “right” to do with them as they see fit, no matter how heinous the outcome. “Liberated” women have become desensitized and dehumanized to the point that their unborn children have become nothing more to them than unwanted inanimate objects: unwanted inanimate objects euphemistically referred to as “embryos” and “fetuses”. The maternal qualities that God built into women are all but gone now, and like men, women, today, are truly less than the human beings their Creator created them to be.}

Is it any wonder, then, that Hitler, seven decades ago, was able to find a “scientific rationalization” through evolution and eugenics for the mass murder of millions of people (literally) branded as “inferior races”? Is it any wonder, then, that other nations in Europe since Hitler have followed his example by seeking to “ethnically cleanse”, through mass murder, their countries of the inconvenience of “the unfit for life”?

…one of Hitler’s favorite sayings was, “POLITICS IS APPLIED BIOLOGY“. Hitler’s ideas of racial purity led to unprecedented atrocities in Europe. Since then, ethnic cleansing has occurred in Cambodia, the Balkans, Sudan, and Rwanda. In one sense, ethnic cleansing is another name for the tribal warfare and mass murder that has afflicted human society for ages, but these crimes seem to gain intensity when believed to be SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED. (emphasis added)

via Social interpretations of race – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

“POLITICS IS APPLIED BIOLOGY.” In other words, since the “human animal” has evolved and is, therefore, nothing more than a mutated-by-chance ancestor of a chimp, then it is, in a political sense, expendable: “Since there is no sacredness or eternal value to life, the disposal of certain breeds of ‘the human animal’ (ethnicities, races) can be politically and socially expedient!” Note also that, according to this author, these kinds of “crimes intensify when believed to be SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED”. Has there ever been a more SCIENTIFICALLY SANCTIONED (and unsubstantiated) hypothesis as “natural selection”?

When we become desensitized to the sanctity of life, then we open the door for the devaluing of our own lives and those around us; we begin the long disastrous journey toward the dehumanization of ourselves and everyone else. This perverse kind of postmodern/atheistic coercion can be rather subtle at first: the introduction of “scientific” theories, as unsubstantiated as they may be, and the use of terms and phrases (euphemisms) such as “common ancestor,” “natural selection,” “survival of the fittest,” “the human animal,” “embryos,” “zygotes,” “fetuses,” the “feeble-minded,” and the “UNFIT FOR LIFE,” can lull us into a Godless stupor where life of any kind is no longer reverenced.

Bald-faced liars didn’t start out that way: they started out with little fibs that got more and more involved, which then lead to more elaborate lies until one day they couldn’t tell the difference between the lies and reality. The loss of integrity can happen in much the same manner: a person starts with one little lie to the boss, or the pilfering of money from the safe, but after a while the lies become bolder and the theft increases until that initial small crack in integrity has turned into a Grand Canyon of lies and thievery. A “scientific theory” can begin with a flawed hypothesis and, unless corrected or thrown out, can then grow into a bald-faced lie put forth as truth; and in the end, this unsubstantiated “theory” (bald-faced lie) can end up doing more harm than it ever did good; such is the case with evolution and eugenics/genetics, whether we are willing to face the facts or not!

If we’re not careful, then, we can become like frogs in a frying pan: a frog placed in a frying pan filled with water and set at a low temperature, which is then slowly increased, will sit there totally unaware and seemingly unaffected until he is completely cooked through. In a similar manner, most people will sit quietly by while listening to and believing every unsubstantiated “scientific theory” put forth by lab-coated “geniuses” until these so-called “theories” have totally obliterated their ability to reason.

Hitler didn’t start out in the early 1930′s by suggesting the mass-murder of millions of Jews, gypsies and homosexuals. No, he started out with subtle and subliminal language (“theories” and ideologies) that would slowly but surely indoctrinate and blind the German people to the truth of what he was about to do.

In conclusion, do we really know and understand what lies at the heart and agenda of eugenics/genetic research today? Do we really know and understand why an unsubstantiated hypothesis (“natural selection”), by an emotionally and religiously confused man (Darwin), is being thrust on our children: in the public schools, by the government, and on every television channel and news program? If the “theory of evolution” is as airtight as the Darwinian lab-coats claim, then why are they so fearful of an alternative to their religious dogma: why are they so against the teaching of “intelligent design” and creationism in the public schools? Why do these Darwinian lab-coats fight so vehemently against a simple parenthetical clause in science textbooks that states, “Evolution is merely a hypothesis that many scientists disagree with.” If they’re so sure of themselves and what they believe to be true, then why are they so afraid?

{A liar doesn’t want others delving deep into his lies, nor does he want the truth exposing his lies!}

Are these politically powerful, Darwinian lab-coats so afraid of their weak hypothesis that they don’t want it scrutinized in any way? I thought good scientific practice amounted to treating any hypothesis as being false until all information contained in the hypothesis could be thoroughly substantiated through scientific scrutiny? I guess this kind of science (science seeking the truth) has either become rare or non-existent in the world today?

Those of us with children, who also have faith in the Lord, should keep them from being indoctrinated in this bald-faced and bad-science fabrication: science and knowledge are not evil, but educational indoctrination and bad science are! From the beginning of life, the education of children is not the responsibility of the ungodly state, it’s the responsibility of the parents! Education is a responsibility that, since the inception of public education, has been shirked by almost all parents, except, of course, those who have chosen to embrace their parental responsibilities by homeschooling their children.

Do we want our children to grow up believing that their ancestors were puke-eating chimpanzees? Do we want our children to value the sanctity and preciousness of created life, whether it be a kitten, robin or another child? Then we best be speaking to our children, while we still have the authority and opportunity, about the lies being perpetrated by the atheistic powers that rule this world system!

Postmodern, “Politically-Correct” & “Tolerant” Hypocrisy: It’s Everywhere!

This is a short follow-up post to Freedom of Expression vs. Postmodern Despotism II.

Here is one current example of the postmodern-religious despotism and hypocrisy I have described:

June 15, 2010

SC senator again refuses to resign over ‘raghead’ comment, says he has been called names

by Seanna Adcox

The Associated Press

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — A state lawmaker again apologized Tuesday but refused to resign for calling the Republican gubernatorial front-runner a “raghead,” adding he’s been called names, too, and he’ll proudly accept the redneck label.

Sen. Jake Knotts said the Republican Party should embrace the redneck term and its origin.

“I am proud to be stereotyped as a redneck. The true meaning is a hardworking farmer who works from dawn to dusk to support his family and got a red neck from working in the sun,” said Sen. Jake Knotts, R-West Columbia, rattling off a list of rednecks’ positive traits. “If all of us rednecks leave the Republican Party, the party is going to have one hell of a void.”

His comments on the Senate floor came after GOP leaders in his home county publicly reprimanded him. Last Thursday, the executive committee of the Lexington County Republican Party voted to censure him and ask him to resign for his comment made about state Rep. Nikki Haley during an Internet political talk show. (emphasis added)

via Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.

It is evidently alright for Mr. Knotts to be referred to as a “redneck”, in the eyes and minds of postmodern religionists, but it’s not alright for Mr. Knotts to refer to someone else as a “raghead”. This, of course, is a hypocritical double-standard.

Why is it that Caucasian-middle-aged men, no matter their politics or ideology, can be insulted and discriminated against, and no one, on the postmodern left, will come to their defense, while Asian, Hispanic, Arab, and African American men (and women), in particular, are treated like “sacred cows”? Caucasian-middle-aged men have, over the past half-century, become accustomed to being portrayed and LABELED (“profiled”) as weak-willed and incompetent “racists”, “bigots”, “sexists”, “crackers”, “Whiteys” and “rednecks” (depending on where they hail from, and what they believe): just check out any sitcom from the ’70s’ All In The Family to the ’90s’ Married With Children and Everybody Loves Raymond and you’ll see Caucasian-middle-aged men portrayed as bumbling mama’s boys who are in need of a postmodern/feminist/homosexual/atheist makeover. But let one of these Caucasian-middle-aged men call a woman “honey”, or say to a group of African Americans or Hispanics (without malice), “You people…,” and the postmodern-politically-correct machinery will rear-up and seek to destroy him. Today, a White man addressing an African American assembly, with the opening, “You people…,” will elicit the same response as a true racist shouting, “Hey, boy….,” would have elicited fifty to eighty years ago. It truly is an upside-down and backward world we live in: the lunatics are, without doubt, running this planet-sized asylum!

Years ago, when I was teaching in an inner city high school, I was standing hall duty, and there were several African American and Caucasian students, in between classes, hanging out around their lockers. This was, according to the school’s administrator, against the rules: students were only to be at their lockers first thing in the morning, at lunch, and after school, and it was my responsibility to enforce the rule. So I told them, “Let’s go folks, get to your classes. You know you’re not allowed to be at your lockers now.” Most of the students moved on and did as I told them. But one African American (male) student stood there and said, “What do you mean by ‘folks’?” I ignored this asinine and inflammatory question, knowing that he was seeking to assert his “rights” as a “politically-correct” African American, and asked him if he’d like to talk to the principal instead of going to class. He moved on, while mumbling, “Racist”.

This is what “political-correctness”, “tolerance”, and “valuing diversity”, has gotten us: disrespectful, self-involved, and BIGOTED, “victims-of-racism” who, for the most part, want to get away with murder, or make a political stink every time a Caucasian male, in particular, calls them out for being irresponsible or worse. These postmodern, “politically-correct” “sacred cows” believe they have, somehow, someway, earned the “right” to not be offended in this life, even though they themselves are in desperate need of being offended and changed for the better: they, on the other hand, have no problem at all with offending others, in particular, Caucasians (“Crackers”, “Whitey”). I guess “being offended” means something different in postmodern land: I “offended” this impudent, disrespectful, and RACIST, student by holding him accountable for breaking the rules, not, as he was seeking to claim, by referring to him and the other students (including Caucasians) as “folks”. I didn’t put up with his “racism” nonsense then, nor would I put up with it now.

{I had Caucasian, African American and Asian students in my program, and all of them were held to the same educational expectations and discipline. I loved my students, and they knew my expectations were the same for all of them: I expected them to complete the work assigned, to take pride in their work and their fellow student’s, to obey the rules, and to respect each other, my co-teacher and me. And all, but a tiny few, were successful in my program.}

We Caucasian-middle-aged men find ourselves in this “politically-correct” and “tolerant” mess because we haven’t, as yet, stood up to this out-of-control postmodern religious tyranny (despotism). Just because the color of my skin happens to be white doesn’t mean that my great grandparents were slave owners or that I’m a card carrying Klansman. And the fact that I’m treated as such by many African Americans, who don’t know me from Adam, exposes their own racist tendencies or outright bigotry. The racist card has been played way too often: it’s much like the boy who cried, “Wolf,” just once to often.

Getting back to the point of my post, mature adults, on either side of this political circus, should not stoop to childish name calling. It is, however, the postmodern religionists who most often take part in this kind of childish behavior, which, of course, makes them nothing more than hypocrites. Postmodern religionists need to practice what they love to preach to everyone else; they need to practice shutting-up long enough to allow someone else to EXPRESS (as in freedom of expression) a dissenting opinion or belief, and then be “tolerant” of that opinion or belief. This, of course, will never happen, since impudent, child-like adults are almost always incapable of change!

Freedom of Expression vs Postmodern Despotism (Part II)

This is Part II of Freedom of Expression vs Postmodern Despotism. Please read Part I first.

Postmodern religionists (“devolving” humanists) have evidently decided that creating their idea of an earthly Utopia will require them to radically alter the political and social structure of the nations. These postmodern religious zealots desire a “one-world order”: one government, one economy, and one man-made ideology/philosophy (a postmodern religion). But most of all, they desire a world where there is no Creator God and, thus, no believers in Him. A world where mankind is god. In essence, postmodern religionists simply want (without knowledge, of course) what the serpent, their true lord and savior, had promised Eve in the garden; what mankind has been tempted by ever since:

The serpent said to the woman, “You surely will not die! 5“For God knows that in the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and YOU WILL BE LIKE GOD, KNOWING GOOD AND EVIL (“enlightened”).” (Genesis 3)

As I have stated before, I don’t believe we (believers) have any political rights, and my belief is based on the earthly life our Lord and Savior exhibited. So I’m not posting on this issue to stir up a political hornet’s nest. I’m writing these two posts simply because I find most postmodern religionists to be hypocritical, especially when it comes to the subject of freedom of speech and thought (expression). Like this poster states, “No Opinions TOLERATED, But Ours!”

According to most postmodern religionists, only those who think, believe, and act as they do, are permitted to openly express their views. Anyone having an opinion, which falls outside of the narrow-minded postmodern-Utopian ideology, will immediately be silenced by the speech and thought police (gestapo): this silencing is accomplished by shouting down the offending party or by labeling them “politically incorrect”, “intolerant”, and/or purveyors of “hate speech”. In this way, then, the postmodern religious tail can wag the dog (the American majority) until it has been coerced into total silence. This is how most despots initially start their regimes; and then comes the intimidations (in public venues and college campuses), violent demonstrations, burning of books, mandatory oaths to the state, arrests, beatings, torture, and lastly, a hangman’s noose.

As an example of this far-left despotism, a few years ago a sports commentator made the mistake of claiming that many people of African descent have a distinct advantage over other races, physically and, therefore, athletically. He simply stated, and without malice, that this advantage was due to the physical nature of most Africans. This man wasn’t claiming that all Africans were athletically gifted or that athleticism was all Africans have to offer the world, he was just making the same observation that many of us, including many African Americans themselves, have made over the years. After all, most African American athletes, college and pro, are not at all shy, when it comes to bragging about their physical and athletic prowess.

The postmodern political machine (the race card pundits), of course, immediately moved into action and jumped all over this man: he was labeled a “racist” and a “bigot”. The news channels, over the next few days, ran his comments and ultimately, through their politically-correct witch-hunt, ruined this man’s career. And all this commentator had done, in reality, was dare to express his opinion.

"White Men Can't Jump!"

All anyone has to do is take a long-hard look at college and professional sports, and they’ll observe, if they have eyes to see and a mind to reason, that many, or even most, African American athletes have a distinct advantage, physically and, therefore, athletically, over other races they compete against; in particular, Caucasians. This conclusion has nothing to do with bigotry, or “hate speech” (or even jealousy), this conclusion simply is the result of observation and experience. Over the last forty-five years, I have watched thousands of sports events and have come to the same conclusion as this commentator. My conclusion is not a racist one, nor, in my opinion, was this commentator’s. I’m simply sharing my conclusion, which is based on forty-five years of watching African American athletes excel over other races.

{Remember the movie, “White Men Can’t Jump”? Where was the postmodern furor over this statement, this movie? It seems that “White men” do not fall under the same “politically-correct” and “tolerant” cover that African American men do. Can anyone say, “Double Standard” or, “Discrimination” or, “Racism”? There wasn’t any “double standard”, “discrimination”, or “racism”, involved in this movie: in comparison to most Black athletes, Caucasians (White men) can’t jump. This isn’t “intolerance”, “racism”, or “bigotry”, this is just the plain and simple TRUTH!}

In my opinion, this commentator’s only real mistake was being born a Caucasian male, first of all, and then, secondly, talking about the physical attributes of another race, especially people of African descent. We Caucasian males must remember to bear our “White guilt”, according to the postmodern lunatic fringe (the minority tail). I’m sure this commentator was totally unaware of the “politically-correct” machinery that was waiting (as it always is) to seek out and destroy anyone it judged to be “politically-incorrect” and/or “intolerant”. This Caucasian male commentator was stripped of his “right” to express himself (the “right” of any American citizen), simply because he chose to share his thoughts (to express his opinion) on the physical and athletic supremacy of most African Americans.

“Political-correctness”, “tolerance” and “hate speech” have become the weapons of choice for enforcing postmodern religious censorship: the despotic silencing of expression and, in many cases, the TRUTH. “Big Brother” is alive and well and, at the moment, probably taking part in a “gay pride” parade or “a woman’s right to murder” rally. As this quote from the article states,

“Respect is being redefined as agreement, and censorship disguised as a virtuous defence of diversity…”

It is no longer enough to “live and let live” and simply say, “To each his own,” which most of us are willing to do. In the postmodern Utopian world, those, who are of a different mind-set and, therefore, opinion, are not only to “tolerate” what they sense to be ABNORMAL and DOWNRIGHT WRONG, they are also expected to respect and embrace it. According to this postmodern despotic-dogma, I not only have to “TOLERATE” the fact that homosexuals have the “right” to marry, and women have the “right” to murder their unborn (and ALIVE) children, I also have to respect and embrace these ABNORMALITIES and ATROCITIES as if they were a normal function of life. It seems to me that our “political rights”, these days, have much more to do with being WRONG than ever being RIGHT.

{TOLERATE: 3. To PUT UP WITH; ENDURE.}

With all of this said, then, has anyone else noticed how truth, whether it be simple or absolute, seems to be disappearing from the face of the earth. Truth is not very popular these days, especially when it forces certain people, whether they be African American, Caucasian, Asian, or whatever, to take a good look at themselves in the mirror. By certain people, I mean those who were brought up in a society where the messing-up of one’s own life, as well as everyone else’s, was still worthy of a pat on the back. These particular self-absorbed and self-assured folks were raised-up in a postmodern/feminist/lesbian dominated society; where competition had become a dirty word, and not competing was worthy of reward; where men were weak-willed and effeminate, and women were more masculine than feminine; where a person’s “self-esteem” and “self-actualization” (self-everything) were more important than his or hers’ tested and proven character. These folks were raised-up in the U.S. of A., over the past forty years, and they are now running the show for the rest of us.

In a nutshell, the U.S. has become a narcissistic and hedonistic nation, where beauty, health, sexual appeal, and wealth and power, are prized above all else; where the Lord’s Truth is now considered to be “old fashioned” or “out of date”. “America is a nation of laws”, but it’s also a nation of poor excuses: poor excuses for being morally and ethically bankrupt, cruel, corrupt, perverse, slipshod, and downright mediocre at best.

In the battle between freedom of expression and postmodern despotism, the postmodern religionists have won. But they haven’t won the war, nor will they. The war will be won when the Lord comes, in great power and glory, to establish His reign on earth. So, as much as I’m troubled by all of this, and I truly am, I must wait on the Lord’s righteousness to be manifested in its fullness.

Freedom of Expression vs. Postmodern Despotism

Below is a quote from a Pew Forum article that caught my attention.

“We are in danger of losing the battle for freedom of speech,” Mr. Rushdie said. It is being recast as a Western imposition, not a universal human right. Respect is being redefined as agreement, and censorship disguised as a virtuous defence of diversity…

Freedom of expression and imagination “is now very much back in question, and is strongly under attack by religious authorities and religious armies of different sorts, and not only Islam,” Mr. Rushdie said. (emphasis added)

via “We are in danger of losing the battle for freedom of speech”: Salman Rushdie.

I would imagine that many will come to the conclusion that Mr. Rushdie is speaking exclusively of the Islamic religion. But I believe Mr. Rushdie is also speaking of a worldwide political ideology that is actively seeking to silence all dissenting voices:

“Freedom of expression and imagination ‘is now very much back in question, and is strongly under attack by religious authorities and religious armies OF DIFFERENT SORTS, and not only Islam.’”

A worldwide political ideology that is, in reality, nothing more than a new form of religion: a despotic postmodern religion seeking to establish its version of a Utopian world.

Humanists, over the past forty or fifty years, have been absorbed into this new despotic religion. The humanists’ openness, intellectually and culturally, has all but disappeared and been replaced with the closed-off, arrogant, and aggressive, pseudo-intellectualism of postmodern religionists.

By pseudo-intellectualism, I mean older humanists, for the most part, were highly educated, intellectually gifted men and women who were open to differing opinions and ideologies. These men and women also loved and supported the Arts: painting, sculpting, theater, dance and music. Whereas today’s postmodern religionists refuse to listen to any differing opinion, whatsoever, have just enough education to be dangerous, and are, for the most part, lacking in knowledge of, or appreciation for, the (true) Arts. Postmodern religionists have also been “educated” in a more narrow-minded system (public and higher) than older humanists: an education system which, as opposed to teaching, indoctrinates students with its “politically-correct” and “tolerant” curriculum: “Women’s Studies”, “Multicultural Studies” and “The Impact of ‘Rap music’ on American Culture”. While claiming to “value diversity” and “open-mindedness”, this narrow-minded “education” system hypocritically seeks to silence all diverse opinions and ideologies; which are, in its opinion, “politically-incorrect” and/or “intolerant”. According, then, to these religious zealots, freedom of expression is only for those who have sworn their oath of loyalty to the postmodern religious dogma; all others are to either conform or be coerced into remaining silent.

The sad results of this narrow-minded and despotic education-system can be observed all around us. Today, there are far too many Master and PhD degrees in history, philosophy and biology, etc, who are almost dead, culturally/artistically: they adore Lady GaGa and Britney Spears, but have never listened to Beethoven’s nine symphonies or a Chopin Nocturne; they obsess on television sitcoms, comic books and X Box games, but wouldn’t know Rembrandt’s paintings from Pablo Piccaso’s, or Christine Aguilera’s on-stage gyrations from Twyla Tharp’s legitimate choreography. Many of these supposedly highly educated men and women (“our brightest minds”) cannot even take part in a controversial conversation without resorting to child-like shouting and name calling, nor can many of them even identify their own state on a map.

Thus many of these self-proclaimed geniuses are at a complete loss, when it comes to discerning what is true or false, politically, ideologically, morally or ethically, and what is true Art, as opposed to merely someone’s hobby, religious idol or garbage. The only political/ideological/moral discernment most of these folks possess comes from what they have heard from others or made-up in their own minds. And the only Art they are familiar with is the street-born, low-life variety (“crafts”): “rap” and “alternative Rock” (Music), “Saturday Night Live” and “The Kardashians” (Theater), a crucifix in a jar of urine and cartoons (Visual Art), and primitive bumping and grinding in an overtly sexual, vulgar manner (Dance).

Western European culture has been rejected by most postmodern religionists today. Postmodern religionists have real issues with those who set a high standard of excellence in their work and have a real sense of personal responsibility: if everyone took personal responsibility for their actions and sought to achieve excellence in their work and life, then the lazy, unproductive and low-life leaches in society would feel left out; and, “Darwin knows”, postmodern religionists can’t “tolerate” that. The postmodern must bring everyone down to the level of the lowest achiever. This is the reason why many bright and eager-to-learn students, in this country’s public “education” system, find it hard to excel: these students are literally held back, so the lazy, arrogant, and almost always absent, problem student (the “player”) doesn’t have his or her precious “self-esteem” affected in a negative way. Instead of seeking to raise these problem students up to the educational level of their peers, who attend school to learn (as opposed to goofing-off or selling drugs), the complete opposite is accomplished: “The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America”. The other reason for the postmodern rejection of Western European culture is, in my opinion, due primarily to its Caucasian-male roots: Caucasian/heterosexual/Christian men are despised by most postmodern feminists, lesbians and homosexuals.

There is nothing in the postmodern reality that will ever be considered good or bad, right or wrong, since everything, in their warped reality, is “relative”: everything is “equal”, unless, of course, something is deemed “politically-incorrect” and/or “intolerant”. The postmodern Utopian world is a sad place, where mediocrity thrives and excellence dies a slow and tedious death.

Is it any wonder, then, that the largest portion of public-school-indoctrinated students (Generations “X” and “Y”), over the past forty years, have been horribly lacking in basic reading and apprehension skills, basic writing and communication skills, and simple problem-solving. And, of course, these developmentally arrested lost sheep are totally incapable of discerning true Art forms from corporate-commercial excrement?

{I left out science and computation skills, because the Darwinian/atheist nature of this country’s public-school systems stresses “science” and math skills. After all, the postmodern/Darwinian/atheists need to keep their little student-robots prepared to carry on the war against God; so “materialistic science”, as opposed to legitimate science, and math skills are stressed, highly, in their tax-payer-funded indoctrination-camps (schools). For anyone who has ever watched Jay Leno do his street interviews (where he asks folks easy questions and the majority are totally clueless), what I’m writing, here, should not be that surprising or objectionable. Jay’s interviewees are the results of a public-education system run by postmodern religionists: a self-replicating education-system, where postmodern robots raise up more postmodern robots. A self-replicating education-system whose long-term (behavioral) goal is to raise up an entire world of mindless, “politically-correct” and “tolerant” ancestors of puke-eating chimps.}

Art!

In the postmodern religionists’ retro-grade-inverted sense of reality, a make-it-up-as-they-go reality, a carved out piece of wood from Africa (a fertility god, for instance) is as much a work of Art as Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa or Michelangelo’s David. The word “craft” has evidently been removed from the language, since everything in a creative sense is now considered to be Art, no matter how primitive and poorly made (“crafted”). It seems that our wonderful gifts from the Lord, creativity, the ability to learn and discern, which once set us apart from the rest of creation, are now being attacked and destroyed. It seems that the postmodern elite desire for man to become more animal-like (instinctual) and, thus, ungodly.

Craft!

According to postmodern religionists, everything is now to be done by instinct (“lifestyle”, “sexual orientation”, etc.): “What does your instinct tell you to do?” In a world of no absolute truths, where everything is totally up for grabs, instinct is all one really has to make any kind of decision or judgment: “free moral agency”. Evolved human instinct, in the mind of the postmodern, has replaced the leading of the Lord’s Spirit and Word.

{“Free moral agency”, in my estimation, wreaks of an individualism that stands in the way of true moral and ethical judgment, since every “free moral agent” has his or her own sense of what is moral and ethical behavior. How, then, can a nation of “free moral agents” come to a consensus on what is moral and ethical behavior? After all, if we’re all “free moral agents”, then how can we impose our will, when it comes to morality and ethics, or anything else for that matter, on other “free moral agents”? Isn’t every “free moral agent” FREE to decide what is moral and ethical and what isn’t, according to his or her own INSTINCTS: INSTINCTS, according to the postmodern religion, passed down from his or her ancestor (a puke-eating chimpanzee)?}

With this is mind, then, is it any wonder that what was once considered to be moral and ethical behavior is now considered “outdated” and “old fashioned”? And is it, then, any wonder that many people are becoming, everyday, more animal-like in their behavior?

Moral relativism, which is devoid of the Lord’s Truth and discernment, is, I believe, at the heart of our societal ills. Most of this postmodern INSTINCTUAL wandering (“free moral agency”) can, of course, be traced back to “the enlightenment” and one unsubstantiated and dehumanizing hypothesis: Darwin’s fairy-tale, “natural selection”/evolution.

I will finish this in Part II.

The Desensitizing, Dehumanizing Effect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics on the Human Mind and Heart (the Cognitive and Affective Domains)! (Follow-Up)

J. Craig Venter (Darwinian Megalomaniac) Proclaims, "It's Alive! My 'Synthetic Bacterium' is Alive! There is no God! I'm God"

This is a follow-up post to The Desensitizing & Dehumanizing Affect of Evolution & Eugenics/Genetics!.

As a former composer, I understand that taking a small segment of existing music (melody, chord progression) and using that small segment to create a new piece of music is not composition (the creation of new music), it is, instead, the “arranging” of music that already exists:

The American Federation of Musicians defines arranging as “the art of preparing and adapting an already written composition for presentation in other than its original form

via Arrangement – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Arranging, then, is different from the creation of new music (composition): musical composing is the act of creating new music. So a composer, in one sense, is a creator, whereas an “arranger” is a person who uses an existing composition to produce a “musical arrangement”.

In much the same way, then, a group of “young Frankensteins” (“genetic scientists”) can take previously created (God breathed) DNA and, with the help of a computer program, ARRANGE it in such a way as to produce, or MAKE (not create), a “synthetic” cell. This arranging of life is not creation, nor does it solve any mystery about life, since the DNA (or DNA model) used for replication, by this computer software, had already been created by the Lord, in the beginning.

On May 20th, 2010, it was announced that a bacterial cell had been “synthetically created”:

May 20, 2010

Researchers say they created a ‘synthetic cell’

by Nicholas Wade

The New York Times

The genome pioneer J. Craig Venter has taken another step in his quest to create synthetic life, by synthesizing an entire bacterial genome and using it to take over a cell.

Dr. Venter calls the result a “synthetic cell” and is presenting the research as a landmark achievement that will open the way to creating useful microbes from scratch to make products like vaccines and biofuels. At a press conference Thursday, Dr. Venter described the converted cell as “the first self-replicating species we’ve had on the planet whose parent is a computer.”

“This is a philosophical advance as much as a technical advance,” he said, suggesting that the “synthetic cell” raised new questions about the nature of life

Other scientists agree that he has achieved a technical feat in synthesizing the largest piece of DNA so far… (emphasis added)

via Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.

Let’s look at the word “synthetic”:

1) Relating to, involving, or of the nature of synthesis.
2) Chemistry. Produced by synthesis, especially not of natural origin.

a) Not natural or genuine; artificial or contrived: “counterfeit rhetoric that flourishes when passions are synthetic” (George F. Will).
b) Prepared or made artificially…

Seems to me this “materialistic scientific” zealot is jumping, as is the case with most Darwinian atheists, to a totally unsubstantiated conclusion: Venter hasn’t created anything, he’s simply taken what the Lord created and ARRANGED it into a “synthetic” form (“not natural or genuine, artificial or contrived”), and with the help of a computer program no less! I don’t believe I remember anything about the Lord needing the help of a computer program to create the entire universe.

"I'm so Alone!"

By this young Frankenstein’s use of the word “synthetic”, he has only succeeded in disqualifying his weak ARRANGEMENT of the Lord’s DNA from being considered “a creation”, according to the original meaning of the word:

Creation:

The divine act by which, according to various religious and philosophical traditions, the world was brought into existence.

When this developmentally arrested, in a philosophical, moral and ethical sense, ne’er-do-well (modern eugenics monster) creates a brand new form of life, alive and functioning, and from scratch (not ARRANGED), then he can claim there is no God, and he is the creator: by “a brand new form of life”, I mean a living cell that comes into existence through the use of something other than DNA (real or “synthetic”). Until he’s created this totally new form of life, Venter simply needs to go back to his Frankenstein lab and merely think of himself as an “ARRANGER” of the Lord’s Creation. That is if Venter doesn’t want his Creator sending a not “synthetically produced” bacterium to cause serious damage to him and his assistant (Igor: “Yes, master!”): you know, like “plagues”, the “wrath of God” stuff!

{Just kidding, the Lord is probably laughing at this overeducated twerp and his little “ARRANGED” cell. In the eyes of the only Creator, Venter is probably just another atheist mouse who is attempting to roar! Or to coin Will Shakespeare: “What fools these mortals be!”}

So, I will close with an “ARRANGEMENT” of an old country hit’s lyrics: “Mothers, don’t let your boys grow up to be Darwinian atheists!” If you do, this will be the result: lab coated socio, psychopaths!

“He got Arrested for Being ‘Politically-Incorrect’ on a Friday Night!”

Especially Christ & His Truth!

Before I begin, just let me say that I am not on this earth to preach to or judge anyone. If I were to begin judging others for their sins, then I would have to take care of my own first, and I can’t get that done, since there are just way too many of them! I will, however, and without any hesitation, make judgments about the beliefs, ideologies/philosophies and actions of others, as well as those individuals who have chosen to set themselves up as judges in this world: this includes secular judges and those who claim to have been ordained by God to judge others, Spiritually: the right reverends, popes, pastors, televangelists, etc.

“Do not judge (others) so that you will not be judged. 2“For in the way you judge (others), you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you. 3“Why do you look at the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? 4“Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ and behold, the log is in your own eye? 5“You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye. (Matthew 7)

“The truth hurts.” There was a time when most everyone understood and accepted what this adage means. There was a time when people, living a perverse and destructive lifestyle, understood and accepted the reality that their lifestyle might, if exposed to the light of day, be shunned by society. There was a time when most folks understood that life isn’t always fair, and that sitting around whining about it was never going to alter that fact. But in today’s retro-grade inverted world, where the “evolved-from-chimpanzees” postmodern/Darwinian feminists, homosexuals and atheist/agnostics rule, all semblances of rational thinking, believing and behaving (normalcy) have quickly begun to disappear, as the following Pew Forum article reveals:

May 04, 2010

Street preacher charged for saying homosexuality a sin

by Al Webb

Religion News Service

LONDON (RNS) A Christian street preacher in Britain will stand trial for telling a passerby — in earshot of a policewoman — that God views homosexuality as a sin.

Police arrested Dale McAlpine, a 42-year-old Baptist, under Britain’s Public Order Act 1986, which forbids “using threatening, abusive or insulting words … tending to and causing harassment, alarm or distress.”

McAlpine told The Daily Telegraph newspaper that he was arrested after a part-time police officer said she heard him reciting a list of “sins” against God, including blasphemy, drunkenness and same-sex relationships.

The preacher denied mentioning homosexuality, but he did concede he had told a passing shopper that it was a sin in the eyes of God. (emphasis added)

via Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.

Yes, folks, it’s a tell-it-like-it-ain’t… or-else world out there. It’s a world viewed through postmodern rose-colored glasses (a drug-induced “Through-the Looking Glass” type of vision), where the bizarre is considered the norm and the norm the bizarre: east is west, south is north, up is down, men are women, women are men, and everyone who buys into this grotesque facade is either a genius or hero. Whereas those who have refused to wear, or have, over time, chosen to remove, the postmodern rose-colored glasses are profiled as being “politically-incorrect”, “intolerant”, “racist”, “bigoted”, “sexist”, “homophobic” and “hate mongers”, or some combination thereof.

These postmodern, politically-correct and tolerant “geniuses” and “heroes”, who, by the way, scream the loudest about their rights to free speech and “lifestyle choices”, are the most despotic of all, when it comes to the free speech, thoughts and beliefs of others; in particular those who profess a belief in the One True God and Creator of all things. My very statement about the Father and His Christ, here, makes me, in the eyes of these postmodern bigots, totally “intolerant” of other religious views and thus a “purveyor of hate and hate speech”. Therefore, like this preacher, I must be silenced, because I am ruining the “natural” chances of a postmodern Utopia taking place on earth. Freedom of speech and thought are evidently, now, only for the politically-correct and tolerant few who are destined, in their own minds anyway, to ultimately decide what the best course for humanity and the world is to be: a course, no doubt, directed towards some form of Utopian world, where the postmodern Darwinian/naturalists and atheist/agnostics can rule as they see fit, even if that means doing away with all other ideologies/philosophies, beliefs and the “politically-incorrect” and “intolerant” people who profess them. Orwell had it almost right, except that it would be folks, like himself, who would become the promoters, followers and enforcers of a Godless “Big Brother” culture and world!

This preacher was arrested for merely attempting to speak the truth of the Lord to those he sensed were lost and hurting. Perhaps, this preacher was giving information about God to someone who hadn’t asked for it: institutionalized Christians are notorious for giving answers to questions that have never been asked of them. And this bad habit has been, in my estimation, what has driven and continues to drive most people away from proselytizing Christians and the religious dogma they “preach”. But is this proselytizing a crime? Is this giving of unsolicited information worthy of being accosted, arrested and imprisoned for? Is sharing with someone what is written in the bible truly to be considered a form of “hate speech” today? Is England beginning to take part in the same despotic practices as Islamic and communist nations, where Christians, for decades, have been harassed, arrested, tortured, imprisoned, and even executed (murdered), for merely speaking of the Lord?

Devout Muslims, those who truly practice the faith, detest homosexuality and will put a homosexual to death, if the opportunity presents itself; whereas this Christian preacher was merely stating what the bible says about homosexuality:

…that which is known about God is evident within them (human beings); for God made it evident to them. 20For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse…

Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

26For that reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing INDECENT ACTS and receiving in their own persons THE DUE PENALTY of their error. (Romans 1)

I can’t wait to hear how this “politically-correct” and “tolerant” informant (an eavesdropping “snitch” with a badge) fairs when trying this same kind of postmodern behavior-modification on card-carrying Islamic radicals; who, by the way, are in the process of taking over London, and the rest of the United Kingdom and Europe. These particular religious zealots aren’t as peace-loving and passive as most Christian preachers. So I hope, for the sake of this Ms. “hear-me-roar” law-enforcer, that she thinks twice before attempting this same kind of cutesy despotic act on Islamic fundamentalists. If she doesn’t, then I hope she has her personal affairs in order, since being a woman, first of all, and then, secondly, trying to arrest a Muslim male for speaking against homosexuality, would, in my estimation, put this little lady’s life in extreme jeopardy: a not-so-postmodern-Utopian jeopardy that could ultimately lead to a REAL-WORLD OF HURT!

Hey, don’t shoot the observer! I’m just trying, like most other folks, today, to be “culturally relative”, a “valuer of diversity”, by respecting a devout Muslim’s right to practice His culture and religion, no matter how heinous and vile the “custom” and “doctrine”. You know what I mean, don’t you? I’m trying my best, here, to be “politically-correct” and “tolerant” of other people’s cultures, since, in this postmodern world, there is no right or wrong, good or bad, sacred or evil anymore. Now, everything is “relative”, unless, that is, a person is professing to have an absolute eternal Truth of God, then its, “Off with their ‘intolerant’ and ‘hate-filled’ heads!”.

Yes, the subject of this article frustrates me, but not because of this preacher’s political “rights” being violated. The subject of this article frustrates me, because English law is now punishing people for loving others enough to speak the Truth to them. This preacher is being hauled into an English court of law for loving someone enough to speak the Lord’s Truth to them. He’s being labeled a purveyor of “hate speech” and a “homophobic” by an English society that has evidently turned its back on the Truth of God: a society that is, now, openly promoting a warped version of life, under the atheistic-pop-culture cover of “cultural relativism”, “tolerance” and “political-correctness”, where homosexuality is considered to be as normal as love between a married man and woman.

Guess what, folks? I can sit anywhere in this world, tonight, and tell anyone who passes by that night is day and day is night. And, if given enough time, wealth and political power, I can probably even enforce this bald-faced lie by making it the law of the land. But this law, no matter how heavily enforced, will never change the fact that day is day and night is night. In the same way, then, a corrupt and perverse law, no matter how effectively it be enforced, can never change the fact that homosexuality is a disease of the mind, heart and body of the person it invades and destroys. You can silence the people, who see and proclaim that the king is totally naked, by accosting, arresting and imprisoning them, but that will not change the fact that the king is totally naked.

If the politically-correct English would be totally honest with themselves, in their relativistic way of “reasoning”, they WOULD NOT promote the idea of homosexuality as “being as normal as heterosexuality”, they would simply, instead, in a true relativistic manner, proclaim that there is no collective “normal this or that” in this world. In other words, a true relativist would see no difference between a man and woman having sex with each other or having sex with other members of the same sex, or with animals and children, for that matter, since, in each case, it would simply be a matter of “personal choice” or “personal preference”, relatively speaking, of course. And this “right” to expect respect, from all others, for one’s own “personal choices or preferences” is the doctrinal basis for the relativist religion: “to each his own” is their mantra. Of course, this is where the relativist comes off looking rather badly, since a postmodern relativist, European or American, would never condone an adult man or woman having sex with an animal or child. Thus true English and American relativists are either lacking in understanding of their own religious doctrine, or they are extremely hypocritical, it’s one or the other.

"It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery."

Now that I’ve written all of this, let me say that I disagree, in at least one respect, with this preacher’s approach to the subject of homosexuality, and that is his attempting to bring the Truth of the Lord to people, affected by this disease, by threatening them with “the due penalty of sin” and “the wrath of God”.

Homosexuality is a sexual sin, according to the bible and God. But the Son of God, the Christ our Lord, died so those who would truly believe on His name might be set free, for all eternity, from the guilt of having broken the Father’s righteous Laws. We, who believe, have been made complete in the eyes of our Father, through the Love and sacrifice of His Son. We, who believe, are truly no longer enslaved to the guilt associated with our sins, which have kept us trapped in a virtual “if this, then that” sin scenario: “If I sinned, then God won’t love me. And if God doesn’t love me, then I might as well continue to sin.” A sin scenario perpetrated by a false and hypocritical religion, which has masqueraded as the Lord’s Truth for the last eighteen hundred years.

Let us, then, with this in mind, break out of these false religious chains that weigh us down, Spiritually, mentally, emotionally and physically, and be set free in Christ our Lord and Savior. In the Lord’s reality of Light and Life, we no longer have to hold on to, indignantly and rebelliously, those things of our flesh that we know, deep inside, are destructive to ourselves and others. We have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God, from the best of us to the worst, but our Lord died to cancel out this falling short, this debt to the Father. So let us, then, believe and rest in this Truth and know that He can also deliver us from what enslaves us in this life, here and now.

God didn’t make us to be imperfect people He could never have a relationship with. The fall of man, in the beginning, made us imperfect by separating us, at birth, from our relationship with the Father in heaven. But His Son, the Christ, came, died and was resurrected to reverse this separation, this sense of rejection, once for all. Let us, then, live as we truly are: a chosen people of God free to try and fail and try and fail again and without fear of the Father’s rejection and punishment, now and in the ages to come.